

Seirrah
Member-
Content Count
7 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Medals
Everything posted by Seirrah
-
Is there a pc that can play ArmA at the top settings (medium AA and AF) at 1680x1050 at a comfortable frame rate (about 40fps say)? Can the top cpu and top graphics card manage that?
-
Just how do i get a higher FPS this is mad
Seirrah replied to Dudester's topic in ARMA - TROUBLESHOOTING
How do you force vsync off in the NVidia control panel? I really having been looking a lot! -
The performance issues are putting me, and loads of my friends, off from buying the game. Shame they don't seem to have got better, but I'm sure they tried hard.
-
What resolution(s) are these benchmarks done at? I have a P4 3.2Ghz and a 7800GS and I'm trying to work out what needs to improve to get a decent frame rate when at 1680x1050 (or a lower widescreen resolution). It's hard to find out whether I need a better CPU or a better graphics card. I've tried the demo and it just doesn't run very well
-
This may be a silly question then, but what would be the minmum spec required to play ArmA at full detail when at 1680x1050? Thanks
-
Surely my CPU (Pentium 4 3.2Ghz) is pretty weak by todays standards? I would normally just upgrade the gfx card, but I get the slight feeling that ArmA is quite CPU dependent.
-
Guys I hope you can help. I currently have : P4 3.2Ghz, 7800GS (AGP), 2GB Ram... I am running at 1680x1050 as my max resolution. My computer struggles with the demo quite a bit, even with fairly low settings. Being stuck on AGP at the moment I have the ability to upgrade my gfx card to a X1950, but I am wondering how much this would help. How dependent is ArmA on the gfx card and cpu? Bearing in mind I am using a 3.2Ghz P4. ie. Would a CPU upgrade be better than a gfx card upgrade in this instance? (How I would do that I do not know). All help is very much appreciated.