Hello
I have been watching alot of Arma 3, 2 videos lately, and I saw a lot of comments like: "it's meant to be hardcore, most realistic military simulator, as real as it gets, tactical cooperated secret realistic operations.."
and others such as: "cod players go home, you have no place here if you play bf 3, this is the game people play to experience realism in its true form"
There is no problem with saying that, I myself think arma can deliver fairly realistic experience - compared to other games, with the use of some mods, and teamwork...
though
I also noticed that in more than 60% of the "Realistic co-operation, tactical mission, ..." videos I watched, the player was in third person mode most of the time..
Or used 3rd person to take a quick look-around..
I can't understand that... maybe my meaning is wrong but what is the point in wanting to experience a realistic military action when you have a
third person camera enabled? Even if you use it for a quick 360 degree peek around your vehicle...
-Could be I watched only the wrong examples..
But anyways..
you could argument with "IRL you can maneuver more freely and see more clearly so 3rd person makes up for that".. I think arguments like that are plain nonsense
I don't mean to argue or insult, but enlighten me if you can