Stag

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Unatomber @ Mar. 11 2003,11:33)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Just how would it work.. as far as i know, mines cannot be shot from anything, they must be layed. Maybe some scripting but whats the use in putting such dense antitank minefield somewhere?<span id='postcolor'> Stop tanks?

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Akira @ Mar. 11 2003,07:53)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">In a bid to help denoir move the topic...:D What if say, it WAS a WW2 memorial to the Wehrmacht? Say there were Nazi flags. Is that acceptable? Yes the Wehrmacht helped fight for the Nazi cause, and undoubtedly there were Nazi supporters in the Wehrmacht. But just as equally there were a lot that still fought that though they were extremely against the Nazi regime, since they were fighting for "Germany." General Gerstenberg (spelling I think) was an strict NAzi hater and wore no regalia of Nazi orgin on his uniform, yet that didn't stop him from defending Ploesti Rumania with all he had, and give the Nazi war machine...or more importantly the Wehrmacht...much of its oil and petrol. So WOULD Nazi flags be an affront to such a memorial? Does the Nazi flag now stand for so much that it would be an abheration?<span id='postcolor'> Yes it does. The Nazi flag was just that; the flag of the Nazi party. Nothing at all to do with the German National flag. Anybody here think that the scum that adopted the swastika did anything to be proud about? I think if Gerstenberg had lived to see that hypothetical memoral with Nazi flags on it, He'd have torn them down himself.

The majority here seem to be saying what's good about the new version, so I won't go into it any more. but I've noticed one thing I wouldn't describe as good Man that tail fan, it's perfect. The attention to detail there is superb. A masterful piece of animation and skinning. Okay, that's it, I said it. Carry on.

(bump)

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Eviscerator @ Mar. 06 2003,00:27)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (waffendennis @ Mar. 06 2003,21:23)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Well yea it would be proberley but BAS the script you are working on for the MH47E to walk in side when it's flying in mid air is it treu/fake and how far are you with it?<span id='postcolor'> There is a function on our MH-47E that, when the MH-47E is in a hover allows you to walk around inside, but if the MH-47E moves you will fall out, thats an engine problem, so in a moving C-130 you would fall out before you had the time to run out...<span id='postcolor'> Be a great timesaver though.

Nope. that was their wives.

What are you using at the moment? The magic phrase is: Alpha Channel.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Commander-598 @ Mar. 05 2003,16:42)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">At the time, Somalia was being fought over by Warlords. Not exactly military...<span id='postcolor'> What do you think those Warlords did for a living before the country went down the toilet?

Ground handling should be improved too. Even using an international airport 1:1 scale, the current herc can't stick to the paving. Get your Master Mariner's Certificate before you try to steer the C17.

Which plan views did you use to lay out the model over? The cockpit glass needs re-working a little bit, it's not as rounded as that. Try this site for a good reference: http://www.aviacherteg.narod.ru/avia....MBI.htm I'm not sure what you mean by "flattening" the .p3d. Can you explain more?

One last thing; in the editor they appear as dots rather than blocks/lines. How do I change that?

thanks for that snippet TYsiYek. @Tanelorn: The runway sections are 50x150, but are only meant to be used in predominantly flat areas, so no problems there.

IS there a limit to the size of the objects? If not, what would the disadvantage be to doing a road system as one object (aside from the fact it would be too specialised)?

Thanks Mr. K! @philcommando: I have my reasons for doing it this way. Heading 055. Can't do that easily with just a texture

Got it into OFP, but this is cropping up again. How do I prevent it?

That's a shame. that barracks is as fine a piece of work as any I've seen Go on, change the name of one of them!

It uses the same name as their barracks

You forgot "I use many of these addons, but there's no point in putting missions outside my own group because chances are people wouldn't want to chase all the extras they would require." Sad, but true.

Even sorted 3 now, but now you mention it, when I open up in OFP I get the report "Cannot open object." I've put the folder in the pbo with the island. does it need a entry in the config.cpp?

1. Bigger. with appropriately scaled taxiways, should easily be able to handle the larger aircraft which currently wander around the islands on the ground missing the runways. 2. Can easily point them in any direction you want. 3. Same as two, but it's such a biggie, it's worth mentioning twice Since posting, have solved q1 and q2, but still having problems with q3. help?

Ta.

Will the ILS work on angles other than North/South (eg. heading of 225 degrees)?

Anyone know the height ASL for Mog Intl?

Never mind, just seen it

Edited for extreme stupidity.