So , i just did a test with Fraps to see wich game is the more '' Demanding'' , so i downloaded the AiA Mod for ArmA III , and compared with ArmA II on the same places
Just did a few screenshot to illustrate that :
First ArmA II Screens and FPS
[img ]http://cloud.steampowered.com/ugc/576735140866189277/1DB067BE9DB75962EE4C7A17A2025730F1BAC0C5/[/img]>100kb
51 FPS on it , settings in the following screen
[img ]http://cloud-2.steampowered.com/ugc/576735140866197805/BEE5749DBCD529BD2B3B4DBA70D9E49806E2C5B5/[/img]>100kb
Texture quality : Very High
Memory : Default
Aniso Filtering : Very High
AA : Disabled
ATOC : Disables
Terrain quality : Normal
Object Quality : Low
Shadow Quality : High
HDR : Normal
+ FXAA Sharp Filter on High
Post Treatment : Normal ( Please , don't kill me )
VSYNC : Disabled
Now ArmA III !
[img ]http://cloud-2.steampowered.com/ugc/576735140866264477/DA02AA14CCAC5DE3D9F60D0EE6B9F8574B1FE9B5/[/img]>100kb
Now here , fps looks nice , 50 fps too here , same settings as in ArmA II ( Some options Exclusive to ArmA III like PIC disabled)
ArmA II , Tchernarus Island
[img ]http://cloud-2.steampowered.com/ugc/576735140866219081/CD1CC3CAD4758E87F20F6D4055DC1E403D072A87/[/img]>100kb
Ok , 30 Fps here , in front os Chernogosk on ArmA III , but still looks playable
[img ]http://cloud-2.steampowered.com/ugc/576735140866295927/F2122C716B4CA927B0357EAE3F95F7E87E16FA42/[/img]>100kb
On ArmA III , 25 Fps , a little loss , but nothing dramatic here
Also , i noticed lower FPS in air on Arma III !
[img ]http://cloud-2.steampowered.com/ugc/576735140866310004/3BBA362088F3E3ABA25FA93AB1B432FBC0134019/[/img]>100kb
15 Fps Here !!!! , on Arma II , it's the opposite , more FPS on Air , lower on the ground !
That conclude my post for now , will try to do the same with the FRAPS fps counter on screen !
Configuration
WINDOWS 8
HD7770 Radeon 1 GB
8GB Ram
AMD FX4100