Wonder

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (CanadianTerror @ Mar. 28 2003,06:58)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">"East"(which is more for Russia, Korea, China, Yugoslavia etc etc)<span id='postcolor'> *ahem* there are two Koreas! Luckily Korea didn't share the same faith with VietnamÂ

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (CanadianTerror @ Mar. 28 2003,06:58)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">"East"(which is more for Russia, Korea, China, Yugoslavia etc etc)<span id='postcolor'> *ahem* there are two Koreas! Luckily Korea didn't share the same faith with VietnamÂ

Apparently this mod is made from an Argentinian standpoint of view, as east side is normally seen as "the bad guys"

Apparently this mod is made from an Argentinian standpoint of view, as east side is normally seen as "the bad guys"

NH-90 Eurocopter Tiger Mi-28 Mi-24 (with retracting gear and a fixed 23-mm cannon version) AH-64D Longbow Apache Blackhawk with Gecal .50 a.k.a GAU-19 All above with features such as Incoming missile warnings, IR jammers, possibly flares, GPS maps, and HUDs (don't know about Apache's IHADSS tho)

I think the watchtower used in the airfields of most island addons is a poor excuse for a control tower. We need a better one. Like this

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (blackdog~ @ Mar. 28 2003,00:38)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">My bandwidth is slowly shrinking, I only have 300MB left for this month... but here are some screens from deadsoldier. I will be getting a new server next week though with more bandwidth. Yay!<span id='postcolor'> That sure looks great! What it's still missing are window textures. Wouldn't want the base building to look like a pile of bricks.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (coporal_punishment @ Mar. 27 2003,22:36)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Do a RAF Skin or a USAF Skin<span id='postcolor'> USAF skin? hahaha!! ...that was a joke, right?

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Chomps @ Mar. 27 2003,23:37)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">That is funny, a couple days before I read this thread I thought the same thing and actually started making one in O2. Â Then I got frustrated and quit. Â Â Hope someone else will make something like this.<span id='postcolor'> oh man! I was just a coupla days too late!

Is there any way to detect the arrestor hook position in this script, for plane addons that have working arrestor hooks? (i.e. Col. Klink's A-4 Skyhawk and RAD_F/A-18C). This script could be use for airports as well, to simulate emergency arrestor landings.

SWD? "SEALs Went Diving"? ...you probably mean SDV = SEAL Delivery Vehicle

Download here (try refreshing a couple of times, if the download doesn't start) Still needs a few things like cockpits and better physics, but it's definately an improvement!

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Landwarrior87 @ Mar. 25 2003,23:19)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">well then its an F/A-18F i want next then, and the guy who said the Brown F18's should be on East is not a bad idea, but to eliminate people from using them in east missions acting as if they really have them, both the blue and brown should be on resistance. And "Air_Rad" doesnt look to "Professional" in the editor, change it to "Hudson F18's" or something.. or "Navy Air" <-- much better. The Sonic boom is great, i love it.. cuz i made a mission while Rangers are taking over the Air Field on Nogova Desert, the F18's fly in and take out T80's and Shilka's before we can advance.. I love hearing them inbound.<span id='postcolor'> Where can I get this mission? I myself made an airbase defence mission inspired by the training we had in the Finnish Air Force. It uses FDF addons, and Lavos' zu-23, DKM XA-188 apc, and almost anything that even looks finnish. It's basically a flight of 2 hornets and 2 hawks intercepting an su-25 strike package. Too bad there are no fighters around to escort them

...canopy size, canopy frames, refueling boom, bigger air intakes, different nozzles, bigger wings, ect..

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (PFC Mongoose @ Mar. 25 2003,06:44)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Wonder @ Mar. 25 2003,04:21)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Anyone see the difference? <span id='postcolor'> Just the payloads.. unless I'm missing something. Does that requre a whole different model? Hmmm... I would've liked a Hornet for 1.46... ah well...<span id='postcolor'> You obviously haven't built plastic models when you were a child That's why I'm so into the details... Damn! I should've become a 3d-modeler!! Â

*ahem* The F/A-18F is not a specifically a "reconnaissance version" It's just a 2-seater version of the E "Super hornet". You make almost any figter a reconnaissance plane by arming it with a TARP pod. Anyway, it occurred to me when I was playing my quick multiplayer mission with this superb addon, that the "aggressors", the blue and the brown hornets, could be moved to the east side, because they are merely used to simulate the enemy fighters in trainings, not as first-line fighters. I's suggest that in the next version the brown version would be put to the east side, and the blue version to the resistance side.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">-needs a pilot <span id='postcolor'> I'd say this doesn't only apply to the F4 addon, but ALL Fighter addons A good fighter pilot addon armed only with a sidearm, lots of smoke grenades and flares, and an animating visor and/or oxygen mask would definately be in order! Someone get to it!

