Shadak

Duuude I didnt believe at first but nHancer + 91.47 really changed the fps. Im using GX2 It was like 28 before... and now its around 50 (in a tested scene) Thanks guys :P

What has been changed ? personally I couldnt find a difference... Tried it just for couple of minutes though... the 100m or so distance is still there and when you aim from prone you still dont see shit Maybe the fps is better when prone and aiming i dunno...

http://mega-file.net/file.php?file=d3540cc755bad468f6a2ec8a9f52d11e And when you stay in the water for some time... the equipment drops from you and I couldnt pick it up again

If people were able to disable HDR wouldn't that give the player a massive advantage in MP games? One of the realism factors of ArmA is the consequence of setting up a ambush with the sun on your eyes, it makes it much more difficult for you to see your targets no? I also wonder if the AI has the visibility limitations if they are looking at targets with the sun in their face? Thanks for the quite honest review FCs. I tried to set postprocessing to low and some of the effects dissapeared. Not sure if its those HDR things though

Try using more satchels, I think you need at least 3 on the pillar. That's how it was of OFP: Resistance at least. Also try blowing up a city again now that I posted a correction (Pg 45 of this thread or Blanco's post on Pg 46) Thanks for the videos by the way. Well the init config is now working... but how do I trigger da bombs:) It doesnt go boom by itself

A Swimming vid http://mega-file.net/file.php?file=84925761b9a0604e266c4ab6ab2fc79f The bridge cant be blown up with satchels... I did it in a campaign mission though And about the splashes when something explodes under water - its there but it looks like a sprite or something

Here's a woods battle for now. The dense woods are a bit messy to make a vid though http://mega-file.net/file.php?file=485246f0c22c295987b28acaf9288960

this is what it says when I type anything in init field : Type Object, should be None

hey shadak video master!! I can´t resist your offering PLEASE can you make some armor ones... to finally see in action the heavy machine gun of the top of tanks (mainly T72) (but in first person view please) and also please show us some tank driving in turn out position... I always saw the tanks in third person view but never see them from the driver view... I mean in turn out position... please I would love see that!! Thanks!! Here is a little tank driving vid. http://mega-file.net/file.php?file=4c5865fddbf36844fb7c113982864809

Yeah, I love how you can notice the difference when they are shooting from farther away, the "sonic" effect, etc... Only the vehicle sounds seem to be pretty much the same. EDIT: btw I have some time today if anyone wants to see something particular. Maybe the armor fight but its not that interesting.

Sorry mate, bullets dont go through bodies. I tried different weps but they just dont Would be kool though

Almost every brighter light blinds you in those

Here you go, slippet through my gf's grasp to make a quick vid http://mega-file.net/file.php?file=7f1bb04aed1fac64f4dba664460aba1f

Here's how it looks when the vision comes back after switching NV off. - http://mega-file.net/file.php?file=0ed0183202e1fc42ee21649da58b8ccb

Considering the "cons" arguments at the end of the review... Im not troubled by "relatively low" marks. He basicaly says this - cons: * AI (i dont think its that bad) * Difficulity (you normally dont go shooting peeps in RL either - its supposed to be "realistic") * Massive HW requirements (no comment... testing on XP1600+ ?) * Nothing new comparing to OFP * Bad aircraft control (maybe too difficult for him? ) Sorry for flaming but i just dont like the reviewer's attitude.