Paratrooper

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Col. Kurtz @ Sep. 10 2002,14:38)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Lets be innovative, lets throw out all this invasion crap. If all the Iraqi people hate him and yearn for his downful like you all seem to believe, then it is easy. We send in the British SAS, drop right on top of his palice and kill him. As soon as we have killed him, every single Iraqi will throw down their arms and imbrace all western countires and will sell oil to American companies at very low prices Whoops! I wouldnt be this easy, we damn....... You see, they love him enough that they will shoot you if you try and kill him. Maybe once he was dead they would stop loving him, but you have to kill him first. Once you start bombing, he just has to go and hide in a bunker. I want him dead, but I DO NOT want a typical American 'lets blow up everything that moves' strategy. This is not Anti-Americanism, I do not respect any country who suses this tactic. I do not think that we should have to see a low list of dead on both side, wither they be soldier or civilian. Im sure the Pentagon will be happy to redesign their strategy and send off the Kurds to do their bidding as with the Northen Alliance in Afghanistan.<span id='postcolor'> That is reasonable, but do you deny he is dangerous? Do you think he should be left unchecked?

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (WhoCares @ Sep. 10 2002,14:30)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Paratrooper @ Sep. 10 2002,13:57)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">The point is, if he had nuclear boms it would be too late, they would be in the hands of a man calling for revenge against American lives:revenge He could give them to anyone. The thing we did learn from september 11th is that terrorism is powerful.<span id='postcolor'> Why should he wait to have nukes? If giving away WMDs would be in his serious interrest, why didn't he give chemical weapons to terrorists???<span id='postcolor'> We don't know that he hasn't. Or what he has as he has expelled the UN arms inspectors, either they go back in with the full support of the UN or action will have to be taken. We can't have a dangerous country acting as a weapons factory unchecked. Saddam hates America, Israel and we can assume Britain, remind you of anyone? And we know what he is capable of.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (theavonlady @ Sep. 10 2002,14:23)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">0--></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (CosmicCastaway @ Sep. 10 2002,150)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Have a look here: http://www.salon.com/politics/comics/2002/08/08/corrections/index.html He's actually done quite a few satirical takes on world politics, but this particular one seems relevant to the current conversation. Â <span id='postcolor'> Cute. Now let's be realistic. Saddam is a horribly cruel and sadistic dictator who has shown that he's willing to attack other countries unprovoked with long range missiles and with poison (Kurds and Iranians).<span id='postcolor'> Also that he has no qualms supporting terrorist groups like Hamas. Terrorism is how the nuclear weapons will be used when they are developed. Why jepodise the safety of the world?

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (WhoCares @ Sep. 10 2002,13:43)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (theavonlady @ Sep. 10 2002,13:24)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Col. Kurtz @ Sep. 10 2002,14<!--emo&)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">If the US could come up with a good enough reason, I would have no problem with Hussien been taken down.<span id='postcolor'> Food for thought.<span id='postcolor'> As long as they can't get rid of all the 'could, would, seems to, problably, if, eventually, ...' - I think, I have never seen a more wage article of propaganda then this!<span id='postcolor'> The point is, if he had nuclear boms it would be too late, they would be in the hands of a man calling for revenge against American lives:revenge He could give them to anyone. The thing we did learn from september 11th is that terrorism is powerful.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Red Oct @ Sep. 10 2002,10:26)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Antichrist @ Sep. 09 2002,02:22)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Die Alive @ Sep. 09 2002,01:20)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Antichrist @ Sep. 08 2002,18:33)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">1. How do u suggest we implement FIRECONTROLLER? It is still impossible. OFP engine does not support any of that stuff.<span id='postcolor'> Well, make it like the gunners in the Cobra or Apache, u know, he just sits there, selecting targets, and shoots. Â On the boat, the guy could be on the bridge of the ship and locking on targets he could see (in the radar at the top of the screen), and launches SAMs or guns. -=Die Alive=-<span id='postcolor'> First of all we can't make SAMs or any missiles for that matter on the ship, class="ship" doesn't support them. Just like class="car". And you cannot fire more than one weapon at the time. So unless BIS release some kind of patch the only working weapon gonna be AK-306 cannon. Â <span id='postcolor'> wait a sec, suppose instead of making the programing based on a boat/ship class, you made it based a armor class, a amphibious vechicle like the BMP. armor is capable of having surface to air missles so would that work?<span id='postcolor'> But it wouldn't behave like a boat surely.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Chill @ Sep. 10 2002,11:35)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">I think the future Kurtz is as it is now. It will always be a very volitile region. There will be no resolve in the mid east not until armegedon.<span id='postcolor'> There has to be a way to find peace. I still think the whole West bank and Gaza should become the responsibility of the UN. With Israeli provocation removed there will be less 'revenge' attacks. A real partition and rebuilding of the shattered area can only help the cause of peace. Israel carrying out a 'war' is never going to.

