not sure if srs.
So, full release has arrived and there are no alpacas in the game. None. Zero. Not wild or domesticated. This is the future of warfare? As society progresses we have finally, through the long human history of animalism, realized that alpacas have much to offer when it comes to defending their countries. Also, a Mediterranean island is completely devoid of alpacas? How did anyone make clothing or ponchos, and more importantly, who survived the cold there if there were no alpacas? Yet the game completely ignores this (but does give us 'Rabbits' and 'Snakes' as animals, complete with stereotypical ears and slithering animations completely unbelievable and bursting at the seams with bigotry).
The outrage over the lack of military content is understandable to me, if not fully shared. It's a game, they did what they could, and they know the community will pick up the slack in areas that are lacking. But to release a game that completely ignores the alpaca (that's 1/6th of the biological family Camelidae) is unacceptable and should draw as much outrage. Like it or not, alpacas are a part of this world, and they are especially vulnerable and suffer in war just as much as any man. I doubt BIS has any alpacas on staff not relegated to menial jobs and subject to lower pay, and the last insult was not even including them in the finished product. Just a blanket dismissal of alpacas in the most flippant sense possible.
Check your privilege, BIS.
You know, I'm all for equality between sexes and everyone in general, but this is just ridiculous. There's many better ways to promote equal rights between sexes, and one of those is concentrating your "outrage" on something that actually matters, like the actual oppression of women. Not because you can't play as a female or shoot a female in a videogame that just got released.