Jump to content

Rhym3z

Member
  • Content Count

    6
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Medals

Community Reputation

10 Good

About Rhym3z

  • Rank
    Rookie
  1. Couldnt have put it better myself.
  2. Its the case because they didnt listen to complaints about arma 2 and arma 3 alpha/beta and still use the same horrific engine.
  3. Rhym3z

    Bad FPS in Full Release

    Only the devs have a fix, but will they do anything about it? Not a chance
  4. Never more true words spoken, absolute disaster of a release. Same shitty engine, Same fps problems that plagued arma 2 and they had plenty of warning. Boring and barren landscapes and almost 0 immersion. Why they didnt just create a whole new engine i dont now, awful. The above reasons may have been countered by lots of content, but theres hardly any. What have they been doing all this time? Obviously nt listening to the community. What a waste.
  5. Im worried about the release mainly because im doubtful that the release version wont be anymore optimized than The current beta, Im kind of getting sick of arma games being so poorly optimized, u'd have thought from player feedback, not just from the beta But from previous issues with arma 2 aswell, that optimization would be a heavy focus, but i dont think it is. Also after playing the altis, map, im extremely dissapointed how dull and flat most of it is, not to mention that its not even half as dense than old chernaraus. I know its supposed to be based on a real place, but wheres all the cover? Wheres the foresty areas etc? It just looks like a giant stratis, barren. i hope someone ports chernaraus over, i really do. And i hope the terribly arcadey feel of flying helicopters is looked at as well. Not as excited as i once was, i feel there needs to be plenty more work on it before release.
  6. - no bipod deployment I can't believe this option isn't in the game, what kind of schoolboy error is that?
×