That is basically a British army jumper. This is my lot: UOTC

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Duke_of_Ray @ Sep. 10 2002,01:21)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">So are not all are threads redundant? I mean we either say Israel is right or wrong, I sya their right you say their wrong, so it seems. <span id='postcolor'> Don't you read the posts? Do you just want a contradiction session? The rest of us are managing to have a debate.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (bn880 @ Sep. 10 2002,01:00)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">OKay this is SPAM. Â duke, say something new, or factual, or stop bothering the discussion.<span id='postcolor'> He means he has been prohibited from spouting religious dogma, which he considers supports his opinion.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Tex [uSMC] @ Sep. 10 2002,00:04)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (billytran @ Sep. 09 2002,23:53)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Fox News, they're the only non-liberal news channel.<span id='postcolor'> what a stupid remark. Lets try this one. Fox News Channel is a tool of the GOP, that grubs for ratings by pandering directly to the conservative party line, while at the same time claiming that they are an unbiased news source. I turned it on last night, and they were STILL bitching about Clinton! I mean COME ON! Its been almost 3 years since he left, and you fuckin republicans just cant let it go, can you?<span id='postcolor'> Recieving Fox news via satalite was quite an awakening for me! It explains alot.

BBC Radio 4 news and the today program. The Independant and the Daily Telegraph newspapers. BBC 2 Newsnight.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (bogo @ Sep. 09 2002,23:07)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Duke_of_Ray @ Sep. 09 2002,23:46)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Actually its the other way around and then the other way around. <span id='postcolor'> And you facts are based on ??<span id='postcolor'> There you go using the 'F' word again!

Why are the new German units on the resistance side? I can't use them against the plethora of resistance/terrorists I have!

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Duke_of_Ray @ Sep. 09 2002,22:56)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">I thought there was a large air raid on Iraq a few weeks ago.<span id='postcolor'> That was part of the no-fly zone enforcement, not war.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Duke_of_Ray @ Sep. 09 2002,22:38)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">If I moved into your house would you not want to kick me out? Well thats what Palestine has done to Israel, its Israel's house. Â <span id='postcolor'> That could not be more ironic.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Die Alive @ Sep. 09 2002,21:45)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">I think he had the right to speak, but that right was refused by a small group of demonstrators/assholes. Â Funny, these guys don't let a Jew the chance to speak, but when cops use pepper spray or kick the shit out of them, they're the first ones complaining that they're being singled out and attacked because they're arabs. Â F them. -=Die Alive=-<span id='postcolor'> Yes, racism is always something someone else commits in the eyes of these people.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Albert Schweizer @ Sep. 09 2002,20:24)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Yeah, it is gonna be cool. We gonna get new films and stuff. Maybe even a new version of Americas Army where you got to bomb roads and cities and stuff. Fucking hell and we gonna see all those new US weapons and maybe even pictures of american soldiers in an mustard-gas attack. Like in "Total Recall" they will try to get air and their eyes will pop out and then they all explode and spit blood and stuff. So fucking cool. And maybe we can all join like in Starship Troopers. I was pretty good at playing Americas Army, I think they would make a sniper immediately with the score I reached in that game. And once Saddam is pissed of he will throw nukes at Isreal and they will throw theirs back and then we gonna see from satelites how the entire Middle East is like gleaming at night and stuff. So fucking awesome<span id='postcolor'> I think you made your point.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (theavonlady @ Sep. 09 2002,13:49)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Paratrooper @ Sep. 09 2002,14:45)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (theavonlady @ Sep. 09 2002,13:41)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Albert Schweizer @ Sep. 09 2002,14:12)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Any proof of Saddam harbouring terorists?<span id='postcolor'> Just passing through. <span id='postcolor'> True, the links the Palestinian terrorism are clear, the leap the the US is not massive now is it? Plus America is not the only country threatened, what about Israel? Just because their Palestinian strategy isn't very fashionable doesn't mean they don't have to be protected.<span id='postcolor'> And Turkey and Kuwait and still possibly Saudi Arabia and Iran? Hey! They're worried next door in Jordan!<span id='postcolor'> Very true.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (theavonlady @ Sep. 09 2002,13:41)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Albert Schweizer @ Sep. 09 2002,14:12)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Any proof of Saddam harbouring terorists?<span id='postcolor'> Just passing through. <span id='postcolor'> True, the links the Palestinian terrorism are clear, the leap the the US is not massive now is it? Plus America is not the only country threatened, what about Israel? Just because their Palestinian strategy isn't very fashionable doesn't mean they don't have to be protected.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Tex [uSMC] @ Sep. 09 2002,13:09)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Angelfire doesnt let you do that Paratrooper.<span id='postcolor'> Sorry, I can see it I asumed you could. They look good though don't they?

