kotov12345

same reason why Russian tanks have tanks on the back,but here on long drive only - not in the battle field. Basically they don't know what they doing.

Playing warfare/cti games last 10 years I think we need new island or islands to play good games. This is basic requirements: 1.need to be big and equal from 4 sides.Should be side should have own airstrip and some kind of big base area as we have at west of sahrani in arma. 2.shouldn't have area where AI cant go.Try to send ai from 1 point to another in takistan. Ai stack in rocks.Tanks stack etc.Ai should be useful anywhere in island. 3.Shouldn't have a lot of structures as in chernorus and all players should have good performance on it. Most structures need to be destroyable. 4.Shouldn't have big hill/mountains and big open areas and big forests .Maximum direct view is preferable around 1-2km. 5.Should have a lot of craters with diameter max 2 km which can be used to build bases inside or hide or use for unexpected attack. any recommendations are welcome. I can donate something if anyone will do it.Unfortunately I tried to start do it myself but cant really due to personal reasons.

Yes - if tank got shot to turret.This is very known problem but nothing relayed to game. I'm not talking about particularly T72.I'm talking about balance in game based on realistic facts. The fact is M1A2 hold 20 rpg shots and T90 is 8 is completely crap and called broken game play and bug. As well as same choppers blows after 2 sabots shots and T72 blow after 1. My idea not concentrate on particular models but change armor and damage for all models in game.This is very simple to change.

it is nothing relayed to problem in game on video no t90 no rpgs no m1a2. What you talking about m8 ?

it is ok politics and other crap I dont care. I only I care I want play good game when M1A2 in game hold 20 rpg7v shots it is bug.Game need complete to be reworked on balance. T90 hold 8 rpg7v shots.

utes island and surrounded by sea -takistan ground surrounded by grounded so no black border. But I'm sure doesn't matter.GPS and map stop working outside of working area.

looks like you need be gunner to do it

no argue with that - but some crew might survive sometimes.... btw in game there is only sabot and heat and heat not destroy vehicles in 1 shot :)

yes - but I'm only talking about game and game config. Game have too many simplify things now - 1 shot = full desruction ---------- Post added at 11:35 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:32 AM ---------- ok cool m8 m136 in game is not reloadable 1 shot launcher. You need install arma2 b4 argue. Just checked setting M1A2 need 20 RPG7V and 7 RPG7VL to destroy but T90 hold only 8 is this ok ? is T90 in 2.5 times weaky ? I'm talking about that some vehicles too weak in game some too strong and it lead too some vehicles stayed unusable and others uses in rambo fights....

not AT-4 - there is not AT-4 in arma2 game. Basic RPG7V which not do much damage in game. 1 hit and M113 or BTR60 get damaged wheels/tracks down or some crew dead some have injured 2 hits all crew dea etc. Same as in real life.

vehicle name,real armor ave mm,proposal damage in game (track or turret or engine), complete dastroy front,side,rea for RPG7/18/M136 ,jav /metis,smaw all cars 1,2,2,2 1 1 1 BTR60 7 1,3,3,2 1 2 STRIKER 7 1,3,3,2 1 2 M2A2 M2A3 M6 10 1,3,3,2 1 2 LAV25 10 1,3,3,2 1 2 SHILKA 12 1,3,3,2 1 2 BTR40 12 1,3,3,2 1 2 M113 25 1,4,3,2 1 2 BMP2 33 1,4,3,2 1 2 BMP3 35 1,4,3,2 1 2 T34 45 1,4,3,2 1 2 AAVP77A1 45 1,4,3,2 1 2 BTR90 120 1,5,3,2 1 3 T55 120 1,5,3,2 1 3 VODNIK 120 1,5,3,2 1 3 T72 150 1,6,4,3 2 3 T90 high 2,7,4,3 2 4 M1A1 high 2,8,4,3 2 4 m1a2 high 2,9,4,3 2 5 If this table bit complicated - for example: T72 armor 150mm average and will be nice to see in game that basic RPG or M136 make simply damage to part which was hit (dead track or gun or engine or other) and completely destroy needed 6 such rpgs from front 4 from side or 3 from rear or 2 javelins or 3 smaw rockets. Armor taken from Google and checked in different web sites.High mean cant find proper digits.

nope - looks like delay inbuilt in game

oh man :) LGA1366 is socket - it is not chipset :) as well as 1155

you cant compare I7 930 and i5 2500k because they cant be installed in same mobo. 930 for 55 chipset - i5 2500k for 67. 67 chipset will be faster than 55 no doubt - but difference in games between 2100 2300 etc any sandy bridge will be less than 5 % so if you got 100 fps - if you will buy fester cpu you will get 105 FPS which will be absolutely useless because you cant see the difference visually 100 and 105 fps and will be waste of money :) and reading test I'm not found any difference in games between 55 and 67 chipsets. In other words I put my graphic (4870x2) inside your pc you will get same fps as me :) or not more than 5-10% more which is not be visible.

may be you need produce less updates :) ? I'm still trying to get pleasure to check how good is it but never able to join any servers. When I try to check in editor I always finding bugs - like this - empty t90 when T90 hit M1A1 track was it became damaged and it really good job. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ooanGMwMs44

all servers uncompatible with current undate using six updater

why I cant see more 1-2 servers where play 5 players only ?

lol you don't know hat are you talking about m8. Ghost from HOTSHOT overclock his cpu to 5 or 6ghz and not got any fps more in arma2 - I asked. I currently use I7 930 and 100% sure if I overlock it I'm not will get any more fps at all. Read more tests and reviews about effect different computer parts in 3d gaming.

looks really nice

Overclocking CPU not give any effect in arma2 I had Pentium D 940 and clocked it from 3.4 to 4.2ghz - not single more FPS. Changed Graphic card from 7900GTX to 4870X2 got 250% speed (from 10 to 25 fps) If you have limited cash buy ram + graphic - more cash - buy mobo - more cpu. for last 5 years I changed like 5 different cpus and 5 different graphic cards and 2 chipsets.

complain about what even damage done to m1a1 from side lead to damaged truck any damage done to t72 lead to destruction.Even Mi24 and mi8 hold 3 sabot shots.UH60 AH64 and AH1 2. Idea was clearly described in first topic and ticketed.Pufu right - BIS (Kju) declined to change anything.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L-DSJ9ZDZmg

first you need use dual channel ram - You need use 2x1gb or 2x2gb stciks of ram put them into yellow or black slots. Using 4 sticks same time is not recomended. second I suggest you buy better graphic card gt220 is one of the cheapest. CPU is not very important in arma2

is this really looks like war forum or game forum? on my web page says: Bohemia Interactive Forums > BI MILITARY GAMES FORUMS > ARMA 2 & Operation Arrowhead > ArmA 2 & OA - SUGGESTIONS ARMA2 & AO SUGGESTIONS! :) again who cant read it : ARMA2 AND AO SUGGESTIONS :) for who not understand what I'm talking about. I'm talking about broken game play. watch: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l9YXHz1G_gE and next video will be soon.

you all right but really small problem: game not even close to realism and my idea only to make game better. It is not about politics or whose tanks better. It is request to give all tanks in game abit longer life. Even choppers in game hold 2 sabots shots Kju rejected ticket - so actually this is not actual anymore. c u PS Really fun when someone have washed brains.M1A2 can be out of battle with 1 RPG shot.Check documents.