[W-R] BuRNeR

LoL, You made my day ^^. Are you really reading on hardwaresites ? If yes, then you should try to understand what there is written ;). The R means rebranded ? Then tell me please which card the R9 Fury, R9 Fury Nano and R9 Fury X are before they were rebranded ? The HD5870 was nice when it was released, but do you really think it can make the same performance like the current amd and nvidia cards at the same class ? Also my HD7970ghz is a lot faster then the HD5870 on DX9,10+11 even when not more then 1gb of V-Ram was used.

I would never buy a BIS game again.... ... wait, I´ve preordered ArmA 3 Apex expansion just yesterday ! OK, I think I will buy all ArmA titles till the bloody end of this series ;). I am here since OFP release and will support this team until they stop with these kind of games.

ok, my fault. i thought you need the data for ofp 2. i did vote, but i still want 64 bit and multicpu support for ofp 2 hmm, maybe u did finished the work earlierer or we will see another addon like resisstance  we will see cya BuRNeR

hmm, i think both is usless for my system, because i can´t say what kind of system i have at release. maybe an amd athlon fx with dualcore or an opteron in a dualboard. and i think i will have a nvidia with sli or an actually ati. there is more then one year we have to wait. i hope there will be a 64 bit and multicpu support in ofp 2 for client and server

i think a realistic jumping at ofp 2 would be fine. but it must be limited because it must be unable to shoot while jumping and the endurance should be play a role. once i was playing bf vietnam i was laughing from the beginning to the end. i had a sniperrifle and was jumping like a kangoroo and tried always to shoot with the scope. it was so easy to make headshots while jumping. this is one reason that i never played it again. somthing like this sucks. i hope bis found a realistic ballance for it, then i do agree