Jump to content
🛡️FORUMS ARE IN READ-ONLY MODE Read more... ×

mbmonk

Member
  • Content Count

    10
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Medals

Community Reputation

10 Good

About mbmonk

  • Rank
    Private
  1. Your post just made me violently sick. I might pursue legal action. Calling lawyer now.
  2. The manual is a very good point. :) I think the videos are a better way to present that information, but that is just me :)
  3. Don't take this as a harsh or rude comment but have you watch the dev videos parts 1 and 3? They don't tell you how to be good at the game. They only tell you the basics of how to move your character around the environment and the basics of how to control your squad. I don't feel as if that information removes the challenge; I feel that it removes the frustration of trying to learn a deep system without adequate information being readily available. I think the videos present the material in an easy to understand fashion. I learned quite a bit from them. I only have played the demo, so maybe the full version has better tutorials, not sure.
  4. A) Low res versions? B) A tutorial menu in game that links to the videos? Since it requires an online connection to get the patch anyway, so a link might work in this case ---------- Post added at 10:51 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:48 AM ---------- Lol. I disagree. I shouldn't have to go to your website to learn how to play the game. When you get a game you don't go to the website first. You only go there if you have a problem or are actively seeking out some information. When you get a new game, you want to play it. If you put a link to the videos in the game it's self then people are much more likely to find the content. And this content is important for new players, in my opinion.
  5. It would go a long way to help new players to the series learn how to play the game. The in game tutorials are okay, but still pretty weak. I shouldn't have to go to the games website to learn how to play the game. Just a thought, Mike
  6. Lol. You have definitely opened my eyes on this. Light weight, no batteries, and no on/off switch! I REALLY like it :).
  7. That is an awesome setup. I am jealous! I might have to steal that idea for my final FreeTrack setup!!! :)
  8. I don't think you have to be an industrial systems developer to understand where Naturalpont is coming from. It's just common sense. I appreciate what Naturalpoint has accomplished. The 'possible legal issues' FUD has made it into the thread, awesome! Thread complete! Close now! I think $150 for a TrackIR is insane. You are right it's not worth THAT much to me. They can keep it, respectfully speaking of course. Using face recognition for head tracking, if it works, will render this confrontation trivial. If you can use face recognition for TrackIR like functionality Sony or MS will figure it out. Then the FPS crowds will buy the peripheral in bulk and more games will support it. And everyone gets what they want, both FreeTrack and TrackIR users, and that is more head tracking in more games. But we can keep arguing if you want to pass the time until then :).
  9. I appreciate the response. I don't care if they close the thread. I understand. I just want to voice my support/request. That task is complete now. :) Thanks for the link to the poll and the response from the devs.
  10. I would LOVE it if Arma2 incorporated FreeTrack at some point. I know the team has MUCH more pressing issues to fix so just when you get a chance take a look at it. Thanks, Mike PS: All the other FreeTrack threads were closed. So I couldn't find an existing thread to post my support for FreeTrack in Arma2. Sorry.
×