Wonder

Freedom of speech is absolute! There's no such thing as free speech that has limits. Is it okayt to insult religions? - Yes it is! (especially the catholic church ) Is it okay to burn a national flag? - Of course! If it's your possession you can do whatever you want with it! Is it okay to mount an armed assault to a governmental building and burn down embassies? - Absolutely not! Speech is free, not action! Free speech should not be limited in any way just because someone thinks he has a right not to be offended! My view is - Express your anger! Shout in rage, but don't you dare to cast that first stone!

The current trend with high-quality aircraft (especially with gunship) addons is to use one version with different pseudo-proxy ordnance that can be mounted through the use of different scripts. These aircraft however have to be armed in the mission editor through typing the required lines in the "init"-field. Some addons like Franz&Nodunit's ones have in-built features that allow you to rearm through the use of ammo trucks, but this is through the already-cluttered action field. What if selecting the rearm action from the action menu would bring up an interface in a form of a stores list diagram showing the available weapons and the weapons loaded. To select the weapons you'd just check the boxes showing which weapons you want loaded where and upon exiting the interface your aircraft is loaded accordingly.

Please make some chanterelles and penny bun bolets! (Yummy!

Remember that the Kiowa warrior's .50cal isn't the same M2HB we're all know.

I prefer opening to openable... less action menu clutter

Sweden is not a NATO-country

Please somebody make a sardine can tank!

To tell you the truth The cockpit and the HUD needs improving too...

Err... Is that supposed to be an F/A-18A that has gone through MLU? Because A-versions don't support AMRAAMs and Australia doesn't operate C:s. If this addon indeed represents a MLU version, then why not give it ASRAAMs instead of Sidewinders?

Kak interesno!

Not really... I like DKM's Havoc!

Do you realise there is already an MI-28 available? Is that an RAH-66 I see on your site, Franze? Yes I do, but...

I'm talking about a Gaskin that uses a BRDM chassis instead of the OT

I'm talking about a Gaskin that uses a BRDM chassis instead of the OT

Is that an Mi-28 on your sig?

Yep... it's like BIS putting in a Type 90 and calling it a Leopard 2! Are there any plans for a BRDM armed with AT-3 Saggers? How about SA-9 Gaskin?

Yep... it's like BIS putting in a Type 90 and calling it a Leopard 2! Are there any plans for a BRDM armed with AT-3 Saggers? How about SA-9 Gaskin?

Laptop stolen, and now this? It's as if God doesn't want you to make these addons

LOL, yeah! You show me that again with smoke trails to indicate it's AOA and then I'll believe you actually managed to pull that maneuver!

The number of T90s in russian service is probably about the same as the number of M1A2 TUSKs in the US service.

The way I see it, anyone can ask for Rock's permission to make himself a nice AV-8B out of his Gr7 Kinda shocked to see that kind of hate mail. Luckily most of the yanks I'm involved with are okay, but then again you can't choose the people who mail to you

LOL If you won't make an AV-8B variant you're a communist!

Oooooh yeah! Looking good! Hey by the way, are you still planning to use Franze&Nodunit's AH-64 as a replacement for the BIS Apache?

Ah, in that case the Wing is looking great! BTW, are the nozzles rotated downwards before or after accelerating when taking off in STOL? I always thought Harriers first pick up speed normally and then rotate their nozzles down for lift boost, hence the nickname "jump jet"

Textures are accurate, but they seem - how should I describe it - a bit "plasticy". It seems as if it's the base colour of the model and you can't tell which part is covered by textures and which part isn't. It seems "naked" to mee. I can't quite grasp what it is with it, but maybe some 'weathering' might help? BTW: How many polys is the model?