critanium

My mistake, I should have known that Arma is demanding in more ways than a game like Crysis. Arma has to render things such as rocks very far away, even if theres no unit there. I know Arma has to calculate everything. I suppose an upgraded processor (i5 2500k) will get the job done in my price range.

In Arma 2, I experienced fps of around 25, which went even lower in cities. However, I recently bought Crysis, and to my suprise I got fps levels of 40 and above. I know Arma 2 isn't very optimized, but is Arma 3 optimized enough that I shouldn't have problems playing it? Specs: Nvidia 560ti I5 2500 (something decent, thats probably not correct)

Yeah, I'm using around $600 dollars for this game. Recently purchased a Nvidia Geforce 560 Ti and Im looking at an i5 2500k Quad core 3.3 ghz. Could this, with my GPU, run Arma 3 at high or very high? (45 fps or more).