cavry

Why don't you use Anti-Aliasing? Even with my 7800GT I have AA on  . Believe me, you don't need AA on 1600x1200. At the end of the day, even on lower resolutions I would probably not use AA, because it somehow blurries the picture, but this is purely a matter of taste I guess.

Just some more data (as per request from '5133p39': My ArmA Mark Score at these settings is 2738.05 Results here Best, cavry PS: Nonwithstanding all the critics here, this is one of the most beautiful games I have seen so far.

As per request, here some screens with fps: Settings: Intro: Beach: City: Forest: Mountain: Best, Cavry

hello ck! ok, i didn't meant that "bragging" part too seriously, my point was: there would be less confusion in the sense of "wtf?! i have gf8800 at it still runs like snail circus" versus "hallelujaaah! i have gf7600 and it runs pretty good while everything on max" if only people would post a real measured numbers instead of their feelings. This "feelings filled" posts are just confusing people, and are leading into useless arguing. That's all i wanted to say. Ok, fair enough. Will post some numbers later (is FRAPS the best way to do it?). It is definitely smooth and not 15-20 as suggested, and I know what smooth is. No lag, no stuttering, definately above the level where you cant't tell a difference anymore.

Sleeper, as it is obvious that you are missing the point here, let me just express that I am not intending to bo into benchmark mode now just to prove you wrong. BTW, "Sleeper" spells 5133p3|9 in leet speech, you should change your name.

More like, my e-penis is bigger than yours  But my real reason for even responding to these silly threads are to ask this question. What drivers are you using for the 8800? Thanks for condescending to answering to my "silly thread". Anyway, Driver is 97.92, WinXP32.

My System = ~11.000 3dMark06 Top System = > 22.000 3dMark06 I would not consider my system a high end system anymore, without SLI or Quad-Core, just a reasonable Game PC. It is not new, either (Nov 06). What I wanted to know is if there is anybody else here who does NOT have performance problems (I guess there must be quite a few) on a half way up-to-date system, of if the whining about performance in this and other forums is just related to outdated hardware, creating some misleading impression for people that are interested in buying. I mean, in many posts that I read prior to buying the game, everybody literally agreed that this game does not run well on any current machine, which I now think is just BS.

Hi, I read a lot of complaints regarding the performance of this game, so I did not expect to much when I installed it a few days ago. However, on my nice (but definitely not top notch) machine I can crank up all details and settings to maximum on 1600x1200, viewing distance = 4000, and the game runs absolutely smooth, even in the forests (gut feeling: > 30 fps min, >40 on average) and just looks absolutely beautiful. Am I missing something here, or are all the complaints here relevant to versions prior to the latest patches ? Version: 1.02 (German download version) CPU: C2D E6600 @ 3.2 Ghz MB: EVGA 680i RAM: 2GB SuperTalent @ 1Ghz 4-4-4-8 2T VGA: single 8800GTX HD: 2 x 2 Raptor (System/Data) 150GB in RAID 0 (on dedicated RAID controller Areca ARC-1210)