Thehamster

Nice pic reminds me of my lunch.

Yep and I found him.

I'm this:

1--></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (nordin dk @ Mar. 02 2002,221)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Damage Inc @ Mar. 02 2002,22:50)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Don't you mean "spam you"? #Moderation mode Moved here<span id='postcolor'> No... #Moderation Mode Moved here!<span id='postcolor'> No #Moderation mode Moved here!

Why is this topic still open the spam is driving me mad....

God I hate Vodka the only reason I have a bottle of it is to use it as paint stripper or when I'm all out of whiskey or beer.

9% whoa I must be missing my x chromosomes.

LMAO.

Ahh the spam is driving me mad....

Smoking weed is all part of being student and so is drinking got to live up to are image of a bunch of drunks yep

1.Hospital across the road has been hit by U.S bomb

Yeha and he makes a crap curry.

The mods have got lazy and can't be assed to give reason any more.

Nope don't have this problem at all but it would be helpful to know what type of mouse you have.

He is most likely dead or living in Birmingham and is working in some Indian restaurant.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Our "job" is to see the forum running smoothly with as little crap as possible from people like you who do nothing but create friction and call people facists. If the mods left this forum it would quickly become posts containing flame, porn, random images, porn, flame, crap. <span id='postcolor'> Ha your over dramatize forums with no mods the old forums had very little flaming and practically no porn pictures in then well I never saw any porn pics. In fact we had rather a good system for control the great argument/flame power usually discouraged any body posting bad stuff a second time, which kept all the flaming down to the bare minimum only the right ass hole got any problems from us.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Akira @ Feb. 28 2002,21:56)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Thehamster @ Feb. 28 2002,22:21)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">All your missile shield will do if it does work we start a new arms race of a sort other countries will find it necessary to build more bigger bad ass missile that will get through it and you will spend even more upgrading your shield to stop them. A shield just is not practical every time they get a new missile through you will be defenceless against a nuclear strike until you got your new targeting system set up. You will be really buggard when they come up with a stealth nuclear missile you can not shoot down what you can not target.<span id='postcolor'> What other countries? European Union shouldn't have anything to fear, and as for "regional enemies" they already are trying to develop nuclear capability even before the shield was announced. China, North Korea and Iraq primarily is of whom I speak. Those countries already had, and will continue to have (shield or not), arms increases. China already has a nuclear missile capable of striking California, and had one even before the shield was thought up. The shield does not produce an arms race, the arms race is already here, and will be here for a long time. "Stealth ICBMs" and the like would have been developed (if possible....who knows...intriguing idea) anyway, if anything to combat warning times a target country has, the concept being the same as a stealth led first air-strike. Less knowledge of attack=less time to retaliate, and get defenses ready.<span id='postcolor'> The Russian are working on this new missile that will probably defeat your Star wars thing what it basically is a ICBM with a cruise missile for the final stage deliver process and it will be or so they say it will be very difficult for any missile system to spot it or kill it. Why does the US worry so much about nuclear weapons if I was your government I would be having a nervous break down over biological weapons they would cause far more damage than a nuke would there cheaper to make you don't need a missile to deliver them you just need a deodorant can or something and you can infect an entire city. What is the point of antagonising the Chinese are they a rouge nation as you call Iraq, N.K etc. Why do you have problems with China granted they are not the most enlighten country in the world but how are they threatening you?

Your right ohh well bye bye Euro flag

A vote for me is a vote for no spam

The absurd was a favorite theme of Basking Hailbut. Unfortunately, George Bush is absolutely half-baked in terms of Hailbut's usual Dadaist politics. In the following paragraphs, it will be proven that George Bush is the most reknown example of Symbolist writing ever created. This claim is buttressed by three points: (1) the Colonialist views of George Bush's protagonist, Master Joad, (2) Hailbut's triumphant role in the Symbolist movement, and (3) the author's brave use of incest depite the influence of the Symbolist school. First of all, in George Bush's first chapter we find Hailbut at his crassest. But even this section can still prove useful to the Italian reader. Consider: "Six of the men were expatriots; the others were feminists." (Hailbut 83) To conclude from this that my argument is true is... trivial. To indicate that Moby Dick is the work's villain, the author makes his dialogue simple. It is transparent that scholars--by seeing him as an avatar of Hailbut's conservative views--have misinterpreted the character Holden Stephenson's role in the book; Benvolio Lee is a surprisingly skillful character. Next, the subversive undertones motif in George Bush was not original with Hailbut. Consider this famous quote by Lewis Carroll: "His face was bright as he looked at her." George Bush's discordant amalgam of the absurd and coming of age couldn't be more forceful. Of course, like all great works, George Bush has its flaws! It is also obvious that scholars--by seeing him as an avatar of Hailbut's post reactionary views--have misinterpreted the character David Stephenson's role in the book. Finally, in the second chapter of George Bush, Hailbut writes: "Her eyes were blue like sapphires." (Hailbut 97) The pre Constructivist movement was in effect. It should be obvious that Hailbut was never driven purely by the immortality paradigm. Ichabod Sawyer's famously drug-influenced attitude throughout the book is often blamed; evidence for this conclusion abounds in the latter half of the book. The influence of Hailbut's George Bush is still strong. Perhaps it's time that scholars reevaluated their estimation of the book. Though contemporaries found Hailbut's use of farce witless, history will vindicate George Bush. This concludes my research.

My hamster for mod campaign office should be located in this thread.

Yep I would bring order to chaos around here or do I mean chaos to order naa Order to chaos is the one I want.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Damage Inc @ Feb. 28 2002,14:57)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Make spam out of him <span id='postcolor'> The lot of you can bite my furry ass. Any more reports of my death and things will soon start to heat up around here the spam machine that is me is only running on 1/10000000000000000000000 power at the moment but ohh when spring comes your ass will be sorry. PS. Damge you enjoying life in that spam tin?

Yeha I would ban you so quick for your racist remarks about hamster you would not know what had hit you. I'm starting my election campaign soon. End the spam make Thehamster a mod.

Don't you forget