Przezdzieblo

Wello, so cooperation would be easier becouse of earlier contacts with LWP Mod Airwolf, if I remember, is not member of that mod team, but still makes chopper for them.

[CCCP] Stalker, I agree with that inacuracy, but only imperialistic artillery MSTA and KRAB (coming soon) zap all their target right between the eyes...

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">A T-72 is a Simplified version of a T-64. A T-64 has different suspension system,and it can fire a At-8 Kobra missle. I believe it also uses a different engine that was notorius for unreliability and a "shaking" problem. <span id='postcolor'> Well, really T64 and T72 had only similar turrets and some parts of propulsion system. But even T72 turrets was modified comparing with those of T64. Tank were different constructions. T72 evolued from marriage of T62 and T64 weapon system idea and later became T90. T64 still lives in T80`s skin. Oh, and all of those, plus late versions of T55, are still in service in Russia. I think there is need of new tank models. Those from BIS (great guys, however) have some bugs, bad proportions etc. Tank models like those by Sigma are really nice and could be a base for another modifications (after author rights` talks ). I wish I could see PT-91 Twardy, Polish modification of T72, with one of the best world`s reactive armor. I am waiting for new T55. Nice to see Iraqis tank with some applique armor or those with 125 mm gun...

Polish, guys, if those addons are hawk`s, it is Polish.

Lol... Computers are still stupid Åadowanie amunicji - "rearming" Brak amunicji - yep, "lack of ammo" Strzelam do celu - "I fire at target" Wstrzymujemy ostrza - well, litterally it means "we are stoping blades". Are there any blades on this addon? Learn Polish P.S. ALT+SHIFT nie zostaÅ‚ naciÅ›niÄ™ty- "you didn`t use ALT+SHIFT" (if I remember action of Hawks addons ALT+SHIFT is needed for aiming) WspółrzÄ™dne celu ustawione - "target cordinates arranged" Preferowana amunicja to - "prefered ammo is" Maksymalny zasiÄ™g amunicji - "ammo maximum range" Cel poza zasiÄ™giem - "target out of range" Trwa celowanie - "aiming", "still proceeding with aiming" P.P.S. Gotowy do otwarcia ognia - "ready to fire"

Paste it here, someone would help, I think...

Eviscerator, but real perfection is made only with perfect parts. Rules are simple. When we see one nice addon we not always think about this what could be better. But there is new addon, with improved quality and better reality model config, we must compare. For example I love HK Pack (The Lost Brothers Mod, are they still with us) although I think MG3 from DKM MoD is better and G11 could be more acurate. This is disadvantage of multiaddons, but still there could be upgraded (like The Lost Brothers Mod showed). BAS addons are high quality so it is normal that players want to have it as good as possible. And after releasing news about new M24 we see there is possibility to make M24 even better than it is now. Eviscerator, I know that maker od M24 from BAS took plenty of time into his work, but maybe there is a way to join forces? Players want high quality addons, comparing addons and challenging mod teams still improve standards (for example maybe Airwolfs Mi2 is so good becouse of model of his rivals from Russia ). Please think about some upgrade BAS addon deserve for it. Thanks to independent modellers for forcing mod teams for intensive work

Well, I think that comparing one of the best soldier/weapons addon with incoming new M24 is natural. Without some rivalry addons would be so good as they are (hm, maybe some of them). And one more- comparing of both weapons could has some influence on addonmakers and force them to publish new, better versions of their work. Eviscerator, do you think that all parts of addon would be as good as possible, or do you think that all parts make addon and precision in modeling or configuration of it is not so important when there are many new weapons/soldiers?

If I remember Bradleys are amphibious but after some preparations. There is imposible to cross deep water obstacle without those actions. ERA may be dangerous for infrantry and RPG explosion on vehicle side too. New versions of Bradleys with reactive armour could resist more hits than older. But still RPG is big threat, when hit plates not protected with ERA, top od vehicle or even front at some degree (possibility of engine destroyed and fire) What a pity that OF engine still do not support realistic damage system. But I think there is some way to deal with this lack. Maybe when projectile smash new Bradley, hitted part would be out of action. One RPG could turn Bradley out of action (track, engine, armament malfunction), hurt crewmembers but without vehicle explosion.

AKM74, it is obvious why these data we have are only producers informations. From the other hand I know that Izmash sometimes give some news which are really absurdal. But if you want to believe, that at 300-400 meters there is any comparison with AK or M16- your choice, we know only what producers` propaganda said. Really: short, dull- edged, stabilisated by rotation slow bullet cannot be accurate at that range. Is VSS` PSO-1 other type of PSO-1? This kind of sight has characteristic body with connecting rail on the left side. Why your model has another?

AKM74, it is obvious why these data we have are only producers informations. From the other hand I know that Izmash sometimes give some news which are really absurdal. But if you want to believe, that at 300-400 meters there is any comparison with AK or M16- your choice, we know only what producers` propaganda said. Really: short, dull- edged, stabilisated by rotation slow bullet cannot be accurate at that range. Is VSS` PSO-1 other type of PSO-1? This kind of sight has characteristic body with connecting rail on the left side. Why your model has another?

If I know VSS has PSO-1 optics, the same as has SVD. There is no need to make new reticle, only please remember about x4 magnification, not x8 (like sight of SVD in OF has). The power of new Russian bullets is still a secret. No one knows the results of fire these bullets. But this, what we know from producers, is rather mistification. Slow but heavy bullet maybe has good penetration ratio, fired from 200-300 meters has still power to kill or make "target" out of concious, but its accuracy cannot be good. So dispertion at 300 meters would be much more bigger than 5.45-5.56 bullets. Please, do not make VSS next Wunderwaffe. It is just stronger submaschine gun, less effective than M16 or AK, it is rather not revolutionary as P90 and new 4.7 mm HK weapon are.

