calm_terror

that is illegal. anytihng made in o2 can only be used for ofp

i think one problem with air defence systems is most people make them 100% hit. i know the problem with that one russian air defence system dkm made awhile ago was the scripting made it impossible to even target by ground units and it lagged like an mofo. but that is not the point. for air defence systems they need to be less then perfect and not hit their target 100% of the time since true ecm systems are not in ofp.

yeah well if you want to hear all the users bitching aboot why is there no silenced verisions. etc. and silenced weapons are used veyr heavly in hostage rescue ops. and other covert missions not just the raid an "refugee" camp but the deep strike get in get out don't get caught missions. you know the stuff you don't actual read aboot or hear aboot.

actual i have seen the negev used alot with scopes and acog. it was designed to be an lmg as well as an assualt rifler and as an sniper rifle. and the onyl reason it has an silncer is do you want to do covert mission with no lmg? hell if you wanna get anal i should make the rocket launcher verision too since it was also designed to fire rifle grenades/rockets.

the best uparmoured humvees. lol [im]http://www.isayeret.com/vehicles/hummer/2.jpg[/img]>100kb [im]http://www.isayeret.com/vehicles/hummer/16.jpg[/img]>100kb even these are not as uparmoured as I have seen just can't find the images right now eh most likely the mods will be anal and say 100kb blah blah blah evne tho they ar eonly 50kbs over.

ick i hate those include files it is such an bitch to find the thing you need to change.. i prefer all in 1 config.

laserscan stuff just means it will look and lock onto lasered targets from like an blackop with an LD. etc. and for some reason there is also things in configs that do nothing because BIS was to rushed or lazy to make them work. the irscan means it will scan in the ir wich is actual just radar in ofp. but for some reason BIS called it IR. the actual increasign the accurcy of the rounds falls into the ammo itself and not the armour. you cna limit the "ir" range of an tank tho so it can not really "see" past 1km the max usable range is liek 4km's and even then the ammo falls short evne missiles. as i tried to make the lost brothers apache enage and use hellfires out to the normal range of 4km's and the missile travels out aboot 2.5 to 3km's and explodes before reaching the target. even tho the range set for the ammo and helo was out to like 8km's or something. and of course the max visual range in ofp is 5km's and i don't know anyone who actually runs at that.. for the most part you have to jsut test each config value thing to see if it really does anything

5 min search.. wich you should ahve doen on your own. from here

yes

what is the colour scheme for the IAF uh-1N? we ahve it in that brown and weird IDF green and from I have seen in photos those ar ether 2 colours used.

land rovers? are you sure that is the CIA?

ok rhs configs RHS config

that link i posted of sig configs actual had the rhs t55 in it. since they are actual tagged with "sig_"

well egypt tungsen rounds are veyr high quality they are made the US. i forget their name but it is this long title. syria's are the same as iraqs home made rounds baed ont he russian rounds. i am sure there is some sites aboot the quality of ammo used. i did find once an good site aboot russian tank ammos this one soem very good info. I might look later for info on iraqi and syria ammo. but anytihng made out side russia was usually pretty poor. like romainin rpg-7's were very veyr poor compared to the higher standard russian and czech.. and iraqi KE rounds were completely crap compared to the russian standard. if i can find some info on it i will post it

