Tamme

80% correct.

127 Visual Methematician Never been in an IQ test before. I had some problems with the language questions, so maybe it could've been 130 if It was a finnish test.

You insulted me repeatedly over the course of your post. I guess I overreacted. Insulting others is not what I call civilized and I apologize if I did insult you. You obviously will not come to terms with my beliefs, I won't force it. There is one thing that I wan't to make clear. I have the feeling that you think I don't believe in science. Is that so?

hehehehehehehhe....uh.... no I don' get it...

I have that this year in school. Pascal If I'm correct... what the hell do you need Pascal for? Can't they teach us like VB? I once started learning VB by myself, but never really learned anything 'cause I got bored with the dull example programs that the tutorial book had.

Dude... Why don't we just start going to the bathroom in pairs?

And about the Russian one: Â wow, one sounds much less malignant than the other....and yet they have the same yield? Â Wow, I thought that it's a commonly known fact that everything that's russian is much worse than american. Guess I was wrong, that russian bomb is much more dangerous. EDIT: j/k mmkay?

Hey they're cool. I know already 8 hand signs that SWAT uses. Problem is that no one else does.

I don't understand how USA always manages to find money for military hardware or military in general. Even if the economy is going down.

I could ask the same question. WTF are those?

Maybe they did, but they'll be using it only if it suits them.

It's cool to time things like that if it's an anniversary for something good, but doing something like what they did shows bad taste and lack of respect.

I think that's repulsive, but it's just my european-pinko-commie-opinion. EDIT: Maybe they think it fits perfectly and is somehow a clever idea.

I can't see any reason why that wouldn't be fun. It must be done for OFP 2. (Not BIS, but modders)

What do they need them for? You can't use nukes like ordinary weapons, using them would have a great negative effect upon world opinion. Other thing is that "You can't have them 'cause you are evil and you don't know how to use them responsibly, but we're getting more!"

= Simulation = Action Don't they like send teams down there to cut the forest so that the fire won't spread?

Dropping waterbombs = not fun Being dropped in the middle of a forest fire, trying to extinguish it with your team = very fun!

Ohmygod *sob* *sob* I...I didn't even have a speech ready. Thank you so much *sob* This means so much to me *sob* *sob*

Well about as much fun as dropping bombs on buildings   Except you're saving lives instead of taking them... Maybe in OFP2 this would be cool (firefighting can be very dangerous and exciting) if the fire looks better in it. Now I'm not so sure if it would be fun. About saving lives instead of taking them, when's SWAT:UJ coming out?

It's all spoof.

Baron Hurlothrumbo IIX: I don't insult you like you insult me. I have nothing against the fact that you don't believe in God or Jesus. So why do you keep insulting me for the fact that I do? I only participated in this debate for the reason that you insulted christians. Just because I think that there could be a higher power, that there is more to this world than what we see, hear, smell, or feel doesn't make me less smarter than you are.

