FeoFUN

Why should the people with the same PoV be an identical twins? Strange logic - are you a blonde?

This is much better than if this thread got another one fanboy puking strawberry with the Bohemia's exclusive 'A3 Vanilla' cream. Ihatecheaters has a sensible view of things and sharp sense of humor, at least.

Yes it is. Since the question about the Mi-28's service and production life has been answered at least two times in this thread.

engineers_facepalm.jpg ---------- Post added at 01:34 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:17 PM ---------- Sure. Especially if to remember when the Mi-28, ACTUALLY, entered in to the real serial production and service. BTW Apache will remain on duty at least until 2035, too. And given that each next generation takes much more time on developing and the most part of military programmes facing the delays - i won't be surprised if we'll find out that these two helicopters are still in service even in 2050(if we'll be still alive LOL). Cobra - nearly 50 years in service and still in production. Mi-24 - more than 40 years in service and still in production. Mi-8 - nearly 50 years in service and still in production.

It's harder, but still possible. In our ACE hardcore games we're using infantry ATGM's like TOW or Metis/Konkurs only with the manual tracking. It makes the game much more interesting and demand from the operator some skill to hit the target which is 2km away. Finally, it's nicely balancing the armored vehicles and ATGM's.

In the current form it isn't, but as i told it before, it may be otherwise. Just bring a simple but significant specific features to the different types of weapons. You can make the different types of weapons and equipement working by the different way, having their specific features and restrictions. As example - the command-guided ATGM's, like Vikhr or Ataka. And self-guided ATGM's, like AGM-114L LONGBOW Hellfire or Spike. Same goes to the different types of FCS and sensors. Such a little specific features could make the game much more interesting, making the different types really different. ---------- Post added at 03:14 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:51 PM ---------- You're still confusing the real weapons with some mismatches and simplifications with completely fictional ones. I can believe if USMC expeditionary forces may be reinforced with the M1A2, if they're preparing to face the enemy that has a strong armored forces or AT weapons. As well, i know that limited numbers of AK-107 is in Russian Army and FSB special forces. BTW, it would be really nice if BI, in some future esxpansion, added this thing. This is an incredible and pretty futuristic project of the light CAS/COIN/RECCE VSTOL aircraft made by the American students for the NASA contest. THE ARBALEST: IRREGULAR WARFARE AIRCRAFT

You fixed nothig - because all the weapons and equipment were real. ---------- Post added at 12:11 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:09 PM ---------- TOH model is fine, but there is a second, even more significant question - weapons and their functionality.

How is THIS a trolling? It's a fair and simple question.

What type of war? Fictional or real?

What for? To play it alone?

You've made a nice point, daellis94. OFP, Arma1 and 2 weren't a geographic simulators - so no one complained about the fictional islands because the arsenal was pretty real.

I didn't dictate anything. And please, can you warn the people like Maionaze from their manner of discussion with a name calling and personal insults? Then everything will just fine and polite. If you didn't notice, i prefer to back my point of view with the facts and knowledge, than with a name calling and insults.

I'm not poking the people who have something more in their argumentation, than 'troll' and 'fool'. He started it - he deserved it.

Looks like you have too much of maionaze and too little brains in your head. Next time, try to bring something more solid and intelligent into discussion about the authenticity and accuracy of the combat simulations. Until that, GTFO.

^Nonsense. I think i must learn a little more about the dynamic flight models. More, than just a beautiful acronyms. For you, the PhysX is a some sort of the magic wand, but it's just an engine, that need the proper and detailed physical/functional model of the simulated object. BIS may do whatever they want, but call it 'accurate' and 'authentic' isn't fair. Fictional - that's the word.