Jump to content

Enrico

Member
  • Content Count

    42
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Medals

Community Reputation

1 Neutral

About Enrico

  • Rank
    Lance Corporal

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Thx...Finally we can reason! I have to give 100% right about what you said. The problem, as you know, comes out with the compatibility in the servers when you enabled the mods. Unfortunately, until they released the official version of ACE for ArmA III,the most popular and easy installation whit Six Updater,the mix mods are a delights just for the SP. But yes...whit the mods it's another game..like always!
  2. Hi It 'obvious that your reasoning is correct and also right, but the problem is that you are reporting it in the wrong forum . Let's explain better. It does not matter how right can have your arguments , you must not criticize the game ... never,at least not here! Doing this only 'll trigger a chain of angry blind players, who will do anything, to discredit any fact that is not their .. that is to deny the obvious . The answers can bounce between, depending on the circumstances, .... it's just a game .... or to the opposite ... this is a SIM....etx..etx ! For each observation done there is always the answer ready recycled several times. And when it becomes clear that the problem exists,it's not a fault of the game ...but it's your Low end PC...of course!...Yes!... or the legendary bottleneck that we all dread. Sometimes, I think,that they are paid by others to want the Castel of paper remains standing to make it appear solid and well made. The forums where gamers talk about ArmA III, on the net, are full about to claim a better finished product with the feelings that you have listed in your post .... but it's a losing battle even before you start ... then forget it. Track issue,opinons,advice...you can write what you want,they always go their own way ... because how always i repeat for fun: Como on folks..after all...this is ArmA! ... Right? It look like... take it or leave it! Regards
  3. Enrico

    AA Batterie-Radar e Chopper

    DCS Black Shark it's a great game,i come from to fly sim after 10 years,for that reason,i repeat,that it's silly and out of place a Chopper fighter Arcade without a right AA System in ArmA III. ArmA it's sim game infantry...so..welcome every Veicols-Tanks-Choppers-Planes,but just for fun and to accompany the mission to the victory...but just accompany,or we risk to unbalanced the real spirit, about this title, to the hundreds FPS where the Kingdom of Caos is a must!
  4. Enrico

    AA Batterie-Radar e Chopper

    Nice! Before you wont give, still ,more chance to survive to the Choppers Fighters,whit a correct chaff-flare and radar, and just later, the AA System......Fantastic!..LOL ...and what do you think that we must to do between the frist fix and the second one addon?...Play to DCS Black Shark?..Como on! ;)
  5. I do not understand the reason for the absence of the AA batteries,again, also in ArmA III. Every time that some rookie gets in relax position to 4000 meters from the taget with the his fly mowing grass (Chopper Fight),can remaps the island undisturbed by any enemy interception over 2000 mt., and also if you are lucky to lock it..after whit 3-4 flares...you will be hit again from that unstoppable playmobil toy. Something like that could be enough standard in 2035 year: http://cogitoergo.it/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/zaragoza08_120.jpg (270 kB) SPADA 2000 Ground based air defence missile system • ASPIDE 2000 missile • Area intercept coverage well over 20 km radius • Well proven in all weather conditions and ECM environments • Possibility to integrate other lightweight anti-air weapons Enhanced all weather air defence system for the protection of extended vital assets on the territory (air bases, ports, industrial plants, main buildings). With the use of the powerful ASPIDE 2000 semi-active missiles, the intercept coverage of the System is well in excess of 20 km in all directions, thus preventing launching air platforms from releasing their airborne ordnance and PGMs at shorter range. The reference system configuration consists of: • A Detection Centre, for tactical operational control • 2 Firing Sections (expandable to 4) • 1 or 2 Missile Launcher(s) per Firing Section The Detection Centre embodies the Search and Interrogation Radar and the Operational Centre into a single shelter. The Firing Section is based upon the Fire Control Centre (including the Tracking and illumination Radar and the Control Unit) and the Missile Launchers, each with 6 ready-to-fire missiles. Both the Detection Centre and the Firing Sections can be deployed around the defended object, up to 10 km relative range, to maximise the air defence in accordance with the required protection level. Easy to relocate by truck, train or by aircraft (C130 fully compatible), the system can integrate and co-ordinate additional VSHORADS and anti-air artilleries (up to 10) deployed within a 10 km range from the Detection Centre. In addition, it can be connected to a higher-level Air Defence Centre. The System is in service in Spain and Italy. System architecture • High degree of modularity and flexibility Radar coverage • In excess of 45 km Missile intercept coverage • In excess of 20 km Engagement capability • Up to 4 simultaneous engagements; more than twelve engagements per sequence Co-ordination capability • Up to 10 small anti-air weapons •Air transportable Additional features • Provision for integration with the National Air Defence centres • Built in 'simulation programme for operators' training • Mission planning capability NAME • SPADA 2000 MISSILE CHARACTERISTICS • Weight: 240 kg • Length: 3.70 m • Diameter: 0.20 m • Speed: High supersonic
  6. Enrico

