pansyfaust
-
Content Count
85 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Medals
Posts posted by pansyfaust
-
-
Why? Sounds really good to me.
I got just the occasional birds chirping, something you're more likely to hear on altis than in a dense jungle.
-
Hell fucking yes!!!
Can't wait to test it!
The Tanoan jungle sounds worse, a lot worse.
-
On the matter of wrong coloured LODs; I believe a part of the problem is the rather short shadow distance and I wish bohemia could find a way to render distant shadows without impacting performance too much.
-
1
-
-
Hard to say. If it is, then at least the container setup is completely different. Also the freighter in the video has a huge smokestack on the back, which doesn't seem to be on the ship in the editor video.
PS: Wasn't the model data stuff released for use / conversion to ArmA3, like all the terrains, etc? Did the same happen for Take on Helicopters? I am kinda curious why apparently nobody ported the ship stuff over, as it looks kinda cool in any case.
You have the binarized PBOs available, I'm guessing debinarizing/altering the models is still prohibited.
Hopefully someone from BI could clear this up.
Edit: Seems the data has the APL-SA license which means you can create adaptions of it for ArmA games, so I guess porting it to arma3 is possible?
-
Other than indestructible bridges? :)
Or you could bridge the gap with some engine limitations:
https://a.pomf.cat/fddmqu.webm
<_<
-
2
-
-
MQ-12 seems to be impervious to all light arms, including .50 BW
Is this intentional?
Also, the MQ-12 pilot doesn't get any HUD in 1st person.
-
2
-
-
Sometimes you people are some real negative nancys.
Well what do you know, underpromising and "overdelivering" hasn't turned out so well, has it?
-
I think items in inventories are rendered in 3D eventhough you can't see them. It's always been the case AFAIK.
I've just tested it with Intel GPA, I believe this theory is wrong.
-
I think items in inventories are rendered in 3D eventhough you can't see them. It's always been the case AFAIK.
If this is true I think I'm entitled to a refund.
-
Got a bug with the campaign:
https://a.pomf.cat/tffbbb.webm
Loading east wind missions ends up loading prologue missions.
Also, on rare occasions the main menu screen shows prologue campaign under the play button, when clicking on play the only campaign available is the prologue.
-
I'd like to suggest a feature for the SDV; is it possible to make it use the raise/lower turret keys instead of an action for the periscope?
-
3
-
-
Can we get event handlers for VIVT?
Preferably both for the carrying aircraft and the vehicles on board (similar to GetIn and GetInMan).
-
Question, is there a script command to get vehicle cargo, meaning, the vehicles that are loaded into the cargo hold of the Blackfish ? Any command to eject them ?
attachedObjects vtol
detaching should be: (driver vtol) action ["UnloadAllVehicles", vtol]; However, it doesn't seem to work.
-
Only if the model of the logistical vehicle is made terribly. If the model is solid, and you can drive into the vehicle, it'd be no different than it is now, at least in terms of functionality. It would work as intended, but just look 100 times better. The whole teleporting thing kills it. The C-17 video, while not the best, is a decent example. I'm sure there's probably better examples out there.
As for boats having the VIV, it's not needed, because physics already handles that. You don't need a script the drive a vehicle up onto a flat loading bay on a boat and drive it around, it's already seamlessly possible without a "Load" attachto script. For planes though, that's another story.
Are we playing the same game? Have you tried flying a plane in multiplayer while relying on physx alone to handle your vehicle cargo?
-
The decision was probably made due to what happens when a vehicle isn't locked into place with attachto; a big fireball.
Anyway, I'd love to see boats configured for VIVT too:
-
1
-
-
Is there a particular reason why the Caesar BTT gets a soft shadow while the rest of the expansion vehicles get hard shadows?
Are there plans to resolve this inconsistency (which is also present with vanilla arma content)?
-
https://a.pomf.cat/xawogx.webm
Some absolutely horrible LOD flickering, gets worse the more you zoom in.
Edit:
Shadows render incorrectly on bridge road surfaces, soft shadows render in poor resolution while hard shadows do not render at all:
https://a.pomf.cat/kikfzr.webm
(Look at the shadow quality on the bridge sidewalks compared to the road surface)
-
The Type 115 .50 round seems really weak at hit = 8 putting it at the same level as a 5.56 round in damage.
There's indirect damage too but it seems really unreliable and destroying (civilian) car tires can take anywhere from one to 4 rounds.
-
EG Spectator doesn't seem to work for group/side/bird respawn types anymore, not quite sure about the other ones.
Is this intended?
-
I got a feeling this isn't the only dev branch update we'll see today.
-
3
-
-
Are the AI driving enhancements going to extend to naval vessels too?
It's really hard to get AI naval transportation going when any AI venture near the coast usually ends with the AI getting themselves beached.
-
1
-
-
Seems like license plates were fixed for vehicles spawned in Eden, still doesn't work for createVehicle sadly.
-
Not sure if it's related directly to the visual upgrade, but the full sniper uniforms aren't affected by shadow at all.
some animals like goats aren't either.
-
Yeah I know about the current method, I was just thinking it'd be nice to have as a simplification and perhaps a small performance gain.
General Discussion (dev branch)
in ARMA 3 - DEVELOPMENT BRANCH
Posted
Nope, getting bird chirp during daylight and crickets during the night, nothing else.