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Landwarrior87 @ Mar. 25 2003,04:32)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">so what u gonna do about the AI firing AA missles so often? And on Behind Enemy Lines, didnt that F18 have two seats and Two Fuel Tanks.. R u considering making that?<span id='postcolor'> The Hornet that appeared in the movie was what looked like an F/A-18F Super Hornet. And what goes to the fuel tanks, you can fit as many as 5 of them on a hornet. </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">(Harrier) (When it Comes Out, please put it in USMC Textures 2! <span id='postcolor'> I don't think the USMC uses Sea Harriers You need a whole new 3d-model for a USMC AV-8B Harrier. Sea Harrier AV-8B Harrier II Anyone see the difference?

I believe the RAF doesn't use the red-white-blue roundels anymore. Instead they use red-blue roundels. I don't think the roundels are painted on the rudder either. Instead they paint these red-blue diagonal stripes

I made a user mission to test how the AI would handle this baby. I found out that the AI would sometimes fire AMRAAMs like crazy! Sometimes AI fires amraams in salvos of 4 or 5, or maybe it just keeps firing them until the first missile hits and destrys the target. You probably should change the AI rate of fire in the config.cpp

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Beagle @ Mar. 24 2003,23:23)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">The modell and flightbehaviour of this addon is quite good, but that sound barrier is annoying... It should be raised to realistic level, around 1200km/h. Btw. F/A -18 with full payload dont want to fly supersonic, because of the high fuel consumption. It would be nice to replace the AGM 88 with Mavericks, since the AGM 88 is a anti radar Missile only... And it would be nice to make the Sidewinders at the wingtips a selectabkle weapon...that would make it a real multirole aircraft...!<span id='postcolor'> I think the sonic boom is fine the way it is... ok, well maybe it could be raised to about 900 or 1000km/h, but honestly I don't see the point in flying fighters in OFP at mach+ at angels 20 (20 000ft)! I don't really mind if the aircraft addon doesn't fly at the correct speed, as long as sub-sonic planes fly slower than supersonic fighters. I asked Hudson the same thing about the HARMs. He said that he wanted to try something different. Frankly I use Mavericks mostly to take out SAMs or AAA. Then I can safely go on strafing the other targets (unless the primary target is a tank formation). If you spot an Anti-Aircraft unit and have no Maverics, well I hope you've got a handful of flares and a bag full of luck! It was me who suggested that the Sidewinders be a part of the aircraft model itself, not as a detachable weapon. This way it would act like a tube launched weapon, meaning that when the missile was fired, the projectile would launch in front of the wingtip sidewinder, but the aircraft would look like it still carried the missiles, even when fired. The points for non-proxy weapons in O2 as I understand it are L_strela, R_strela(guided weapons) , L_raketa, P_raketa(non-guided weapons/FFARs). The chaff launcher already takes the raketa-positions, and Hudson was having problems with the strela-positions, so I guess we'll have to settle for inactive 9-Mikes for now. One intreresting thing is that if you'd have the 9-Mikes as detacheble proxy weapons, then you probably wouldn't get folding wings, because it would look stupid when the wings would fold up, but the missiles would stay hovering where they are.

6--></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Shashman @ Mar. 24 2003,226)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">lol@"Mc Donald Douglas" Â Â <span id='postcolor'> Yeah! The pilot's survival kit under the ejection seat probably includes quarter pounders with cheese, and the whole plane probably runs on diet coke! Â

The OFP community is doing its best pushing the game limitations! If Sniping out of helicopters will be made possible, then we're not far away from passengers firing their weapons thru the firing ports of an APC!

Try here

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (STS_SolidSnake @ Mar. 24 2003,00:55)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Any plans on making the wings swing ?<span id='postcolor'> According to the readme file that comes with the MFG tornado, a swing wing version has been made, but it doesn't have weapon models under the wings and the flaps/airerons won't work either.