geoxile

My first impression is... The engine still needs work. That's on the infantry showcase mission, getting 40-50+ FPS. I know it's in alpha but considering the state the game is in I'd assume that the engine is mostly done and they're working on the game: art assets, sounds, logic, etc. Arma 2 wasn't exactly what I'd call well optimized either. Never mind the dip in GPU and CPU usage at the end, I exited the mission. The graphics, while generally an improvement over Arma 2, don't exactly seem to size up to newer titles using new engines in terms of feature sets, but understandably, since Arma 3 isn't using a triple A engine. Yeah, I know about the draw distance and scale but that's beside the point. As for the game. Movement is definitely better than arma 2. So is aiming as long as my FPS is 60 or above. I used to have input lag issues in arma 2. Enemy AI still seems a bit wonky. They seem to be able to shoot with remarkable accuracy even when I'm behind shrubbery and other cover that should break line of sight. That's all for now, I haven't played a lot. http://i.imgur.com/jTIzpA4.png