there is another factor to put in alot of countries either use shitty poor quality KE rounds like iraq and syria. made with poor metals like lead or iron instead of tungsen or DU. or evne poor unpure tungsten. then some countries like egyt and israel who use very high end and high quality tungsten. then also you get up to DU used by russian(some tungsten still used), USA, UK, maybe france and unconfirmed Israel. but then even in DU you can end up using poor quality DU like russia with all their buget problems or evne some shit hole like iran or north korea who might try to make DU rounds but use poor quality. then you also have the cray factor KE rounds lose like 90% of their kill power at 2km's or less. alot angle would effect how bad the round hits. like in the merkava mk4 the steep angle on the front turret would help some. so just because an round is named the same does not mean it is the same big case in point iraq.. as for the merkava taken out by an bomb. there is a few things 100kg's of like C4 does not = 100kg's of tnt. my memory was schetchy aboot that anyways . also does not say if it was an sharped charge or just a pile. just c4 or tnt or an case bomb etc.. hell it could have been an rigged up line mine.. but yes the bellies of most tanks are very weak. tho israel is one country to learn and improve. unlike the US wich ignores alot of lessons leaving thin armoured roofs, lack era, etc. israel goes oh ok so let's change that. they could have already began uparmoring the bells of new merkava mk4's who knows. and FireflyPL is correct aboot the jewish life thing plus have you ever had an worried over bearign jewish mother nagging you aboot their son? lol and it is actual more then jewish life it is the life of every israeli citizen be they jew, arab, christian, dru, and any other serving in the zionist aggression force.. er i mean the IDF.. lol

yeah basically. if it does not hurt how our armour stands now. since it is pretty realist.. what is needed is for me to add new armour classes to the armour structures. ie sides back turret sides etc. i beleive only 1 merkava mk4 has ever bene disabled and that was only with like he = to 1 ton of tnt placed under the road and detonated right under the merkava. and the crew walked away.. but also you ahve to factor in the range and speed of armour too. since the merkava mk4 is slow but long range the m1a1 is very fast but short range. take a look at the egyptian m1a1 it is based on sigs m1a1 but tweaked.. it does fair well agaienst the merkava mk4. but yes the merkava mk4 is the breast of tanks the normal armou over the back door is like 10 inchs of steel plus the special armour.. israel's number one consern is crew survival since israel is liek an 10th of the man power of her enemies. and the human life is more important then the machine. but yeah if the merkava mk4 had actual armour settigns for sides and rear then the tracks could be lowered and it would be disabled easier. also our armour is always set veyr high ont he barrels since it is veyr veyr borign 2 shots in the barrels are always disabled.

is there any photos of other gear besides the ak's? like at weapons, etc?

the body armour is the wrong colour. most marines i have seen in iraq and stuff have tan body armour not many still have green.. tho i do see soem is an icky tan a little too bright. but i like the new marpat it looks better not so dark.

red tracers are only for m16/4's not mg's.. i noticed soemthign else that kinda is nto right. int he loader's position the ammo storage behide him. is open that door should be closed. no gunner would leave it open for longer then to get the round out... i know you did it for detail butit really should be closed.

wow this is really cool soem things can be improved but this is an very nice start.. and they actually look good with BIS tracers. these give the tracer and size and the bis tracer gives the streaking look. very well done. can't wait to see some improvements.

oh wow this is really nice it does look better then any other tracer script i have seen

ok i guess since people don't really understandwhat i mean here.. what i mean by this tank sucks againest infantry is the fact they don't enage infantry correctly or completely ignore infantry. half the time they fiore the main gun at them usign SABOT. it just seems kinda bad when 1 infantry squad will take out an m1a2 with no one even hurt.. it needs to enage more with the MG. and see infantry better. also the tracers are pointless if they disappear after more then 2 infantry squads are on the map. I am not sure what would make the tank engage infantry better.. eh edited to be more "pc"

or add infantry.. this tank sucks againest infantry.

well ther eis another problem the type of materal used and who made them bdu's also effects the colour. rip stop, enhanced ripstop, and twill all look different and have an different shades. and the different companies also have different shades. the other problem is the whole idea behide the camo makes it an bitch to look correct. it is designed to be very easily blended into most backgrounds. so to the eyes it can appear different in where and how you are looking at it.the best way to look at it for comparign is flat straight on with an white back ground no folds, wrinkles or shadows. also use pure white lights and/or full on sun light.

also aboot the side armour rear, top turret, side turret, rear turret. all those can be set but you have ot edit the model to add those areas in. i think i did it to the m1 but not sure would have to look at the models again.. but you hav eot add the selection into the model then make an entry in the config for those new armour selections.