If I know VSS has PSO-1 optics, the same as has SVD. There is no need to make new reticle, only please remember about x4 magnification, not x8 (like sight of SVD in OF has). The power of new Russian bullets is still a secret. No one knows the results of fire these bullets. But this, what we know from producers, is rather mistification. Slow but heavy bullet maybe has good penetration ratio, fired from 200-300 meters has still power to kill or make "target" out of concious, but its accuracy cannot be good. So dispertion at 300 meters would be much more bigger than 5.45-5.56 bullets. Please, do not make VSS next Wunderwaffe. It is just stronger submaschine gun, less effective than M16 or AK, it is rather not revolutionary as P90 and new 4.7 mm HK weapon are.

Chobham or Burlington Challenger 1 and M1 have first generation Chobham armour, newest Leopards II A5-6 have second generation improved Chobham protection. Rifled guns have a big disadvantage- for shooting with most accurate and effective APFSDS projectiles there is need for using complicated sabots. Rifled barrels also has much shorter life than those with smooth barrels. More- effectiveness of HEAT projectiles fired from rifled gun is less. Maybe this is the reason for using HESH in British Army. Please remember, that all modern tank projectiles have great efficiency even at 2000 meters, in OFP tanks are figthting at closer ranges. Newest German bullet, DM53, can penetrate 700 homogenious steel plate at 2000 meters, think about what it may destroy from 500 meters. All modern Russian tanks have automatic loaders. It`s disadvantage is rather short penetrator, so it`s efficiency is less than Western ammunitions` with very long volfram or DU cores. So I think in T90 vs Challenger1 tank clash the winner would be the British one. Better protected, better armed.

Well, all here is in English, I am not native speaker of this language, so I may not understand all but... there is one optic sight, well known optics sight, PSO-1 from SVD. It`s reticle is also well known, it has horizontal scale (mils?), it has four aiming points looking like V upside down, it has primitive but usefull rangefinder. Only "bug" in OFP- it has x8 magnification, although it would has x4. Is it any possibility to make it real sight? First easy convert it for x4. Then make simulation for using two aiming drums, knobs of deflection correction and of sight angles. So when we would find our target we start eliminating with finding range. Then proceeding with aiming, using two knobs` scripts (one if target is not moving). Information about SVDs` PSO-1: http://www.gunmanuals.ch/manuals01.htm

Airwolf, keep working, great work. And free Mi2

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"> Heh, SA80's with iron sights.... Only the Cadet forces in the UK use SA80's with iron sights these days, if it hasn't got a SUSAT its got a night vision scope... <span id='postcolor'> </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">I saw a picture the other week of a Royal Navy rating on guard duty, the SA80 was fitted with iron sights. So there is at least some need for it.<span id='postcolor'> And I saw SA80 with transport grip and iron sights few years ago in HMS "Battleaxe". So I think this version of rifle is used by Royal Navy (Marines too?). From the other hand I read somewhere about some pioneers and engineers troops and artilery crews equiped with no-SUSAT SA80.

Airwolf, I never said you are the leader, I only mentioned you are Mi2 modeler. From the other hand your presence on LWP Mod forum indicates you are in this Mod (well, even LWPTEAM group moderator). But nevermind, good you were here yesterday and could say about your model by your own lips/fingers. Becouse of your usual absence on our Polish OFP "cell" may I ask you is Mi2 your only "baby"? I know about this funny battle heli Airwolf, but when I see many hawk`s ideas and models I am curious do you have something more than mentioned machines? And from else-where I know these Mi2 fotos are not first-fresh, any other pics?

Thanks for new link, my has error. LWP Mod has site, but also has forum. And they are still alive, it is not spectacular life, but life.

LWP Mod had some problems about two months ago, now it is reactivated with the new leader Airwolf, Mi2 modeler, said he would release his "baby" in unarmed version before Mod will be done. So now I think you should stay patient in queue, addon would be published when ready. I do not know why LWP Mod site is off, maybe they current gone and dynamos off

Gimme gimme gimme Each individual ERA brick is textured? But Sigma-6 please, eat and drink something sometimes, better good modeler alive and model little worse, than one good model with modeler corp on it... Gimme gimme gimme... improved internal too

Oh. Yep? Oh. Really. Nothing to say... Maybe someone make BMP3 to make my previous post not OT...

Why this really pretty model has only 30 mm automatic gun? BMP3 has, as I remember, coaxed 100 mm semi-automatic gun, from which can also fire missiles. Is it only demonstrator of author skill or model of future addon? If so it will be underpowered...

Updated version of hawk`s 2S19 here. New wheels, tracks moves in right direction, new machine gun. More info in Polish in archivum on http://www.of.fpp.pl/ image here : http://www.of.fpp.pl/images/pics/news/2s19new.jpg P.S. If direct link does not work try to find manually, side as above, search in "archiwum", if does not work still, wait for update of update

Ok, ok, I shall change nothing in those files, I put my endless trust in you, just make models I could get in and try A only thought it is little boring to hear always "oh, you are so great, so fantastic, oh god, oh, oh, please, don`t stop" etc. I am waiting for ImProved versions of your addons, final, even ultimate and as good as no addon ever was. Maybe some new internal views? Ok, I stop, not a word, customer is not always right (except he paid, I never paid you and possibly never shall ). Keep working and inform community about progress P.S. Sounds good, "if you want something from us, Canadian, go to Germans" If I want Leopard II in Polish colours who may I call?