Jump to content
Bohemia Interactive Forums

boecko

Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    122

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Medals

Posts posted by boecko

  1. Posted

    It's a conspiracy!   wow_o.gif

    It is one ... trust me ...

    apparently BIS paid this certain German ISP to get rid of the BTS, so they can announce that ArmedAssault is actually BUGFREE now wink_o.gif

    You will believe me, when the cameo uniforms will turn MAGENTA in Armed Assault 2 and the main character's name is "Robert T."  smile_o.gif

    Cheers

    Boecko

    P.S.: no... i have no extra backup ...

  6. Posted

    Currently the website's response times are unacceptably high. it takes > 1min just to load a page. what's the problem?

    The provider?

    You don't have to open a topic about that, as we can't change it.

    As long as armed-assault.de and bugs.armed-assault.net have the same response times, there is no need to report it. They are on the same IP.

    Bye

  7. Posted

    Never seen any American football games, how different is it from Rugby? Only thing I know about it is that, apparently, Scotland has a good American football team.

    My 2 cents on AmericanFootball

    * they stand around most of the time

    * more commercial breaks than real play

    * utterly boring

    * as a player, you have a lot of breaks (defense/offense crap)

    * you have to study a 1000-pages rule book

    http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.....&page=6

    Before someone ask, i've watched some WordLeague-games 15 years ago.

    Now back to real sports like "Association football".

    My favorite club signed Franck Ribery today... strike!!

    Bye

  10. Posted

    INNOCENT&CLUELESS

    +1 WL and 48h vacation for continued spamming and flamebaiting here.

    Same happens to the next one who thinks he must abuse this topic for discussion about Placebos work. Discuss this in PMs or whatever but not here.

    Hey Wolle,

    so why don't you go on and ban

    Balschoiw, Plaintiff1

    for abandoning the topic, too?

    At least, I&C delivered questions..

    regards

    Boecko

    "Vier Eigenschaften gehören zu einem Richter: höflich anzuhören, weise zu antworten, vernünftig zu erwägen und unparteiisch zu entscheiden."

  11. Posted

    Hold fire only let them holds fire until the enemy is dangerously close or when they are under fire, when you order it during a firefight it they are most likely under fire wink_o.gif

    not really .. look at Bug 2218 ...

    The AI begins to ignore the "HOLD FIRE", if the following condition is fullfilled:

    e1 = enemy (my teammate knowsabout this unit);

    m1 = my teammate;

    if ( e1 knowsAbout m1 > 0.7.. ) {

      m1 ignores HOLD FIRE

    }

    regards

    Boecko

  12. Posted

    I just tried the scripts and I'm very impressed! I have combined the script with a lower accuracy setting in the Armaprofile file. Battles are very slow and intense with constant firing.

    That's waht I like too. But your squad can run out of ammo quickly during such a firefight because it is very hard to control the AI rate of fire in ArmA - even more than in Ofp. Damn AI ignores hold fire commands once the firing has started sad_o.gif

    BIS really should work on the command interface and give us some more options there like rate/method of fire, fire sectors and so on.

    Well, vote for it wink_o.gif

    0002218: AI ignores HOLD FIRE when detected - Armed Assault Community Bugtracker

    I've made another request, referencing this thread:

    0002466: implementation of suppressive fire - Armed Assault Community Bugtracker

    Regards

    Boecko

  14. Posted

    This thread is already completely off topic, so i don't care anymore to be on topic.

    Infact right now i am playing the original demo of Ofp cwc on malden in Arma at this very moment

    Huh .. I thought, you're not allowed to talk about the fightclub?

    How could you joined the CWR-roster back in december, when you joined here in "April 2007" ?

    So either you release something to the crowd from CWC or you stop talking about it.

    This is not fair.

    bye

    :nosmilies here:

  15. Posted

    yes... i'm still in bad mood about that...

    because of this ...

    http://bugs.armed-assault.net/view.php?id=2305

    So why BIS doesn't fix this bug before complaining that exclusive content is not supported in the Community Bugtracker?!!

    these were my replies with the admin-account, because i deactivated my own account, after realizing that we (german,czech,polish,etc)-players are treated in such a nice way.

    This bugtracker is not made by BIS. I set it up with I&C.

  16. Posted

    Let me guess wink_o.gif

     

     OFP: Cold Was Crisis 1.00 - 1.46

     OFP: Resistance 1.75-1.96

     VBS1  1.75-1.99

     OFP: Elite 2.85

    Source was controlled by CVS.

    Them someone converted it via cvs2svn

     

     ArmA: Armed Assault 5089 - 5151 - ? ? ?

     VBS2 - ? ? ?

    Now the build-number is in fact the subversion revision of the main trunk?

    regards

    Boecko

  17. Posted

    Todays GameStar TV had a report on OFP2. I haven't seen it myself, but here is a small overview from Lightman:

    http://hx3.de/communi....t173602

    Thanks Lightman for his summary. Rough translation:

    -It seems the screenshot is indeed in game graphic. See also the graphic familiarity with Colin McRae Dirt.

    -The development team is 150 men strong and the title is in development for 2 years.

    -According to codemasters this wont be a ego-shooter a la BF2, rather a full blown simulation with embassy on novel AI features and team leadership.

    -The battlefield should reach a size never seen before.

    -The player should experience a in depth story and care about his teammates.

    -On this years Games Convention in Leipzig OFP2 will have it's first grand presentation.

    Please keep in mind that this is a translation of a summary of a report about the impressions after a talk with the programmers of OFP2... wink_o.gif

    Sounds interesting.

    Edit: Too slow smile_o.gif

    i was faster nener.gif

    on topic:

    i doubt, that it will so open in terms of customizability like the BIS-titles.

  18. Posted

    There was a video footage on the german GameStar TV about the title with an interview with the developers.

    Summary (from someone at armed-assault.de who saw it):

    * the screenie is ingame material apparently

    * the dev team consists of 150 people working since 2 years on the title (which i doubt)

    * definitely, it won't be a BF2-alike. It will be a hardcore sim just like OFP1 with big improvements in terms of AI and team leadership

    * very big battlefields (in scales, never seen before) :lol:

    * there will be a nice background story with characters

    * a preview will be presented on the GC 2007 in Leipzig

    Regards

    Let the competition begin

  19. Posted

    I second this.

    Playing with ECP was a different experience.

    * Swearing of the soldiers

    * helicopter radio chatting

    * grenade-effects

    * bleeding ..

    * simply everything was better.

    didn't play ofp without it anymore.

    Come back, please  notworthy.gif

    We should make a petition (or a Feature Request biggrin_o.gif)

    regards

    boecko

  22. Posted

    I'll try to adapt my ruby-importscript to the wishlist.

    It should be fairly easy to extract the list since it's just an list with items separated by "*".

    But:

    1. i will import it in a separate project

    2. Since i have not a holy-"Shell access" to the bugs.armed-assault.net-Server, i'll  generate an sql-import, whithout username-accounts. The only things, which are converted will be:

    * the text (obvious)

    * the category

    This is no great loss, 'cause most of the time, the username lacks anyway.

    Some good soul can then move the relevant issues to the "Armed Assault Features"-project. This is not too hard, because you can batch-move a bunch of issues.

    Bye..

×