Shrikey

if i recall right the Kilo-Mega-Giga system is based over latin. hence no change

http://www.aol.com

but his point about the Batteries is right thought. what is a trooper supposed to do if he suddenly runs out ?

umm. bitching over dates aint that a bit too far out ?

it is true that the rules must be followed. but enforceing em to the letter useally lead to pissed off users and personal flames. im doing full time moderating on 3 different medium sized boards belive me i know. generally i doubt that anybody whould disagree that a little useless drivel does not hurt but when it becomes a post race its time for the "lock Stick". but hell thats my opinion

why does that pic look distinticely canadian ?

hey its up around 4,9 now if i recall right more than twice as fast as my current

but uninstalling it whould be VERY bad. your disk performance whould scare crap out of even PIO 0 controllers. in addition you will likely have crashes and data curroption when you attempt to copy more than 100 megabyte of data.

well i agree with the BDRM.. its kinda funny/lame to be able to take a APC like unit out with precision machinegun fire... thought on the cockpit bulletproof cockpit... well skilled infantry ought to be able to hurt em someway or is it just me ?

i suppose its to sell more cd's thought i do see the point of everybody haveing a legal version of the game it is only hurting the MP mode by greatly complicating LAN play

i dont suppose you learned that in the army eh Gimbal ?

i think i will quote myself "wtf?"

obiusly one of those people who forgot that its humans in the other end. you just cant break in and make demands you know.

how annoyin. dont forget to get the entire line along http://homepage.ntlworld.com/sam.adham/US Marines.zip

we know. but i whould be surprised if there wasent some way to make a "sticky" surface

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">I'm not going to buy Creative soundcards anymore.<span id='postcolor'> i cal follow you on that. especially since the playcenter that came with the European version of the card whould kill sound off a 2k machine totally. heck it was Beta software as far as i recall. ive had nothing but issues with mine. missing effects... jitters.. EAX related crashes and the lis goes on and on

how much are we talking performance wise ? 10% ? 20% ? and is the value constant ?

yup. i played Wolfenstein back when it came out and when you compare the two

due to the gheyness of tripod you need to take the URL and copy paste... what is that ? mobile Artillery ?

seen it too in a mission im playing around with... i stole a empty BMP-2 for my squad and then a A-10 blows me away.. i was resistance but NATO was supposeingly set to friendly..

heh.. its even worse with AR's i mean the G3 series is called M/69 and M/75 around here while the army also use a M16/M4 (cant remember) that is designated the M/99 and dont start a big denmark vs. sweden fight without me ! we can always beat you in football anyway =P

err... i managed to get my entire squad killed on the way to that darn house and sneak all the way to the alternate evac zone took a good hour but god i love those missions

World War II mostly acturally... the P-51 is much much slimmer and more square to look at also the A-1(in that pic) dont got a underslung air intake

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (advocatexxx @ Mar. 24 2002,14:06)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">C-130 is pointless. Why would you want it to transport cars ? Â You can't land anywhere but one airport on each island ! Â Get a grip. Only possible use I can find is paratrooper operations. Â C-130 holds about 64 Paratroopers, while Chinook can hold 24. Â Keep in mind that if battle was ranged on small islands such as the ones in this game, C-130s would never be used to take off from a runway on an island which is only about 12 kilometers long. Â Are you kidding me ? I'd rather prefer to see units that actually make sense, and have a logical use in the game, not just some stupid airplanes because a 14-year old thinks they'd be COOL to fly overhead. Â Give me a break. And whoever said the Chinooks are an easy target as opposed to the C-130 is on crack. Â Not only is the C-130 much bigger, but if it's shot down, all troops are lost. Â If you have 3 Chinooks carrying the same amount of troops as the C-130, then even if one Chinook gets shot down the other two will still deploy their soldiers. The flight physics are way too unrealistic as they are, no need for more planes is needed, especially if they have no use, are completely unrealistic in this type of battle, and should only be included because someone thinks they're SOOO COOOL. This game is best at simulating Infantry. Â It's not a flightsim ! Â Go pick up a copy of some arcade style air battle game, but don't try and clutter this great game with stupid things. Â I say add more Infantry units, expand their capabilities, etc.<span id='postcolor'> err.. what rules out the posserbilerty of useing em to ferry troops and equipment in ? or for that sake when a Chinook is a piss poor alternate ? also on another note... C-130's are known to be able under certain contitions to take off from strips about 750 meters long

like the "new" MLRS systems the danish army just recived . are anybody working on those things anyway ?