king homer

We're still working on it.

What about M827 APFSDS? Wasn't that used as 120 mm shell aswell?

Range, firepower and muzzlevelocity.

Range, firepower, muzzlevelocity, reliability.

It doesn't.

Depending on how much you're willing to pack or how many boxes more?

But be aware: the pictures/blueprint do not show a T-55QM.

Yes I used the ch_sounds.pbo so it may be the problem you described. About the ammunition storage, so far most sources say 11.400 rounds. Where NWD got that info I don't know, the problem is he didn't mention the sources where that data is from.

Just tested the M1A1 and I must say: Excellent job on the textures and the model additions. I really like the way the woodland looks, my M1A1 has serious problems at this point. Overall its a nice and handy addon to improve the the current BIS models. So far I've also find some minor realism glitches: The commander M2 comes with 1.000 rounds of ammunition, but as M9ACE posted already in the old thread it should have 100 rounds less. Same goes for the coaxial and loader machineguns. I counted 4x2800 for the coax and 20x100 for the loaders. Thats together 13.200 rounds of 7.62 but all in all the M1 should have a maximum of 11.400 rounds. And finally the sounds for the engine are too weak, it sounds like you're driving a 4-cylinder car?

Progress is good. The M1 Abrams series is already in final beta stage. ACE will come with M1A1, M1A1 HA, M1A2, M1A2 SEP, M1A2 TUSK and M1A2 SEP TUSK.

I second that.

Top: M1A1 Middle: M1A2 TUSK Bottom: M1A2

No worries - it's already done.

There are a load of different field modfications, earlier TUSK variants and so on. We decided to have the TUSK variant seen on your first picture - including reactive and slat armor along with the RCWS for the commander instead of a normal M2 and the TAGS as loader protection.

With these values the M60 is much more realistic IMHO and not a one shot one kill monster (which it really shouldnt be). It'll still kill a T72 in 2-3 hits (depending on where you strike it) and is a perfect match for the Russian tank (unlike the unfair M1A1 - T72 trade). I've made the tank shells 6th sense tracer compatible as well! Hope to see these or comparable tweaks in an official release sometime Hmm instead of the M833 shell I'd use already the M900 which represents the latest APFSDS for the 105 mm M68. Furthermore the standard loadout of the M60 is 63 shells ... probably 20 APFSDS, 23 HEAT and 20 HEP.

I guess the positions are hardcoded - so this shouldn'te be possible.

Which things from the TUSK? The TAGS for the loader or what?

I'm working on a M1A2

Umm we might get a head to head run with Mateck.

Edit

You may have a look here.

The .50cal can be fired by the TC from the inside. Yes that is my point, outside of the TUSK kit I haven't seen anything about the TC being able to fire it from inside. Thus I was asking if the non TUSK variants will be corrected in having the line of code (which I can't remember) that allows the TC to fire from inside removed. You're talking about "inGunnerMayFire" command for the config, but believe me, M1A1 TC are able to fire the M2 from the inside. Not only with the RCWS brought in by TUSK.

The .50cal can be fired by the TC from the inside.

And what do you want to tell me?

You mean the MCD - Missile Countermeasure Device. It's a nice Abrams. Do you plan to equip the M1A1 aswell with TUSK or just the M1A2? And what about the ammunition loadout? Selectable or predefined - I mean more for urban combat or the AT role?