aleksadragutin

There really is no way for whole Ukraine to be taken, and even if it is, what would this actually mean for the US? Maybe a slight change in geography class which no one follows anyway. The only people who will lose in this conflict are those who live there, cause no matter who wins, their lives will never be the same. The rest of Europe will pretty much stay the same. Besides Europe really does not wan't to go to war, unlike the US.

I'm just amazed that he had drawn a conclusion from the cluster bomb incident along the lines of "We should send them more weapons to stop this from happening". What kinda logic is that? The stupidest idea since inventing a machine gun to stop wars.

McCain is such an asshole.

Yes, NATO actions benefit the NATO part of the world, same as Russian actions benefit the Russian part of the world. This is what I'm saying, you can't make a clear black and white picture, because the world contains a million shades of gray. And to say that NATO does all of it's affairs legally is simply not true (NATO aggression in 99 without a UN resolution). You can't say that one side is evil and the other one is not. Not to mention that half of the world views NATO as an aggressor, more than half if you count all the Chinese. ---------- Post added at 10:04 ---------- Previous post was at 10:03 ---------- Nobody said it was held in 1999.

US was arming those who fought the Syrian army, and later they used those weapons to attack Iraq. It doesn't really matter to me if Russia allowed it or not, all that matters is that order turned to chaos after NATO helped the rebels (for god knows what reason, maybe oil or some other interests), and I find it a little hard to believe that pore US were naive. The fact that few representatives reached an agreement that it's legal, doesn't make it right, and are breaching the states constitution. What matters is that NATO is deciding to help rebels in one situation, and condemn them in another, very similar one. And people should know by now that it has nothing to do with freedom or human rights, and everything to do with political interests.

Because it was conducted after exiling the Serbian population which made up a majority through terrorist actions and intimidation. But that's off topic. Legitimacy of referendums is a very vague thing, and you can't deny that the referendum in Ukraine was ruled illegal for political reasons.

In Crimea there was a referendum which I know you'r going to call fake, as might many others, but the "referendums" in other territories such as Kosovo weren't any more legal than this one. Yet one is regarded as legit and the other one not so much. That's the selective implementation of the so called "international law". IS was armed by the US during the civil war in Syria, before the big offensive. Same with Libya, armed the rebels.

But there is no solid proof of Russian army invading Ukraine (if there was, we'd be at war). And noone can claim that Russians don't want independence. Plus where was the self-determination right in Syria?

Russia probably wanted the war, but would going to the UN solve anything, except giving Georgia more time. Again, do you think NATO countries would pass that? ---------- Post added at 19:31 ---------- Previous post was at 19:27 ---------- Ok, then tell me what's the international law behind forceful removal of territories here, that US and it's allies imposed? The same countries that are criticizing the invasion of Georgia and the rebellion in Ukraine (while supporting those in Libya, Syria).

Japan definitely has the right to attack ISIS, and it would have the right to annex them if the territories were inhabited by Japanese people.

I think it's safe to assume that Georgia was well aware that they will get their ass kicked. And if Russia went to the UN, do you think NATO countries would just let it roll and approve it?

They probably knew it was coming, and can you really find a diplomatic solution to a dispute such as this? Would Georgia be willing to budge? Obviously no. Would Russia give in to the pressure of little Georgia? Would anyone? Even the UN can't solve the disputes, they just go about with their resolutions, which are empty letters on a piece of paper.

For example Africa.

For those of you interested, no, we're not dead. And just to show you how alive we are, here's a sneak peek. http://www.dodaj.rs/f/2k/eD/4yLj86l9/m10ss5.jpg (139 kB)

It's a public secret that US had a part in the unrest, and maybe they still do.

Oh the irony, a member (or a former member) of our SNS party is on the battlefields, while SNS is ruling here. They were a far right, and now since they won the elections, they shifted to the left, and continued what their predecessors started.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0i9VaaCmXEs

Actually, not much difference between annexing. People get ruined in both situations. Jobs destroyed, shopping power lost, so not much difference. ---------- Post added at 22:49 ---------- Previous post was at 22:48 ---------- And yes, US likes puppet governments to do the work for them. But US invaded more countries than I can count. Cuba, Vietnam, Korea, Iraq, Afghanistan, Serbia, Libiya, plus supporting couple rebellions.

Yes, but I'm talking about events after the revolution, very similar to the one in Ukraine, which allowed this kind of rise of corruption. I can feel for the people of Ukraine, but they are not realizing they're being manipulated on both ends.

I believe you, but here's the brake down of the events following the pro western revolution in Serbia. 1st all military secrets lost, programs canceled, 2nd appointing executives in state firms on political party bases (democratic party off course), that used their positions for personal and party gain, 3rd selling ruined firms to foreign investors at ridiculously low prices, 4th paying the investors our selves, 5th taking back the firms along with investors depts, 6th taking so much bank credit to fix the situation (off course in foreign banks), 7th falling into dept slavery, 8th ending up with the shitty situation we have today. Not to mention that all of this is accompanied by a type of EU inquisition(which one of our satirical shows well portrayed), forcing Serbia to humilify itself. That's what I think is going to happen in Ukraine. They can't trust Russia, but it's stupid to think that they can trust US and EU.

That all sounds nice in theory, but it's a bit different in practice. You don't know how things went down here, and most likely, that's how it's gonna bee in Ukraine.

This is not such a strange thing at all. One could argue that foreign companies are enslaving countries. Taking over their economies, and the countries winding up in dept. It's how it was here, but you wouldn't know that.

So looks like OSCE is not neutral, separatists firing on themselves, and all of that sounds way more likely then just UA making a mistake. Come on, you can't just blame everything that happens on the separatists.

Now that's just irresponsible. You create a meat grinder, send one unit to fend off Separatist attacks, and then blame failure on something else, shifting the blame away from yourself.

We have encountered a bump in the road, in the form of one of our main members being busy with his personal life, so we can't release the update until he polishes a few things out. That doesn't mean that we are sitting still. We have planed a couple of new things, main ones being our own optics and attachments and our vests. We also have a few unannounced surprises.