Bibmi is working on some realistic American units. His British army stuff was great but he is remaking them with the propper tools so they will never be released.

I have actually done this everyday, are you all remembering?

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Bernadotte @ Sep. 09 2002,11:01)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Col. Kurtz @ Sep. 09 2002,04:10)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Palestinia was wrong forst...<span id='postcolor'> I realise it's difficult to imagine an on-going conflict having it's roots in political decisions made 85 years ago, but that's what we've got here. Â Britain had no right to make those decisions (Balfour Declaration) about a foreign land, especially when they directly contradicted earlier decisions (Sykes-Picot Agreement) about liberating Palestine from Ottoman rule. So actually, Britain was wrong first. But lucky for them, they stepped out of the picture in 1948. Â In fact, the British warned the US about enormous troubles that would be caused if they supported efforts to declare the state of Israel on the land of the Palestinians. Â President Truman responded to the warning by saying: </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">I am sorry gentlemen, but I have to answer to hundreds of thousands of who are anxious for the success of Zionism. I do not have hundreds of thousands of Arabs among my constituents. Â -- Harry S. Truman<span id='postcolor'><span id='postcolor'> About the fault of Britain: The British Empire was colapsing courtesy of Herr Hitler, another piece of his handy work was the Holocaust. The world felt for the Jewish Nation then, everybody wanted to give them a state in the middle-east. Britain tried to slowly set up the partition state but came under attack by Jew and Arab alike. With dwindling men and resources for the rest of the Empire propper a quick soloution was come to and Britain was forced out by the Israelis. Not really our fault, but the terrible circumstances of the time, not much has changed either!

They are hired mercenarys, it is mentioned in the film, no need to guess.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (SirLoins @ Sep. 09 2002,02:38)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"> Posted: Sep. 09 2002,01:15 Â Â -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Quote (SirLoins @ Sep. 09 2002,019) And let's hope that not too many share yours. What a twisted mentallity. How do your view your things? From someone elses perspective? Â It seems to me that Duke is using his own perspective just like me. Â How nice and refreshing. Ah..the wonderful american right win head in the sand isolationist mentality. Anyone who doesnt think the way you do is 'twisted' It is not the place of every other culture and society in the world to make themselves agreeable to you. Â It's a big world and there is nothing at all wrong with people believing in different things and living their lives in different ways. Â If you truly believe that it was just jealousy and hatred of 'the american way of life' that caused the 9/11 attacks, then I feel very sorry for you. Here is a hint: The root of why people dislike America actually has very little to do with the American way of life or American freedoms.<span id='postcolor'> Warrin, you should use your own standards when saying that anyone who doesn't think the way I do is twisted. Apparantly, I am twisted because I don't agree with the majority of left wingers on this site. Â So be it. Would the Europeans rather the US take our guns and go home? Â We could lock our borders and take care of ourselves and say screw the rest of the world. Â Who will you call the next time Saddam invades or uses WMD? Â The UN? Â That will be the day, as the UN is nothing militarily without the US. All you guys do is bitch at the US. Â You should be thankful, even with it's faults, that we are the ones in power, not the Saddams' of the world. I hear George Bush compared to Hitler on this site. Â That my friend is twisted. Â To compare the honarable President of the United States, (I say that because I know you all hate him) to Hitler truly shows ignorance and spite.<span id='postcolor'> I am a European and a conservative, I am not a liberal or a pacifict and while I am not always a strong supporter of the US I fully support their right to defend themselves, Britain I expect will help. You generalising about 'Europeans' is as wrong as people generalising about Americans, especialy as Europe isn't a country.