-Luc-

Hi, That plane is fantastic! Thank you! It's a little bit strange to see that blend of AG and AA weapons. It could be nice to have a pure AA version (only AA-3s/AA-8s - no rocket or gun pod) of that plane... Thank you again! -Luc-

Hi, Nice work... Really. Do you plan a plain green version as we saw in the last parade in Moscow? Thank you? -Luc-

Hi, Maybe... But I'll wait to see if something like CSLA come out. Otherwise, ARMA 3 has little interest for me because the choices ​​BIS made. Right now I'm more interested in Iron Front-Liberation 1944. I prefer WW2 era rather the futuristic approach of ARMA 3. Thank you, -Luc-

Hi, Because I like BIS and their games... I think it's important that people can express themselves without fear of being ridiculed... I'm with BIS since the begining, I wont stop follow them because they choose a new direction. I just want more mature discussion between members. Otherwise a forum is much less useful and beneficial. Thank you, -Luc-

Hi, You know, people's attitude was very bad for several days. The member who did not join the majority view have been treated any names. We do not joke with respect ... As you can read in the comment after you... there is always something negative. I'm just asking for more respect between membres, that's all. :confused: Thank, -Luc-

Hi, It's automatic these days... When someone is not, or do not think like you, there always a way to denigrate, laugh at him. Frankly, this attitude is bad, and not far from: ''You are stupid and ignorant.'' No I voted NO and I dont have a laptop... CPU: INTEL CORE 2 DUO E8400 3.00g/1333/6M/S775 MB: S775 ASUS P5Q SE P45 PCIE HDRIVE: SATA2 250.0 SEAGATE 7200.10 16M ST3250410AS SIMM: 2x (KINGSTON KVR 800MHZ DDR2 NO-ECC 4096MB KIT) CRDVIDEO: ASUS PCIE GF9 EN9800GT MATRIX 512M BOX CRDSOUND: C LABS SOUNDBLASTER AUDIGY SE OEM OPSYS: MS-WIN VISTA HOME PREM X64 Thank you! -Luc-

Hi, I'm agree with you... I'm an old fart too... -Luc-

Hi, I'm agree with you. The bigest accessibility problem is that we have to download XGigs to be able to play. That's why I'm saying we need good content from the start and MODs and ADDONs are not the solution, they are a plus. I'm turning 30 too and I understood then young people (not everybody but a lot) want something easy, fast and flashy. Some of my younger friends are like that when we play OFP or ARMA. First they want an assault rifle, 2 minutes later a sniper. Because they died, they ask for a tank a tank the next play because they think they will kill more and faster... Again, they die and are frustrated. They are always going alone and die fast... It's not only in the game, it's like that in life too... I understant that BIS want more customer and they give what most of the youger people want, that's ok, but I think we are lossing the specificity of tha serie... Plenty of other game offer that. Only my opinion, maybe I'm an stupid, ignorant, disconnect person but its what I think... -Luc-

Hi, Ok... we saw: RAH-66; Merkava 4 with Trophy and pulse gun; A blend of Mi-28/Ka-52; Iranian futuristic soldiers driving IDF vehicles; Fictive boat ... How I could create a Cold war or today scenarios with that stuff? Please tell me... 90% of what I saw will be unusable for something else than the future. Thank you, -Luc-

Hi, I wont buy; I am one of 11 who have said. I dont want to play BFBC2 too... I'm for a good realitic simulator to reproduce RL situation... You should read better my last post... Thank you, -Luc-

Hi, I am a supporter of the simulation. I played many times the official campaigns and scenarios, but more often, the missions I created myself. When I create tasks, I need: - A good idea; - A good map; - Weapon systems; - How to use the editor. I do not need tutorials, I have knowledge of the military art through my reading and research. I need a good engine and a large realistic content to realize my original idea. I do not expect that be easy, but I expect to have the elements to do so. The content of OFP, ARMA1 / 2 was good for that. ARMA3, from what I know so far, will be much more limited, confined to the future. In OFP, ARMA1/ 2, I could create all sorts of scenarios (Cold War, post Cold War, contemporary). With the futuristic approach, we lose that opportunity. Please dont say me that there will be mods and addons, I dont want enjoy a game 1 or 2 years after purchase. For me, the content is as important as the engine when buying a game. This time I'm not satisfied yet. Because it is a sim until now, it was less accessebil and thats normal and ok like that... Thank you, -Luc-

Hi, Your comments are good, but not everyone like you... Thank you, -Luc-

Hi, I'm fully agree with Magog. He explains in a much better English than me (not my first language) what I think of ARMA 3. I'm also surprised by the immaturity and lack of respect of the mainstream tenants. Thank you, -Luc-

Hi, Each time a head explodes, an arm or a leg torn off, think it's you... I don't think it's... ''cool'' and I don't think that will be needed in a video game. Just my opinion, -Luc-

