aleksadragutin

Not lording. It's more like exploiting.

That's not the definition, that's your opinion. But the fact is even a candidate is not completely sovereign. Example: EU tells Serbia "don't raise export to Russia", and the government says "yes, we're sorry for even thinking about it", when our interests are to use the opurtunity. And then when we complete one condition, they make up a new one. First it was deporting "war criminals", then "normalization of Srb-Kosovo relations". And the promised billion euros for flooding aid, guess again it was 10 million, and a loan no less. In the end we'll be paying them. Goes to show that a land of milk and honey doesn't exist. Ps. Russia gave us 30 mill. of no return aid + equipment and manpower for the mentioned flooding, And what do we do? We listen to EU and deny Russia more products when they need them.

That is arguable. They can also add conditions on top of that. And when a country is stupid enough to cater to their every whim...

You say that but do you have any idea how membership would improve the life quality? The thing about getting a country EU ready is adopting their law system. What does a country gain by doing this? When you join you get quotes, meaning that the surplus of products that you make, and that is threatening to be to much of a competition for Europe, gets destroyed. And that is just one of many steps you take to ensure their dominance. What do you gain from that?

Another thing is that "civilized" status is awarded by joining EU and thus supporting their policy. I mentioned earlier that no EU country is truly sovereign. When you join you have freedom of choice to choose which pants to wear, but you can't control your market, your economy, make your own laws, pick friends and enemies, have your own foreign policy. So to say that you are civilized because you let others enslave you is absurd. Sadly, my country goes head first rushing into joining EU without really consulting anyone.

Let's take a look at the 80's in the US. People were so terrified of commies back than and it was all state orchestrated. If a US soldier was to capture USSR soldiers he would definitely mistreat them in some way. So you can't say that democracy makes it better.

You all really think that this kinda thing wouldn't happen with UK, USA etc. Why? People better? NO. Look at sick twisted people every country spawns. 100% in any war anywhere anytime you would have mistreatment of POW. What you're saying is absurd. It's almost like saying that west i incapable of war crimes. ---------- Post added at 20:57 ---------- Previous post was at 20:52 ---------- The whole US intervention is based on a principle where they make war legally, but the war as a whole is a far cry from legal. So yes, US has crimes organised on state level.

War is shocking man. And everything that comes with it. This is war. But am I surprised this happened - no. You could only be surprised by this if you haven't seen war.

Not defending anything. Just saying the truth. You think that only they could be so savage, but that's not true. The truth is that this is in human nature, and no matter where the war is you would have stuff like that. Be it Ukraine, Yugoslavia, Afghanistan or Middle East.

It is not that shocking. If there was a conflict in some other part of Europe the same would probably happen. It's the thing about all wars.

Those systems are not aimed to protect you. If Russia wanted Poland leveled, it could do so. The system aims to protect those behind you. And no country in EU is truly soveirgn.

Or will it?

Which wouldn't have happened if not for the attack of protesters on the Maiden.

What's that about?

But this fails when it comes to terrorism.

Yes but it's different when a country actualy arms the jihadists.

There are Albanian Jihadists fighting for IS. NATO basicly let them run wild. Everything is conected.

Albania did this on our teritory and when we defended our selves, NATO bombed us because we were "endangering human rights". They had the right to express them selves and they did this by burning our churches and houses.

So another Crusade then? ---------- Post added at 22:27 ---------- Previous post was at 22:23 ---------- Orthodox c. has "post"(around holydays), its when people are not forced, but chose to not eat anything of animal origin. It is good for the organism and people show their respect for the religion. Why does this bother you so much, when people actualy chpse to fight to have even more restrictions.

That is a very philosophical question, which does not have a simple answer. Those people were living like that for thousands of years. You can't just expect them to change. ---------- Post added at 22:11 ---------- Previous post was at 22:08 ---------- Every cultute has it's restrictions, for example why can't someone buy heroin in the US, or play wolferstein in Germany? It's just different restrictions.

Who are you to say what's extreme. They might concider it very tolerant. Who knows, maybe something even worse pops out. And people keep confusing tyrany with dictatorship. Those are different things.

Doesn't have to mean so. Someone can be educated and still want a firm ruler. The problem with extreme Islam is that people were telling that crap for so long that they started to believe it them selves. I have nothing against religion, and I respect my peoples religion as tradition, but there is a huge difference between normal healthy religion and what they are doing. About education. Even if they wanted to educate anyone, they couldn't, because they have no means of doing so. No schools, no professors, and executing students probably doesn't help either. ---------- Post added at 21:44 ---------- Previous post was at 21:39 ---------- Dictator and a ruler are 2 different things. Tell me what's wrong with one man in charge. You can also be oppressed in a democracy. Like the US has only 2 partys so which ever they chose they wind up with the same thing. And fragmented government isn't good either because nothing gets done. The trick is making you believe that you have a choice.

I think I spotted a new vest model in the virtual arsenal. Is there something like that or have I made a mistake? If true will there be more on that topic?

Why the antisemitic tone?

That's your opinion.