knightswatch

Are you being serious? Did you actually just complain about the 'Alpha version' of its lack of vehicles, weapons, etc? It seems like you've played Arma 2, so would you have ever stopped to think that perhaps Alpha was just Arma's way of showing some of their most "complete" things. Basically, just a "test" to show players the preview of whats to come? If Arma 2 had all types of things, freaking obviously Arma 3 would have similar amounts or more. Not to mention, if you took the time to quickly look at the pictures on the site, you would notice many things they haven't released on an ALPHA. I'm just trying not to be annoyed at how you somehow did not think to even read slightly somewhere about what's to come, before doing your "review".

I'm currently using 32-bit Windows 7, but obviously, like many people it seems that my fps is very low. Would 64-bit Windows 7 run Arma 3: Alpha noticeably better? Or perhaps the same, or 1 or so fps more?