aleksadragutin

I know there is a thread similar to this one but it doesn't provide me with an information i need. So I'm new to editing arma games and I'm making a weapon addon (something basic so I can get a hang of it) and I cant seem to find (in the example m16a4 model or it's config) what is controlling the position of hands on the weapon (so the hand isn't 10 cm behind where it should be). I don't need to change the hand itself (from open to fist for example). Do I have to edit the skeleton? Thanks in advance.

Don't worry he's fine. He was on a holiday.

Yes, we are somehow going to implement it in the game.

It's from Marmoset Toolbag 2, as well as the other models.

Here's another version of the M-70 (M-70AB2) retextured.

Hvala, thanks :D

There's no such thing as spamming :D

Before you pull any more info out of your ass, Croatias borders were drawn up artificially regardless of majorities or minorities, same as Crimea which was always Russian and has a Russian majority was artificially joined to Ukraine. Skadar is also an old Serbian town, does that mean we have the right to invade it and chase of the Albanians living there now? Are you saying that there were no attack on retreating columns of Serbian civilians? You are well known for pushing the "they just packed up and left, our operation had nothing to do with it".

I said that those Croats that were displaced in Croatia latter came back when the fighting stopped. The Serbs weren't given a chance to. Their property was seized by the state of Croatia (how's that liberating?). Are you justifying the cleansing with "well maybe they would organize another genocide if we don't stop them"? What right did Croatia have to the land in which the Serbs were a majority, they have the right of self determination too, don't they? What can you say that possibly justifies the expelling of 220k civilians, seizing their property and not allowing them to come back?

Thanks. If you mean the uniform and equipment camos, we will have the M10, M93, MDU02 and Woodland for now. We will probably add more later on.

You are obviously not following here. This was a single operation expelling 220k people in a couple of days. The total amount of refugees in the whole war is much higher off course. Also I said 3000 civilians killed or MISSING. Are you saying that strafing of refugee columns is something to be celebrated and praised? All those Croats that moved, were inside Croatia, and later when the fighting stopped they came back, while during Oluja Croats simply concluded that they left the houses to them. You still have people with unresolved living situations. The first shots were fired when Croats and Slovenians started attacking the retreating columns of JNA. Then the Croatian "government" excluded all Serbs from the state apparatus and removed Serb status as constitutional people. In the area of Knin the Serbs were a majority, and Croatia had no right to claim that land, besides some artificially created lines during the communist era. Even IF the Serbs started everything, even IF we were an aggressor killing innocent Croats, even IF we banished hundreds of thousands of Croats (which is ridiculous and has no base in reality), Do two wrongs make a right? Is that wrong so right that you have to make a parade out of it? Let's talk about acknowledging own mistakes. As I seem to remember our prime minister went to Srebrenica to pay respect, when he was greeted with stones. I don't remember Izetbegovic being stoned in Belgrade. Did any muslim go and pay respect to 3000 innocent Serbs killed by the gang from Srebrenica? Have Croats ever said they're sorry for kicking hundreds of thousands from their homes, or for murdering 700000 Serbs in WW2?

Truly shamefull. While someone apologizes for their war crimes, someone else is proud of them so much so that he throws a parade. You're celebrating the operation in which 3000 civilians were killed or missing, and 220000 expelled from their homes. Talk about double standards. It's a single largest ethnic cleansing operation since ww2.

Finally have something to show. It's an updated M-70B1 model, with brand new textures.

Actualy, what vilas is saying applies to Serbia too. And the most of the countries where oligarchs rule.

I mostly agree with you vilas.

I'm afraid that it's not ready yet. I'm on vacation so I won't get to work on it for a week. However, I did make a nice progress with the armoured vest. You can expect a pic soon.

The problem is EU doesn't want a proper democracy. It wants an obedient one. Take Greece, they had a referendum, they voted no - EU does not approve, cipras removes anyone who voted no from the government and says yes - EU approves. There's the irony.

Well that's the problem. In Iraq you had Saddam, a firm hand. He was replaced by the slightly less firm US Army, and you already had little trouble. As soon as the US fell back, you had no firmness and all hell broke loose. ---------- Post added at 19:35 ---------- Previous post was at 19:34 ---------- Cleaning the streets of mafia?

I have said no such thing, you are clearly trying to be hostile and twist my words.

Same in serbia 2001 onwards.

Regarding the right sector. Regardless of it's political views, it tryed to enforce some kind of law and order, while the government goals are basically mafia. I hate nazis as much as the next guy, but order is somethong that I highly value. Regarfing everything else, if you can't make a conection between NATO expansion and the conflict, there's nothing I can still do to make it more obvious.

Naming a coup "democratic revolution" does not change the fact that it is a coup that half of the country doesn't support. Yes, by civil war I mean the current conflict in Ukraine, which actualy is a civil war. The fact that NATO doesn't want Ukraine in it's current state is a proof that the Russian strategy worked. Reading from past news, Right Sector was actualy figjting for a good cause. It's the government mafia that is the problem (which US and EU supports, as u said). ---------- Post added at 19:11 ---------- Previous post was at 19:05 ---------- I was actualy refering to this. I think it was hard to reach any deal after the coup.

The whole reason I even mentioned the crisis was to give you an example of a nuclear power being threatened by having enemy bases close to it's borders, since you said that Russia shoudln't be threatened by NATO bases in Ukraine.

Yes, a big part of the population wants to move towards NATO, but a bigger part that voted for Yanukovich didn't want that. But a coup was made legit and now armed gangs rule and you have a civil war. You don't see anything odd about US and EU supporting this?

NATO is an organization under the control of the US, that is fighting for US interests under the paravan "organization of countries". In the end it is Ukraine who decides, but it gets a little "push", from it's western partners. One of the reasons for supporting the coup was that the new government will move towards EU and eventually, NATO.