Hi, I believe that this will be my last speech in this topic. I think it's worrying to see the direction taken by the members. If you're not with us you are against us, stupid, ignorant. It was not like this when I started following this formum (with another name) in 2001. Freedom of expression is important in a forum, it's is ''raison d'être''. Maybe I did wrong, but I think we should think about that: If 8 fans are not convinced, potential buyers will be more difficult to convince them I am sure. Anyways -Luc-

Hi, As I already said, I bought and play the whole series so far (OFP CWR, HR, RES, ARMA1, HQ, ARMA2, EW, AH, BAF, PMC) and I based my opinion on the impression that last games leave me; a very bad one. You're right, but these games are positively different from others. About MOD: They do great jobs, right, but they do what they want, how and when they want (That's ok). When I buy a game, everything should be developed. I should not have to wait for the free labor of others to enjoy it. That is why I criticize this approach as: the mod will do this, they will do that... Damn, MOD are suppose to be a + for the game, not THE game! Game wont change a lot until the realease I'm sure... They dont have time... Maybe you're right, but we rely on our opinion to buy or not. -Luc-

Hi,

Hi, You know nothing about me... so please stop your disrespectful comments. Thanks, -Luc-

Hi, Is it a forum? Can we express our opinions freely? Is not the reason for such a place? *** Sorry, but your reaction to my comments is imature and disrespectful. :mad: Why you taking so personal!? Are you BIS? Anyways... -Luc-

Hi, You know, I followed that series of games since the beginning. I am disappointed and sad... When you lose something unique in what you have a lots of hope, is like that. Perhaps it's emotional, but the disappointment is up to the expectations. *** OFP and ARMA2 are unique. Everything suggests that ARMA3 will be a flashy super lonewolf teenager game as the others... I will not follow this time. *** To be honest with you, when I buy a new computer is mainly for games. I am certainly not alone. WORD runs on a 486 ... Thanks, -Luc-

Hi, No I will not buy this game because: - I'm just disappointed with what I see; ARMA3 will not be the ultimate military simulation. This game will have lost the essence of the series. The Armaverse, will be Armaverse and that's it. - I absolutely do not want to wait for hypothetical addons; Which are less numerous. Whose release is never known. Often incompatible. (This is not against the addon makers who create wonders) - This game would oblige me to buy a new computer; What I did for ARMA2, and OFP back in 2001... In other words, I will not pay $ 3500 for ARMA3 because I dont think it will be unique as OFP and ARMA2. I will continue to play OFP and ARMA2 ... Thank you, -Luc-

Hi, I dont understand you... How it's impossible? CWC, Resistance, Harvest Red and BAF (first missions) were well done and demonstrated than OFP/ARMA is a good game. In fact, the campaign and scenarios should show us the game at its best. It's like an introduction to the game... It's like a showcase. Nothing suppose to be better than that... Thank you, -Luc-

Hi, Wishlist for the campaign: A good storyline, we follow from beginning to end. A unique character. No sudden change between different characters. A campaign in the past, the present or the near future. Something I can relate ... Interactions with the local population (alies, friends ... why not a love story? :)) Different responses depending on whether you are a soldier or a resistance member. The possibility of winning/lose the hearts and minds ... ... Complex missions and great depth. Objectives that require multiple steps (mission 1, 2 ...) and keep the ground won. Participate in a front who affects our objectives I just want a good story! For now, that's all. Thank you, -Luc-

Hi, Wishlist for the campaign: Be an ordinary soldier in a regular unit (infantry/mechanized infantry/airborne) or Be an ordinary person in a resistance movement. ... Participate to something bigger than me, which I have no real control. ... Attack, defend and retreat ... Win and lose. Feeling the battlefield as a professional soldier or as person motivated by ideals, the vangeance or despair. ... Change through time, experiences and encounters. Progress... I just dont want to be again another super hero! For now, that's all. Thank you, -Luc-

Hi, You're right, but it depends on what we speculate; if we thing a blend of Mi-28/Ka-50 is realistic, it will be... New weapons system cost so much a take more than 20 years so we have to be carefull with that. ... I mentioned sinergy, but I also want to talk about versatility A lot of people said: ''you can do want you want with the editor...'' Right, that's why the choice of the basic weapon system we get is so important; If I get a flat green/sand T-72, I can create a Cold war, mordern, futur era war between big and little state... Same thing with the good old AK-47/M16. If I get a very high tech Commanche what can I do? Use it belong US thats all. Same thing we a strange russian chopper we dont know... For example, think to that suberb Su-32/34 in Arma1/2; when we see/use it? ... I dont think we need something perfect but, good engine, versatility and synergy of weapons are very important. Thank you, -Luc- ---------- Post added at 03:53 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:52 PM ---------- I forgot, sorry. I agree with you about the game engine but please, stop with the ''community will'' or ''do it yourself'' rhetoric. Not everyone can/want create what they want for that game. Personaly, I did some maps and scenarios for OFP and it's not easy and it take a lot of time... But, must important, why do I have to work on the game myself? Why I would buy a game I have to wait for freework of others? IKEA give me everything I need when I have to work of the desk bought... I thing it should be the samething with BIS games. or At least, get a versatil conservative content. Again, thank you, -Luc-