As you conveniently side step the main point of that quote, which was that jesus threatened to kill people, with a sword, if, say, a mother loved her child more than him. Â Not 'if she didn't love Jesus' - if she loved someone SLIGHTLY MORE THAN him. He didn't say he'd kill them with a sword. I don't really understand where you got that idea. Having a hard time understanding simple metaphores don't you? Ohhhh no he isnt. Â Your interpretation is wrong* Ask any priest or any religious person and he or she will tell you that in that verse Jesus talking about the future persecution against christians. In my bible Matthew 10:16-31 is labeled "Jesus encourages to bear the persecution" Now even you should get it. Which includes such nifty things as slitting open the stomachs of pregnant women, sacrificing your own children, rules governing and condoning slavery, laws stating that rape victims could be bought by the rapist for a pittance, laws banning women from [speaking in church, holding public official jobs, teaching etc], promising rewards for those who kill handicapped people (2 sam 5;8, in case you think I'm making that up) and a lot more things equally bad. Â The 'Will of God' you refer to was as inhuman as it was evil and barbaric. Â The Old Testament is full of disgusting, evil acts, which is why Xians normally make such a song and dance about how Jesus changed some of the rules. If christianity is such a cruel religion then why are we not living like that? He went round to every single house and showed them did he? Â Every single child lying in a crib, too young to walk, talk or understand anything, every single bed ridden cripple was shown? Â In the couple of days he was there?All those people were innocent and were killed for spite (in the story, as it didn't really happen) Again he didn't kill them. He cursed them, they will go to hell when the Doomsday comes. In my bible Matthew 11:20-24 is labeled "Jesus blames Galilean towns" Now even you should get it. This was simply an example of biblical cruelty. Â And it stands. So you think that evil should not be destroyed? If you have to be motivated by fear to be a moral person, there is something seriously wrong with you. Â Get help, please. I take that as an insult and wait for your apology. 'Jesus asks that his followers abandon their children to follow him.' That is child cruelty, plain and simple. Â Its evil and its disgusting. He says that everyone who abandons their house, brothers, or sisters, father, mother, or children or crops, will be rewarded. He doesn't say they have to. And its similarly wrong and evil. You were just trying to get more 'bad' quotes by quoting the same thing twice. In your opinion/ interpretation it is. Â In others it is not. Â I thought that this book was simple and easy to understand (your words.) Â You are contradicting yourself. (again) When I said 'simple and easy to understand' I didn't say that there wasn't any metaphores, but they are so simple that anyone understands them. Again Mark 4:21-25 is Labeled "Right hearing of the word" Now even you should get it. So you're saying that devils can tell jesus what to do now? I never said that Yes he did. Â Once again, you are ignoring the point and trying to divert attention with squabbling over ambiguous words. He said: "Let no one eat your fruit" Dunno what he was up to, but it doesn't sound like killing to me. He cursed it, doesn't always mean killing. Ahh the christian solution to everything: 'thats out of context'. Â I have read it. Â I think its completely in context. Â More examples of selective interpretation. He is obviously talking about his return on earth. Again go ask a priest what he thinks about it. no, I think I'll wait for you to answer these ones correctly first. Satisfied now? Of course not. I am not the only one with these interpretations. All christians would give you the same answers. Having this discussion with you is frustrating due to your narrow mindness, insulting attitude, and your lack of knowledge on the subject. You purposely leave out all the good that Jesus did, trying to defame christianity and christians.

At the time Jesus was alive. He was real and nothing stopped you from interacting with him. Today it's again matter of faith. In that verse Jesus is talking about the future persecution against the crhistians. He's teaching us to live by the will of God As I said before, if you say "I don't believe in God and Jesus it's bullshit" That's when you're going to hell. This time Jesus had shown them Gods power in their cities, but still they did not believe. You cannot justify any of the cruelties you mentioned in your previous post with that. It says in the bible that when the end of the world comes, Jesus will condemn us. Excactly what happens in Revelations 19:20-21. That does not give us the right to condemn those who do not believe in god. The idea behind these cruel punishments is fear. You are so frightened for the punishment that you obey the rules. Leaving your wife and children for Jesus is not a prerequisite for getting to heaven. Jesus does not say that you must do it. It's a test of faith, how far are you willing to go for God? This is the same incident than in Matthew 15:4-7 That is an out-of-content quote. Read Mark 4:21-25 Â I'll let you solve the metaphore yourself. Jesus didn't put the devils in the pigs. The devils prayed him to let them go in to the pigs. He didn't kill the tree. Great job with that totally out-of-content quote. Read Luke 12:35-48. Again I'll let you solve the metaphore yourself. Keep 'em coming.

That was in some newspaper in here couple of days ago. Can't you swedes treat war criminals correctly? They should send the bitch somewhere bad (not here, our prisons are tougher than swedish, but not tough enough)

Indeed, but people don't tend to go to war and commit other such nastiness, over their interpretation of the latest work by Damian Hurst. Â Maybe someone should try that...