Paratrooper

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Warin @ Sep. 01 2002,20:16)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">6--></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Red Oct @ Sep. 01 2002,176)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">they were probaly demiliterized, Out Door Army Navy Stores around my area have non functional hand gernades for $5.00. back on topic, why exactly should the russians fall back and leave the war, if anything more countries should help the russians.<span id='postcolor'> Why? Because the people of the area want to form their own government. Â It's been done by a lot of former republics, but because of oil interests the Russians ont want to let them go. Â This isnt about terrorism, this is about civil war. Â Its sad that the Russians have decided to paint it as a war on terror, because that is hardly what it is.<span id='postcolor'> I don't think that it is just oil, even if that is a factor. There is a bigger problem for the Russian government in leaving the conflict. Russia today is many states all with over strong local government, it can't afford to send the message out that terrorism and armed action is an option for Russian states. Just as Spain can't allow the Basque freedom though most people there want it; it would be a victory for the bomb and the bullet.

Accidents are sad but a soldier's job is a dangerous one, even in peacetime.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Intruder @ Sep. 01 2002,20:07)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">It seems like a re-edited version of the unfinished P-51 that was released, has the same bugs with the gear and guns, also an unfinished cockpit.<span id='postcolor'> I didn't download it, I wont bother if that is the case.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Jamesia @ Sep. 01 2002,20:22)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">0--></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Jamesia @ Sep. 01 2002,120)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">CAN SOMEONE PLEASE GIVE ME LINKS TO THE POLLS IN OTHER FORUMS?<span id='postcolor'> STOP MAKING ME THINK THAT THIS IS THE ONLY FORUM THAT IS DOING THIS POLL..........................................<span id='postcolor'> It is. but there was a thread on the old OFPEC forum, it wasn't very productive though.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">I can agree with your suggestion that ALL Palestinians be lumped together with respect to wanting their own state. There are probably very few who don't. However, I don't think it's fair to suggest that they ALL stand behind the same tactic (ie. terrorism). That just ain't true. It even sounds a bit racist, doesn't it? <span id='postcolor'> I don't know that it is racist, merely misinformed. The fact is that terrorism is a PRODUCT OF OCCUPATION, not some act of malice from the Palestinians.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Jester983 @ Sep. 01 2002,20:27)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Hope you learn stuff here that you never knew before. Â <span id='postcolor'> And even things you did!

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (denoir @ Sep. 01 2002,20:55)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">We'll see tomorrow.<span id='postcolor'> We'll see in the coming weeks what it all amounts to, if anything.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Warin @ Sep. 01 2002,20:55)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Paratrooper @ Sep. 01 2002,20:48)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Warin @ Sep. 01 2002,20:44)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">No..not more churches. Â More self sustaining underground civilisations! <span id='postcolor'> Either way... The radioactive dust of a nuked asteroid would be as devastating as a large solid impact.<span id='postcolor'> Dig me up the article. It sounds like hogwash to me. Â The earth is bombarded with radiation daily, and also there is a lot of space dust as well.<span id='postcolor'> Not millions of tons of radioactive dust at once! The article said; (this is from memory as I don't keep years worth of magazines) that fourty years warning would be needed to safely destroy such a rock.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (edc @ Sep. 01 2002,20:41)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">You could have the police as west and the criminals as east. Â <span id='postcolor'> Yes but that won't change their behaviour. A campaign can't just revolve around street fighting.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Warin @ Sep. 01 2002,20:44)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">No..not more churches. Â More self sustaining underground civilisations! <span id='postcolor'> Either way... The radioactive dust of a nuked asteroid would be as devastating as a large solid impact.

Wider problem

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Warin @ Sep. 01 2002,20:24)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Paratrooper @ Sep. 01 2002,18:44)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">A nuclear strike on an asteroid would just send a cloud of radioactive rock and dust to earth, nuclear winter anyone?<span id='postcolor'> LOL Good one Deris small enough to cause that sort of blanketing effect wont enter the atmosphere. Â If it did, the earth would have been in this situation long, long ago. Â If the debris is small enough it will burn up in the atmosphere. I think we need to come up with an effective way to divert large asteroids and such. Â But I dont think nuking it to oblivion is a practical idea. Â In the article, they mention sending some sort of propulsion unit to divert the course. Â Somehow I think this is the best idea.<span id='postcolor'> New Scientist magazine said that (what I said) a couple of years ago, after the deep impact film, there was quite a good article. Nuclear weapons are not the solution! I think we should just make more churches!

