Translated via google ... sorry!
But i think most of u will understand.
SON: Dad, why we had to attack the Iraq?
DAD: Because they had WMD.
SON: But the supervisors found no WMD.
DAD: Because the Iraqis it hid.
SON: And therefore we conquered the Iraq?
DAD: Yes. Conquests always work better than inspections.
SON: But after we had conquered it, we still found no WMD, or?
DAD: Because the weapons are so well hidden. No concerns, we will find something, probably briefly before the elections in 2004.
SON: Why did the Iraq want to have alls these WMD?
DAD: In order to use it in the war.
SON: I am confused. If they had all these weapons, why didn’t they use them, when we had war with them?
DAD: Now, obviously they didn’t want like the fact that somebody knows that they have these weapons and so decided to die in thousands rather than defending themself.
SON: That does not make a sense. Why should they decide to die if they had all these powerful weapons, with which they could defend themselves?
DAD: It is a different culture. It does not have to make a sense.
SON: I don’t know, how u think about it, but I do not believe that they had any of these weapons, of which our government said that they had her.
DAD: It is not important whether they had the weapons. We had another good reason to attack them.
SON: And which was that?
DAD: Even if the Iraq did not have WMD, Saddam Hussein was a bad dictator, which also is a good reason to attack another country.
SON: Why? What does a bad dictator do, that it is correct to attack its country?
SON: See, among other things he tortured his own people.
SON: As it it in China?
DAD: Do not compare China with the Iraq. China is a good economic competitor, where millions of people work for slave wages in Sweatshops, in order to enrich US companies.
SON: If thus a country exploits its people for the profit of American companies is it a good country, even if it tortures its people?
DAD: Correct.
SON: Why were the people in the Iraq tortured? DAD: To a large extent for political crimes, to criticize like the government. People, which criticized the government in the Iraq, were put into the prison and tortured.
SON: Is that not exactly what happens in China?
DAD: I already said it, China is something.
SON: What is the difference between China and the Iraq?
DAD: Look, among other things the Iraq was controlled by the Baath party, but China is communist.
SON: Didn't you say to me times ago that communists are bad?
DAD: Err o, only Cuban communists are bad.
SON: Why are the Cuban communists bad?
DAD: Look, among other things people, which criticize the Cuban government, are put into the prison and tortured.
SON: As in the Iraq?
DAD: Exactly.
SON: And how about China?
DAD: As i already said: China is a good economic partner, Cuba on the other hand isnt.
SON: How does it come that Cuba is not a good economic partner?
DAD: Look, at that time into the 60s our government issued some laws, which made it illegal for Americans to trade with Cuba trade,to make them no more communists and be capitalists as we are.
SON: But if we would cancel these laws , wouldn’t make trading with Cuba help the Cubans to become capitalists?
DAD: To be a “know-it-allâ€.
SON: I do not think that I am one.
DAD: Look, they also have no freedom of religion on Cuba.
SON: As in China with the Falun gong movement?
DAD: I said it: stop talking badly about China. In any case Saddam came to power by a militaerputsch , it is thus anyway no legal leader.
F. What is a Militaerputsch?
DAD: That is, when a military general takes over the government of a country by force, instead of with elections, as we make it in the USA.
SON: Didn't the leader of Pakistan come by a Militaerputsch to power?
DAD: You mean general Pervez Musharraf? Aeh, he is, but Pakistan is our friend.
SON: Why is Pakistan our friend if its leader is not legal?
DAD: I never said that Pervez Musharraf is not legal.
SON: Have you not said that a military general, who to power comes, by revoking the legal government of a country by force is not a legal leader?
DAD: Only Saddam Hussein. Pervez Musharraf is our friend because he us helped to attack Afghanistan.
SON: Why did we attack Afghanistan?
DAD: Because of what they did to us on 11 September.
SON: What did Afghanistan to us on 11 September?
DAD: Now, on 11 September 19 men - fifteen of them from Saudi Arabia - have four of our airplanes kidnapped and flew them into buildings in New York and Washington and killed 4,000 humans.
SON: And what has Afghanistan thereby made?
DAD: In Afghanistan these bad humans were trained, under the suppressing power of the Taliban.
SON: Isn't the Taliban these bad radical Islamics, who chopped off humans of hands and heads? DAD: Yes, exactly those. Not only that they chopped off humans of hands and heads, they suppressed also women.
