Schattenlied

fine.... in this case, tell me why the tank itself is armed with a megasized cannon able to fire very heavy rounds against other tanks...and even with those super megasized guns its far from normal to fire right through a tank (modern tank) so, mr military expert...explain to me why there is a lack of anti-tank-tanks armed with 50 cal rifles...or even 50 cal miniguns so that they could be able to take out dozens of tanks in a matter of seconds...... and why at all they would bother to have these supersized heavy weapons on the tank at all.......to look scarier? dont worry about sources, ill take your word for it..... and why u say? because they would have to take too carful aim take more time and im pretty sure theyed rather just shoot the damn thing wherever they want. oh and the minigun thing wouldent work, niether would some kind of .50 cal chaingun, those things "throw" bullets. the bullets dont stay straight they tumble when fired from miniguns and chainguns, the m82a1 fires it straight allowing it to penetrate the armor, and not smack the side of it while spinning causing no damage.

k umm, ya i know what the Iraqis use that fires those rounds, BMP-2/ BMP-1. plain and simple,i think the BMP-1 uses 30mm tho, not sure

just so u know it dose work caus ive watched it happen . maby ur referring to the standard rounds used in .50 cal chainguns like the M.2. but those have like, 1/3 rd of the gunpowder in the shell as the shells used in the M82A1, and just so u know depleted uranium IS the strongest thing on the face of the earth., believe me ive seen it on the military channel, the history channel, and discovery channel, and the gun makers webstie. so close the book man, caus im right,

yes the m82A1 can put a round through any tank front to back, and i didnt learn this shit from websites alright, i didnt study this shit from websites, ive studyed the actual specs of basically everything that every military uses, from U.S miltary documents, not internet bullshit

can we possably get a demo date? if there is even gonna be one... release dates are comin up real fast and demos would be nice... especially caus theres still no publishers in US apperently to make a deal with... plz demo soon i dont wanna be stuck here sittin on my ass doin nothing while everyone in other countries are playing the game. ya know...

dude tow missles are actually really nice... those things will take out an abrams. but only the US and our allys have them so we dont really need to worry bout that now do we lol, anyways, i believe the BEST anti tank weapon is a properly trained sniper with an M82A1 .50Cal sniper rifle with depleated uranium ammunition. that thing CAN put a hole through an M1A1/A2 front to back. including through the engine. just figure out where the ammo is stored and put a round in it, witch the tank blow into pieces lol, and the US and our allys only have those too, so dont need to worry bout that either.

please be aware that i know alot more about the military than some people that are in it. i am one of the experts in this shit. . i have been studying the military, guns tanks and everything like that sence i was frekin 5 years old. i know shitloads of stuff on the subject so... ummm ya. and about the post above this one. id personally stick with a LAW. rpg type weapons are way too big. LAWs are plastic lol. they weigh almost nothing.

"the other Abrams knocked out this year in Iraq was hit by an RPG-7, a rocket-propelled grenade." ok ya sure and guess what. they replaced the treads and it kept on fighting.the other weapon, hmmm that could only be somthing stolen from american/british soldiers.i know of a weapon that fits that description exactally but i forget the name.

guess what... american crews arnt that stupid.

ok fine then, whatever, but if you REALLY wanna know what would happen in a real life situation? if you were targeting the abrams with an rpg?, ok you could shoot that M1A1/A2 abrams wherever the hell you wanted to with 10+ rpgs well all at the same time and guess what... it would turn around and blow the shit out of you. an M1 tank can take 15+ shots from a T-72 tank (wich has a 130MM main cannon) and it will most likley just need a quick fixup on the treads or somthing and be back in the fight within the hour.and it will most likeley deciamte the T-72 tank even after its been shot that many times... so theres really no way you can take out a M1 tank with an rpg. i know like, 20 people in the military that would tell you the same thing.

dude your special, i just read the thing 6 times, where the fuck dose it say to attack the abrams? and in what way dose the fact that a tank in the southern part of the pic mean its a southern armour target? do you know what a flanking manuver is? apperently not dumbass

Exactly. I marked the same spot. ok theres some slight problems with your area, you basically pointed this out yourself, you said behind the "ABRAMS" thats an AMERICAN TANK, not an enemy tank, pay attention guys, use your brain,.lol

dude thats right behind the american tank, youd be shooting a friendly with that rpg, not an enemy tank. read the post i put right before yours , if you look closly the enemy tanks are up at the top, driving north east,(T-72 tanks) wich would mean, enemy, there hard to spot at first but you will see them

ok just caus there in the northern part of town dosent mean there my tanks, and the tank in the south is an american M1A1/A2 abrams tank, nothing else. in otherwords, not a target

i have one thing to add, u guys were saying that even if u did disable the engine on a tank it could still kill you..., well your wrong, the engine powers the turret, no power no turn! tank is rendered compleatly useless my coordinates were 173,107, many tanks and i am on elevated ground behind them, turrets probly couldent angle that high to shoot me anyways lol and from behind i maximize use of my crapy rpg launcher, and the weekness of all tanks, the armor at the rear