![](https://forums.bohemia.net/uploads/set_resources_8/84c1e40ea0e759e3f1505eb1788ddf3c_pattern.png)
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/671adbcdc9dfb5b012b11cafa058ac89?d=https://forums.bohemia.net/uploads/set_resources_8/84c1e40ea0e759e3f1505eb1788ddf3c_default_photo.png)
lendova
-
Content Count
18 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Medals
Posts posted by lendova
-
-
Tests shows, an i3 close to an overclocked pentium G in ArmA 3 which is still slow for me, maybe its enough for you.
-
the wrongest possible answer to his question. The real answer in your style is: you need a 10Ghz-haswell cpuDont be silly! 8GHz should be enough, 10GHz for AMD.
-
paired with what GPU? on Air or Water? With what speed RAM? My RAM was 2133mhz. With or without SSD? Is the SSD SATAII or SATAIII?None of them matters.
http://i.imgur.com/F3IQGBP.jpg
CPU 4.5GHz, 2GHz ram, GTX 760 OC, Sata 3 SSD
Yes, its can go that low (campaign- preventive diplomacy). Marksman showcase: avarage 60+, Combined arms showcase: 30-40 once on the ground.
-
I was in the high 40s low 50s.I would be glad, if an FX could provide that performance all the time.
Its cant hold even 30 fps just in the campaign. Its doesnt matter if its a 6xxx or a 8xxx chip neither how high the clock speed.
-
Paired with What GPU and at what graphical settings? My 8120 ran just fine with a modest OC to 4GHz High settings paired with a 7970 and SSD.Do you like hot beer? Thats how "fine" a shooter with ~30 frames.
-
My setup:640 propus
4gb ram
hd 6790
I've come here because steam forums has given me no real answer.
This game loves to use around 50% cpu and 30% gpu and about 1gb of ram.
Problem is I get terrible fps, changing settings don't mess with fps unless render distance is set like 30k then it will drop the frames.
I gave it a nice overclock and it is now 17.5% faster according to benchmarks.
The game now runs faster, but it still using the same amount of cpu and gpu...
about the cpu tho it uses all cores, but it does something like 80% 30% 30% 30%.
In the main menu it will max out the gpu with the nosplash and skip intro.
Around alpha/beta this game ran beautifully on some pretty dang high settings and would race my gear.
You should forget ANY ArmA with AMD CPU. The game rely almost only on one CPU core performance.
Just an example: Intel CPU 2 core vs. AMD CPU 8 core:
-
Honestly, an AMD FX series CPU 6300 and up can run this game just fine too. Obviously, the faster the clocks, the better but, the AMD chips are still decent gaming chips for the money. I wish I still had my 8120 when I run a TADST server and the game on my rig at the same time. My 4770k just cant handle some of the mods on the server mission.Define "fine".
My FX6300@4.4GHz not even close to provide a "fine" perofrmance in this game.
-
IMO the fps drop depends on the server in wich you play.Not the same playing SP as playing in a 80 slot server.
And depends too in the proccessor. Horrible performance with AMD as everyone says.. :391:
I know, i wrote those numbers for singleplayer.
-
I´ve got the same GPU and works fine in the game.With 8GB ram, perfect.
and the same for the proccesor.
You should play 60 stable fps. BUT, take a look to the game settings first. max object and terrain view, antialiasing, PiP...
Apart from that. The FPS not only depends in your PC. The GM and the server optimization is very important in this game.
Except 80% of the time, when he/she get 30-40 fps.
-
thanks man only problem is i dont have windows 7 64 bits.and also i dont know how to activate all my ram cuz windows sais i only have 2.21 gb available out of 4gb.
Your system is enough to run the game...with horrible performance.
-
I almost always test with bohemia made missions, using vanilla.But, diverting blame is a popular tactic around these parts.
Here's to hoping DX12 (whenever they get around to it) gives enough of a boost to make the game playable *most* of the time. I suspect it will help a lot b/c it seems draw calls have been a big part of the problem. Taking that load of the main core, at the very least, should help to free it up for more jobs.
I'm pretty sure, if Arma gets DX12 support, it will be exclusive for the standalone expansion to milk the community again.
-
Again, thank you for the great help. I've read people online using AMD 6300 and being able to work the system out to be able to play just fine. I don't care if I can't play on ultrahigh settings.You stated that you can change only the motherboard, so what help do you expect? You will have from little to much less performance in almost(or every game) compared to a similar priced core i3.
Even at 1km view distance, an overclocked FX provides poor perofrmance. Have fun to use 50% of your graphic cards power in ArmA 3!
-
That's not very helpful, but thanks anyway?I'm sorry, but thats the truth.
Btw, who recommended to you to buy an FX CPU?
-
Hello everyone. I'm new and I was wondering how well I would be able to run ArmA 3 with the following:AMD FX-6300
Cooler Master Hyper 212 EVO (if I overclock I assume this would matter more)
EVGA GeForce GTX 960
2 sticks of RAM, each 4 Gb
Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3P
This will be a completed build within a week or two, and as of this writing the only thing I can alter is the motherboard. As for the CPU, do you suggest I overclock, or should it be good as is? The FX-6300 is 3.5 GHz, 6 core (for those who don't know). Thank you.
Be prepared for horrible performance.
-
I can't comment on this, but as a free tweak/upgrade it can't hurt to test and see if it improves performance noticeably.
Its not free, since he dident bought the game yet and i would not recommend to do it.
An OC-ed FX 6-8xxx cant hold even 30 fps all the time in the campaign, guess what his/her much lower clocked phenom will do?
-
Unfortunately tweaks aren't really going to help you (if they even help anyone!).In my experience low view distance will only really affect gameplay in the air, generally most ground based contacts are within a couple of hundred metres. Obviously sniping may cause issues but the game doesn't revolve around sniping.
If you can overclock your processor it should help things, I believe the gains from overclocking AMD processors is slightly lower than those from overclocking intel but still worth doing.
Overclocked AMD chips still perform horrible in ArmA 3...even at 4.5-5GHz.
-
Hey! Have terrible performance, just the lowest preset gives 40+ fps in towns. The game is fully updated (1.11), installed via steam.
Win 8.1, audio, chipset, directx, vga drivers are the latest.
FX 6300 @4.2GHz, 8GB ram @ 1866MHz, Ati 260X 2GB GDDR5
non optimal system perfomance , on an over the spec system
in ARMA 3 - TROUBLESHOOTING
Posted
Intel Dual core vs. AMD 8 core:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mj7wnRA1yDo
Once the 10GHz single core Intel chips arrives, we gona have the perfect CPU to play ArmA 3.