SON: Didn't the Bush government give to the Taliban in May 2001 43 million US dollar?
DAD: Yes, but that was a reward, because they successfully proceeded against the drugs.
SON: Against drugs?
DAD: Yes, the Taliban were very helpful to stop the Opiumproduction.
SON: How do they have the gotten so well?
DAD: Completely simply. If people produced Opium the Taliban had their hands and their head chopped off.
SON: If the Taliban chopped off hands and the head, because they cultivated plants, this was correct, but not, if they chopped off the people for other reasons the hands and the head?
DAD: Exactly. It is for us correct, if radical Islamic fundamentalists people chops off the hands because they produce drugs, but it is bad, if they chop off the people the hands, because they stole bread.
SON: Don’t they also chop off the people in Saudi Arabia?
DAD: That is other one. Afghanistan was governed by a tyrannic patriarchat, which suppressed women and forced them to carry in the Burkas with stoneing as punishment for the women, if it not obeyed.
SON: Do Saudi women in the public have to carry not also for Burkas?
DAD: No, Saudi women carry only a tradional Islamic body coverage.
SON: What is the difference?
DAD: The traditional Islamic body coverage, what it is carried by Saudi women, is a puritanic and nevertheless elegant piece of clothing, which covers the whole female body except the eyes and the fingers. The Burka, on the other side, is a bad tool of the patriarchalen suppression, which covers the whole female body except the eyes and the fingers.
SON: That sounds like the same thing with different names.
DAD: Naja, you cannot compare Saudi Arabia with Afghanistan. The Saudis are our friends.
SON: But, I thought, 15 of the 19 hi-jackers from 11 September came from Saudi Arabia.
DAD: Yes, but they trained in Afghanistan.
SON: Who trained it?
DAD: A very bad man with the name Osama is shop.
SON: Was he from Afghanistan?
DAD: Aeh, no, he also comes from Saudi Arabia. But he is worse, a very bad man.
SON: I believe, I remember times he was our friend.
DAD: Only as we helped him and his Mujaheddeen in the 80s to strike back the Soviet invasion in Afghanistan.
SON: Who were the Soviets? Was that the bad communist Imperium, of which Ronald Reagan spoke?
DAD: There are no more Soviets. The Soviet Union has itself 1990 dissolved and now to have it in such a way elections and capitalism like we. We call now it Russians.
SON: The Soviets - I mean the Russians - are now our friends?
DAD: Na, not really. Look, they were our friends many years, after they had stopped being Soviets, but then they decided to not support our attack on the Iraq and furious we are now on them. We are also furious on the Frenchmen and the Germans because they didnt also help us.
SON: So the Frenchmen and the Germans are bad?
DAD: Not really badly, but bad enough that we had to rename "French fries" and "French toast" in "Freedom Fries" and "Freedom toast".
SON: Do we designate always food over, if a country does not do, what we from it want?
DAD: No, we make that only with our friends. We attack our enemies.
SON: But wasn’t the Iraq into the 80s our friend?
DAD: Its a time long.
SON: Was Saddam Hussein at that time already leader of the Iraq?
DAD: Yes, but at this time he fought against Iran, which made him occasional our friend.
SON: And that made him our friend?
DAD: Yes, because at this time Iran was our enemy.
SON: Doesn't he gased the Kurds at the time?
DAD: Yes, but since he fought against Iran, we looked away, in order to show it that we are its friend.
SON: So is everyone, who fights against our enemies, automatically our friend?
DAD: To a large extent.
SON: And everyone, that fight against our friends becomes automatically our enemy?
DAD: Sometimes is correct also. But is is even better, if American companies can earn by suppling both sides
SON: Why?
DAD: Because war is good for the economy, which means that war is good for America. And God is on the side of America, and each war opponent is an un-American communist. Do you understand now, why we attacked the Iraq?
SON: I think so. We attacked it, because God wanted it, correctly?
DAD: Yes.
SON: But from where did we knew that God wanted that?
DAD: See, God speaks directly to George W. Bush and says to him, what he has to do.
SON: In the final result we attacked the Iraq, because George W. Bush hears voices?
DAD: Yes! Finally you understood, how the world functions. Now close your eyes and sleep. Good night.
SON: Good night, dad.