    ArmA 3 1.04.111668 (update feedback)

    Why you do not read what I wrote about it? ...and just for precision,all the context,had to be already in the package realase,as it was written on the BIS title promotion, and not...step by step...like right now! I'm not a fortune teller!! And what do you think about a better optimization of the game also for the High end PC?....because that's the problem! How many people can keep stable 60 FPS,right now, on Altis map in MP? :rolleyes: But which side are you? I like ArmA so much....but a little objectivity never hurts! Regards
  7. Enrico

    ArmA 3 1.04.111668 (update feedback)

    Hi. I believe that one day, not far away, the Bohemia Interactive regret some choices done, ​​without taking into account, what it was before ArmA for the community. This new way of giving updates with the dropper is carrying a number of difficulties for developers of multiplayer events...and not only to them! It's impossible to do anything if there isnt all materials together, and BIS know this very well. So their new policy is aimed at the more casual gamer that the veterans fans,this was a title for adult audience and mature....we will see in the future if your decisions were right! The new update dosent improve nothing about optimizations in the game,what was been done to the patch vers. 1.2,indeed, there is a drop in frame rate in general, and frankly I did not feel the need for it. Of course, those who is playing in SP dosent feel the problem about MP, then there's even a campaign three new weapons ... what more could you want? Seems that every update them distribute candy to the kids...and in fact ...they treat us as such! And how have taught to answer when somebody give you a little present? Thanks!...right? Ok...thanks so much for this Chupa chups BIS! Next one?....new sunglasses?....different hat color?...a fog light for the quad? How long i must still wait just for get all packet vanilla?.....because I have a right to know, since I paid for it! After 12 years that i follow you like a great fan...this is unacceptable over that inconceivable be treated so! Regards
  8. Hi! I know that today it will be the time for the new upgrade but,right now,11.30 o'clock, steam dosent show nothing about it. You might have a bit of information about at what time you plan to........ Thx
  9. Enrico

    Rifle clips through objects

    Hi If i must be honest, i really dont care about the aesthetics,if they fix it or not...for me is the same,but to fix the hit bullett when the rifle it nearby to the objects...yes! I hate it, because for that problem,i am dead so many time and it must to be correct.....no doubt about it. regard
  10. Enrico