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (RalphWiggum @ Sep. 01 2002,19:47)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">hhmm..suddenly ran and Paratrooper storm in..and thread is going....spammarific. <span id='postcolor'> Anyway sorry, back on topic; do people think as I have heard said, that these attacks mark a build up to september the 11th?

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Duke_of_Ray @ Sep. 01 2002,19:37)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Wish there where some that worked during the day. I think making a large Police campaining for this game woud be awsome.<span id='postcolor'> It would be great but how to make criminals behave realistically?

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (denoir @ Sep. 01 2002,19:29)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (ran @ Sep. 01 2002,19:27)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Paratrooper @ Sep. 01 2002,19:16)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (denoir @ Sep. 01 2002,19:13)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Yes. I was going to say that earlier but never got around to it. The whole concept of ramming the jet into a embassy is ridiculous. The plane was going to London, so why not perforate Big Ben or the Buckingham palace?<span id='postcolor'> Because that would be unthinkable!<span id='postcolor'> was the destruction of the twin towers "thinkable" ?<span id='postcolor'> I think he was joking in some weird British way <span id='postcolor'> Correct. No offence intended.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (USMC Sniper @ Sep. 01 2002,19:27)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">I thought it was a Messerschmitt Me109? It should have 2 Mg's not 8, and i think the addon itself isnt of high quality, the cockpit and textures suck, it has the muzzle flash and propellor bugs, the landing gear goes the wrong way, etc, ill just wait for the WW2 Team Messerschmitt and spitfires. Â Â <span id='postcolor'> I thought it was a Spitfire, an early model Spitfire has eight machine guns and an early Me 109 has two and two cannons.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Duke_of_Ray @ Sep. 01 2002,19:26)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Is there any police cars with lights? Also how do you mod the cars and stuff in OFP?<span id='postcolor'> The police jeep has lights but only at night, and no siren.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (denoir @ Sep. 01 2002,19:13)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Yes. I was going to say that earlier but never got around to it. The whole concept of ramming the jet into a embassy is ridiculous. The plane was going to London, so why not perforate Big Ben or the Buckingham palace?<span id='postcolor'> Because that would be unthinkable!

Do they have 8 machine guns?

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (E6Hotel @ Sep. 01 2002,19:04)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Bernadotte @ Sep. 01 2002,16:47)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">In other words, how do you know there aren't any Palestinian versions of Rosa Parks, Martin Luther King Jr.s or Gandhis? And let's not forget that King's and Gandhi's people were not going up against tanks and Apache gunships.<span id='postcolor'> "Just when I thought I was out, they PULL me back IN!" - Michael Corleone There very well may be Palestinian equivalents (I hope there are), but we've got a saying in my line of work: One "Oh, [hell]" wipes out a lot of "Attaboys." Suicide bombings will not work, ESPECIALLY when the opposition has tanks and gunships. If the Palestinians only want their own state they need to re-think their tactics. Semper Fi<span id='postcolor'> Israel doesn't have the right to hold it from them in the first place! They should expect trouble if they want to occupy their negibours.

I really don't think a national anthem is neccessary, anyway I am really pleased to see a flag completed and agreed upon, and one that I influenced! I hope it will be distributed to ofp.info and such.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Duke_of_Ray @ Sep. 01 2002,18:55)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Some advice, spell better than me, and agree with me. <span id='postcolor'> A very easy task with a very hard one!

A nuclear strike on an asteroid would just send a cloud of radioactive rock and dust to earth, nuclear winter anyone?

Hello. Most of the Opertion Fashpoint stuff is here, but I would also sign up to ofpec.com, everything that isn't here is there.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (ran @ Sep. 01 2002,14:19)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Paratrooper @ Sep. 01 2002,14:12)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Albert Schweizer @ Sep. 01 2002,14:11)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Where do they get the money from? I mean such an AA launcher isnt realy cheap. On the other hand where else could you get a think like this on the black-market if not in Russia?<span id='postcolor'> They take what they can from Russian troops.<span id='postcolor'> ........... the chechens don't have any helicopter nor fixed wing aircraft that would need to be shot down .......... , they don't get these weapons from the captured russian army stocks since the russians don't use them in chechnya since they don't need them<span id='postcolor'> Logical, they must come through the black market then.