Sgt Hammer

I have a face pack, but I'd like to be able to extract one of the faces in to a jpg format so that I can change the color of the eyes... is this possible?

How about a M14? since it is 10x better than the FAL and G3.

You asses have the attention spans of handicapped 3 year olds.

Hey folks, I searched all tutorials and stuff and I did not find what I was looking for, so here is what I need. I have a mission that requires me to nail some shilkas so that two Apaches can come and blow the #### out of a town.. I have trigger that plays music when the shilkas are blown, but I would like to know how I can get that to signal my apaches to attack (like to activate a seek and destroy waypoint) any help will be appreciated.

When he makes a good addon, please inform me.

Thanks Red! one more question Lets say I want a team of bradleys to unload soldiers into the city after I kill everybody,.. how would I do that? I tried the wp1=1 and wp1==1 thing but they just head towards the city right away without waiting

yes, u have to send 15$ just check the back of your manuel to get the address

Ahh thank you Erex, and your english is not that bad.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Don't release any tools to the public yet! Image how much immature and newbie stuff would come. Only give this to the pros! <span id='postcolor'> well you are certainly out of that catagory

Thanks for that wonderful contribution to the conversation Mr. Stipek

Sgt. Hammer - 1 Aculaud - 0

Sgt. Hammer - 1 Aculaud - 0

I am not twisting your words, I am going on what you typed. in the future I suggest you word your sentences better.

I am not twisting your words, I am going on what you typed. in the future I suggest you word your sentences better.

Yes accuracy is the princple around battle rifles

Yes accuracy is the princple around battle rifles

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">weapons werent meant for accuracy, although they got the job done perfectly well<span id='postcolor'> Which is wrong, the Garand and M14 were ment for accuracy.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">weapons werent meant for accuracy, although they got the job done perfectly well<span id='postcolor'> Which is wrong, the Garand and M14 were ment for accuracy.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Yeah, says you. If you know so much about history, and the like, you must know that there can be more than one side to it. its called having a different perspective. So tell me, i'm dying to know. what have i stated thats so wrong?<span id='postcolor'> Where stated the Garand was not an accurate weapon

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Yeah, says you. If you know so much about history, and the like, you must know that there can be more than one side to it. its called having a different perspective. So tell me, i'm dying to know. what have i stated thats so wrong?<span id='postcolor'> Where stated the Garand was not an accurate weapon

I *will* give you s**t, I am pointing out that because they were given bipods THAT DOESNT MEAN THEY WERE DESIGNED FOR THE SUPPORT ROLL s**t BIRD. I have M1As (basically M14s) and know the history of the M14. The BAR was replaced with the M60 machine gun, not M14... The m14 was tested in support rolls but was heavily modified, some even had belts. My beef is that you go shooting your mouth off and you don't even have the slightest idea what you are talking about.

I *will* give you s**t, I am pointing out that because they were given bipods THAT DOESNT MEAN THEY WERE DESIGNED FOR THE SUPPORT ROLL s**t BIRD. I have M1As (basically M14s) and know the history of the M14. The BAR was replaced with the M60 machine gun, not M14... The m14 was tested in support rolls but was heavily modified, some even had belts. My beef is that you go shooting your mouth off and you don't even have the slightest idea what you are talking about.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">the M-14 was made with both semi and gas operation. it was origionally designed for semi-auto fire, but some of them were equiped with bipods to be used as squad automatic weapons.<span id='postcolor'> No s**t, BUT THAT WAS NOT THEIR MAIN ROLE.. did you think the US Army planned on using the Garand the entire time and than going to use the M14 as a support weapon? NO!!!! The bipod was added to the M14 for the same reason the bipod was added to the M1 Garand, for added accuracy while prone.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">the M-14 was made with both semi and gas operation. it was origionally designed for semi-auto fire, but some of them were equiped with bipods to be used as squad automatic weapons.<span id='postcolor'> No s**t, BUT THAT WAS NOT THEIR MAIN ROLE.. did you think the US Army planned on using the Garand the entire time and than going to use the M14 as a support weapon? NO!!!! The bipod was added to the M14 for the same reason the bipod was added to the M1 Garand, for added accuracy while prone.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Browning Automatic Rifle, and the M-1 Garand. both of those weapons werent meant for accuracy, although they got the job done perfectly well. I think this si a good oppertunity to add a sniper rifle that was actually meant to be a sniper rifle. <span id='postcolor'> Before making a post how about you do a little research dumbass. The M14 was made to replace the M1 Garand, The M14 came to be after many years of development and controversy. One world class weapon that competed against the M14 for U.S. adoption, and lost, was the FN FAL. The reasons for the military choosing the M14 over the FN FAL were, due to the similarities of the M1 Garand and the new M14, training and manufacture would be easier. The M14 was a pound lighter than the FAL, and the United States was not about to adopt a foreign weapon for the U.S. military. Ironically the FN Corporation would eventually produce the M16A2 for the U.S., and the armed services would eventually replace their 1911A1s with the Italian-designed M9 Beretta. The M14 is basically a product-improved M1 Garand. The M14 cured the short comings of the 1930's-developed Garand. Briefly, these improvements were a detachable 20-round capacity magazine, a floating gas piston, the gas port on the barrel located closer to the receiver, a roller on the bolt to reduce friction, full-auto capability, a flash suppresser, chrome lined barrel, and a "smaller" round: the 7.62 NATO or as civilians were to know it, the .308. The reason the M14 is better than the FN FAL are due to a few problems, the first being that the FAL has gas system problems, and gas adjuster knob trouble, it is not as reliable as the M14.. not by a long shot. The second is that the FAL is slightly heavier than the M14, and the third is that it has horrible sights which can't be adjusted to windage & elevation. The reason for the M14 being better than the G3 are that it too is slightly heavier, (the M14 has a longer sight radius and better trigger pull than the G3 and FAL) it has horrible ergonomics, it is front heavy & unbalanced, it also have Heavier recoil. The magazines / feeding mechanisms isn't as reliable as the M14's, seeing as how the M14 GI magazines are known throughout the gun world as the best, plus the G3 sights are just as bad of the FAL's. Now lets compare the FN to the G3… The FN is easier to maintain in the field than the G3, With The H&K G3 you have to remove the buttstock by pulling 2 pins at the rear of the receiver these can be lost under the rigors of combat. Also with the H&K's roller lock it is fairly easy to get the rollers locked out when cleaning Making it impossible to reinstall without complete disassembly and reassemble of the bolt to reinstall. Which could be a royal pain to do the first couple of times. So although the M14 tops them both ...... the FN FAL is better than the G3 Lets compare weight now... The M14 weighs 9.2 pounds empty, the FAL weighs 9.4 pounds empty, and the G3 weighs 9.7 pounds empty. As you can see the M14 is lighter than both of them (information on rifle weights comes form U.S Army M14 Guide book, FN's webpage, H&K's webpage) When it comes to Accuracy all three rifles run neck and neck ....... its the slight advantages listed above that make the M14 the best followed by the FN FAL and then finally the G3A3 ... at least in my opinion (and every other knowledgeable "gun nut"). So next time do some d*amn research, I garentee you most of those old weapons are x10 better than todays plastic fantast garbage.