    Rifle clips through objects

    Hi. I havent read the reason,and you right,but it does not change the problem and what they users say about that issue. Anyway. This mind than it will be fix..or not? Regard **Plz guys vote up for this track issue...it's important!
  11. I would like to bring attention to a very important issue reported very well by GShock where track has been closed for failure to vote. http://feedback.arma3.com/view.php?id=15411#bugnotes One thing that was right to 100% and obvious has become exchange of fantasies about how and what a rifle can hit through the aim view. I dont see this issue whit the more arcade FPS title but you accept this one in a Sim-Game! Let this important bug was going through something of little importance, or even worse, that really behaves like a rifle work in real life, it means that there are too many people, who dosent care about to bring this game to a higher level but just: ...give me a weapon and target and will destroy everything! I hoped, and believed, then one of more boring and frustrating bug, then have followed the previous edition,togheter to the Aim point out of alignment in gunner seat,was correct this time! But I was wrong .. real life and some gamers live in two different world paralell where it's difficult to meet us,even though I do not understand why. Now this bug has been closed like idea, or concept wrong,thanking all those who open their mouths, and we keep this issue also in this edition. Thx! Regards
  12. Hi! I was following this Thread from the frist page and i would like spend just a few words about it. When i buy something, and it doesn't work very well,for example a TV,i must not explain, to the manufacturing production brand, how to fix it. That's their problem and their profession .... not mine. I think that it's sufficient to say where is the fault, or the problem.....in this case whit ArmA III,is consolidated a poor optimization engine....dejà vù?:o I am happy then the folks can explain so many things about how work the CPU--GPU--SSD--in this game,and this is very interesting, because,be informed is always a good thing,but to teach how should make the them job,, or even worse,to use words too much.....aggressive...it's not the right way,not for me! As a customer i wont a game, playable, to be able to have fun time without getting angry when i am playing,species in MP !!..This seems to me a very reasonable request!..over which a just right! I am ready also to invest money for upgrade my PC,no problems about it,but in this moment, that's not the solution...so!! Like so many Fans here i follow BIS from 2001...and i am aware of the problems about this title involves...but accepting it to normal routine like a blind fan...it's another thing!! I am sure that the Bhoemia staff they are working hard about it!..and i will wait a termination patch, in a reasonable time!...not after 4-5 months..of course!!..otherwise i will be forced to play with ArmA II OA+ACE+ACRE...but it would be a shame ... as well as a disappointment!! ...that's all! **..Somebody here say that ...( after all they work for money, as we all do )...correct!...for us it's a game, and we paid for it, for them it's a business...and they live whit it!!..the one can't do without the other!!....especially a Software House! This answer by hgfdsa to the Developer Maruk explain better my opinion and,,,i agree 100%. Speaking clearly and direct does not mean to be rude or impolite. Regards
  13. Enrico

    low FPS on high end PC

    Hi. Before leave this topic i would like ask you last thing. Tell me about this ways which one do you prefer: Test by yourself what you have bought, and judge later, or that somebody else do it for you telling what you bought? I know what i get.....thx! Ciao M8!!;)
  14. Enrico

    low FPS on high end PC

    ;) Grazie !....don't bother. Let me guess .... you get a Intel CPU ... right?...LOL Keep your ideals always high ... even when the facts say otherwise! Ciao!
  15. Enrico

    low FPS on high end PC

    ???? WoW..Compliment to you m8 ! You get so many PC and CPU for to be a gamer....terrific! Anyway! A)I was always in Overclock also whit 6 core (4.5 GHZ) to (4.8 Ghz) whit 4 core...so...dosent change the life...but changes like these are used in the game. B)Tell me about how many drop FPS you get whit that Intel I5---I7 vs. AMD FX 8350 in ArmA III, and if the comparison price-performance is justified,and if you are right,whit the facts not just words,i will buy motherboard and Intel CPU. If we talking about CPU i prefer update it with a modest cost ( just if there is a real drop perfomance 20% plus vs. mine old CPU) every 1 years , but whit the same socket, than risk had bought a expansive CPU whit more perfomance,in that moment, and later buying back another PC for incompatibility issue whit the new one! **...........30 FPS whit AMD Phenom X4 980 in ArmA II?.....Are you sure that you are talking about the same CPU? :)...naaaaa! Benchmarck OA was average about 58-60,and tell your friends that if you lower the video details, whit a X4 980... they can play without too many problems!..whit a acceptable compromised graphics ... obvious! Regards
×