MDRZulu

Cumboy didnt you destroy the OFPEC forums, wtf are you doing here?

wait are those all real except for the last one, seriously I cant tell.

Wow that army green one is looking good, it looks alot better than his first one, I knew he could texture just look at the Hired-Gun Bell Jetranger he made.

That sentence actaully confused me at first too and now I get it and it makes perfect sense, the whole word have threw me off. I get it now you are saying have as you have evidence of a pilot that flew that many hours. He probably read the sentence wrong like me too because it did look like bad grammar but if you read it right its fine. However an A-10 will still make a sharper turn than an F-16 but think about this too an F-14 is more agile in lower speed combat with the wings out right? becuase it can go slower and use that more wingspan for more lift or whatever it would be in a turn. Same with an A-10 just that they can sweep their wings. Anyhow the topic is planes not being realistc not A-10's out turing F-16's. I think the hawk was a little overdone with how fast it could spin, ie ( 5000 airlieon rolls in about 1 second, well thats an exaggeration but you get the point) other than that I think the hawks flying characteristics were pretty well done and worked fine for ofp and the fast spins were avoidible if you didnt push your stick too far. People also have to realise that planes are not going to fly correctly in flashpoint unless some drastic changes were made in the engine or something.

One pic, it is at an angle you probably wont be able to use it but I dont know what you really need.

Sadico, the g's increase with speed in the turn and with increasing speed in a turn the wider the turn is. I'd put my money down that a hawk can outurn an F-22, you gotta take into consideration too that an aircraft with a lower max speed is gonna handle better within its speed range than an F-22 which can go much faster. If a hawk could go that fast maybe it couldnt out turn it. Keep in mind that most fighter trainers are more agile than fighters within their speed range ie. a T-38 (F-5), and a hawk is a trainer in many countries. Another problem people are making is assuming that the speed is in mph or nautical mph, its not its in kilometers per hour thats why the numbers are so much larger. I dont know for sure but I bet none of you took the time to convert those speed figures into knots, mph or whatever you said.

I hate to base another thing on Black Hawk Down, but it's the book this time, but some of the soldiers were injured more by deciding not to wear armor plates in the back but they wore them in the front. The bullets entered their backs and richochet off the plate in the front causing more damage. True fact, Im sure they were shot with some sort of AK .I dont give a shit about what the super ionic trajectory magnosphere book told you. Most of the people that read that shit and come here and post all this meaningless crap havent even shot a gun. I cant say ive ever shot an ak-47 at a steel plate myself. But go by what vets say atleast, that is what really happens and the statistics are crap.

All of the ones I've seen have kind of a flat black spraypainted color.

If it is possible to edit the player models slightly I'd like to see maybe some US Rangers (goggles, full packs, knee pads and all that). For vehicles some ideas are a Landrover or some sort of pick up truck, a special forces dune buggy (dont know the correct names) pic, and for helicopters my ideas are a civilian AS350, a CH-53, and a Gazelle pic. Anyway thats as many ideas as I could think of.

i got it in the helicopter section....try this

cool

Its pretty damn good, I love the sound and this is the only huey ive seen that actually looks like one. Somebody needs to hook him up with oxygen because there are things he couldn't do because he doesnt have it, ie. when you walk around it you get stopped at the same places as you would if it were a blackhawk. Im not complaining but if he signed up for oxy he deserves and if he hasnt he shouldnt have any problem getting it. Nice work Martin, by far one of the best addons ive seen.

Downloading it now!, this should be good.

I hope so, I check his site 5 times a day probably.

Interesting... it says 99% now, I checked it about 5 minutes before this post and he basically said all the stuff I said in the beginning. Either he is messing with his site or we gotta wait a little longer for it

Martin's Site Scroll down

dont look porn, and I dont know what you can do about pop-ups.

Black Hawk Down made me somewhat mad because they made it so there was a main character (Eversmann) and they made him do more in the movie than he really did. If I were Sgt. Eversmann that would offend me actually, though he can probably pick up chicks alot easier now. I don't remember exactly but I also think that they completely left out Howe ( in the book he is the most experienced soldier fighting) in the movie I dont remember him. I just recently saw apocalypse now redux, that was a good movie, especially the air cav parts and when they steal the CO's surfboard.

I put in an IP and I behind the windows98SE NAT and in sockets nothing shows up but has soon as I hit directplay the game appears then disapears when I click back on sockets.

I read that it was 1.55 but I never thought of that, could have been 1.46 for all know. Scratch this post Id have to do a real test.

Somebody reply here and ask if join in progress is going to be implemented, and remember flamers I didnt ask for it I just asked someone else who wants it to ask for it.

well imagine a battle lasting days to take an island because players can join in and enter the fight, and imagine gaining back those 4 players you lose everytime you launch a game.

That is the PV3s sound, hopefully they are changing it. They changed alot of sounds from the first demo in the original game.

How do I turn tracers off and where, I think they look kind of stupid.

No no, what about this sorry couldnt help but doing that.