Texx

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (bigpoppa @ Oct. 13 2002,23:52)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">That is, why I need command line support. And therefore I also requested the other file support like ext,cpp,hpp, because PROTON lacks SQS-syntaxhighlighting and I could not create a scheme for myself!<span id='postcolor'> Ok, I understand. I put it on my list, but it's a low priority point! Support for ext and cpp is already given! greetings, Texx

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (bigpoppa @ Oct. 13 2002,20)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Hi Texx, - customizable command line shortcuts. That means that I can define a command for the command line incorporating path/filename of the current file as argument. <span id='postcolor'> "customizable command line shortcuts": What do you want to do with this feature? Don't know why you need to execute a commandline-tool with an x/sqs file? Or do you only need the absolute filepath, maybe in clipboard!? </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (bigpoppa @ Oct. 13 2002,20)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"> Please take a look at Ulli Meybohms Page and test PROTON. Then you perhaps get some other ideas for your SQS-Editor. <span id='postcolor'> I know this tool. But i used "UltraEdit" as Refference! </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (bigpoppa @ Oct. 13 2002,20)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"> Nice work and keep on improving the editor! Â <!--emo&<span id='postcolor'> Thats my favour! greetings, Texx

Thank you for praising! I list your proposals. Maybe you will see them in a future version! @joltan: Interesting! Don't know why, but I think I can fix it! greetings, Texx

Nice to hear this from an "OF fan"-poster! I'll make the pagelines to be hide out in the optionmenu! greatings, Texx

@Rastavovich: You didn't bothering me, IMO it's better that you 'bothering' me cause of a possible bug, than the Software is elementary buggi! (That is, why i declared the current release a "Beta"! ) I never see a "elsif"-Statement befor, sorry. But can use "}else if{...}" instead. But, ATTENTION, this is not implementet yet. (It's a bug, not a feature ) I'll implement it now! greatings, Texx

@Rastavovich: Do you mean a "not"-like if-Statement? If it's so, just try to negativate the condition with a "!". Or did you mean "if(...){...}else{...}"? It's already implemented.  (I want to say: please explain it a liddle more! ) to you bugreport: I can't evaluate it. I tryed to do like you said, but in no case it crashes (or something like that). Can you explain it a liddle more? (and thanks for testing... ) @toadeater: Macros? Good idea! Maybe next version.... -to description.ext: I'll take a look at! -to ofpec.com: I've already looked at their side but I didn´'t found any link or email-address to contact them? Maybe someone can help me? greatings, Texx

@bn880: I don't worry! Thanks. Â @Rastavovich: Sure, that's an advantage of xSQS that it also works with 1.46/CWC. The commands you are asking for are the following: - if (with or without else) - for (with following syntax: for(<precondition>;<condition>;<postcondition>){ ... } - while It a Java/C/C++-Style. (If you have downloaded it, there is an file called 'sample.xsqs'. It contains all commands.) Surely that is not very much, but it is one more than 1.85 gives you (the 'for'-Statement, if i read the 1.85-Changelist correctly)! But as I already said, xSQS is still in development: for Example i want to add the possibility to use self defined function/procedures (with Namespaces to enable librarys). I didn't add this until now, becaus the stability of the current code was more important for me than a bigger list of feature. It will be intruduced in some comming Versions of xSQS-Edit. To the 1.85-'if'-Features: The Editor has FULL support for this. greatings, Texx

It's just because xSQS is a 1/2 jear older than 1.85. And at this time there was no "if/else", and so i decided to write a programm that can do so. An now I finished it, and give it to public. You can wait for 1.85 an maybe use what BIS gives you, but, xSQS is still in development too and in my head are some more ideas about features i want to add to sqs/sqs+. Also there are a lot of more Features that can be very usefull for you. E.g. CodeCompleation, integrated Help, an so on. Test it, and if you like it feel free to use it, but don't blame me, because of my (hard) work. (remenber xSQS started 1/2 jear ago) greatings, Texx PS: Also I must say, that i don't read changelist compleatly until now... I promise to do it now!

Hi, I have written a cool looking Editor for OFP-SQS-Scripts. Ok, you may think, what's the special, why should I use is programm instead of (e.g.) 'UltraEdit' or 'Notepad'. It's because of the limmitations of the original "sqs"-Language. The Programm supports some extension (called xsqs) that allows you to programm on an higher level than ever. To give you an imagin of what power xsqs gives you, see the example below: //in xsqs you can write things like this if(...){ /*do something you want*/ }else{ /*do something else*/ } which is equivalent with: ?(...): goto "if1" goto "else1" #if1 ;do something you want goto "endif1" #else1 ;do something else #endif1 But that is not all, there are a lot of other Features like "for" or "while". Finally xSQS-Edit gives you a modern Programming editor with codecompleation and contextsensitiv help of all possible sqs-commands. Everything to allow you to programm very fast and effectiv. An the best is: It is free. Free for non comercial use. (And free for comercial use if you ask me! Â ) Feel free an take a look at: http://www.contexx.net/xsqs/ greatings, Texx