Kasatka
Member-
Content Count
143 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Never -
Medals
Community Reputation
0 NeutralAbout Kasatka
-
Rank
Sergeant
-
The mother and fader of the modern rifles..... the AK-47 it's my option.. Â Let's see this bealty in action... http://i.guns.ru/club/ak_anim.gif Simple and deadly...... Edit(R.G.): Next time make a link if you want to show a huge pic/animation.
-
I bought because the nice looking box.. , since I never heard about this game before...... But since I install this game... he is the best game I have here... Thanks BIS,,, I love this game..
-
BIS whats happen to the sounds?? ... M16 sounds and Ak sounds are horrible.... why FN FAL have the same sound as the H&K G3? I hope you fix it in the next patch... BTW- I love resistance, very nice looking graphics, bealtifull island, nice campaing... very good BIS... of course the game have some bugs... but nothing that can't be fixed in the nexts updades... Thank's again BIS
-
</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Abrams @ July 05 2002,09:51)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">But I think that BIS will do patches for fix all bugs....<span id='postcolor'> I hope so.....
-
</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Abrams @ July 05 2002,09:51)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">But I think that BIS will do patches for fix all bugs....<span id='postcolor'> I hope so.....
-
</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (RedStorm @ July 05 2002,10:31)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Kasatka @ July 05 2002,21:26)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Well, I think that in reality BIS didn't make the V-80, they make a mixture with the Ka-50 and the V-80... a bad mixture heehehe....:D V-80 Ka-50 But I like it.... is better than nothing... I hope in the next updates they fix these problems... like the icon and the sound.... and the weapons.. put 80mm rockets and at least the AT-9 ... but AT-16 would be great.... Â <span id='postcolor'> The test model of the Ka-50 Hokum (the V-80 we have in-game) Â didn't carry AT-16 Anti-Tank missiles back then. They either carried the AT-9 or the AT-6 (?)<span id='postcolor'> Exactily, that's why I say that I think that BIS make a mixture bettwin tha Ka-50 and the V-80.....
-
</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (RedStorm @ July 05 2002,10:31)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Kasatka @ July 05 2002,21:26)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Well, I think that in reality BIS didn't make the V-80, they make a mixture with the Ka-50 and the V-80... a bad mixture heehehe....:D V-80 Ka-50 But I like it.... is better than nothing... I hope in the next updates they fix these problems... like the icon and the sound.... and the weapons.. put 80mm rockets and at least the AT-9 ... but AT-16 would be great.... Â <span id='postcolor'> The test model of the Ka-50 Hokum (the V-80 we have in-game) Â didn't carry AT-16 Anti-Tank missiles back then. They either carried the AT-9 or the AT-6 (?)<span id='postcolor'> Exactily, that's why I say that I think that BIS make a mixture bettwin tha Ka-50 and the V-80.....
-
</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Eviscerator @ July 04 2002,23:58)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">well ive already made a new .cpp for the ka-50 making the new weapons (AT-16 and 80mm rockets, and also the correct gun where the pilot can select the rpm of the bullets), finally the abrams dont have such an advantage over the russians, ive also fixed it so the ai will attack aircraft with the gun as its also meant to be used for that....anyway ive just got in contact with the texturer and he says 4 hours till they are done, which means another 30 minutes for upload/tweaking (already tested the .cpp to destruction)<span id='postcolor'> I love your news hheheehehhe thx...
-
</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Eviscerator @ July 04 2002,23:58)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">well ive already made a new .cpp for the ka-50 making the new weapons (AT-16 and 80mm rockets, and also the correct gun where the pilot can select the rpm of the bullets), finally the abrams dont have such an advantage over the russians, ive also fixed it so the ai will attack aircraft with the gun as its also meant to be used for that....anyway ive just got in contact with the texturer and he says 4 hours till they are done, which means another 30 minutes for upload/tweaking (already tested the .cpp to destruction)<span id='postcolor'> I love your news hheheehehhe thx...
-
Well, I think that in reality BIS didn't make the V-80, they make a mixture with the Ka-50 and the V-80... a bad mixture heehehe....:D V-80 Ka-50 But I like it.... is better than nothing... I hope in the next updates they fix these problems... like the icon and the sound.... and the weapons.. put 80mm rockets and at least the AT-9 ... but AT-16 would be great....
-
Well, I think that in reality BIS didn't make the V-80, they make a mixture with the Ka-50 and the V-80... a bad mixture heehehe....:D V-80 Ka-50 But I like it.... is better than nothing... I hope in the next updates they fix these problems... like the icon and the sound.... and the weapons.. put 80mm rockets and at least the AT-9 ... but AT-16 would be great....
-
</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Tex [uSMC] @ July 02 2002,10:22)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Mi-26? not familiar with that model. Probably because it doesnt exist<span id='postcolor'> Damn after that..... well I won't say nothing....
-
</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Tex [uSMC] @ July 02 2002,10:22)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Mi-26? not familiar with that model. Probably because it doesnt exist<span id='postcolor'> Damn after that..... well I won't say nothing....
-
</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Tex [uSMC] @ July 02 2002,10:22)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Mi-26? not familiar with that model. Probably because it doesnt exist<span id='postcolor'> Damn after that..... well I won't say nothing....
-
*** NATO and Russia Look to Work Together in Air NATO`s top general in Moscow said Monday the alliance and Russia were looking to work together on giant transport aircraft and midair refueling to get closer defense cooperation off the ground. Major-General Peter Williams, head of the newly opened NATO Military Liaison Mission in Moscow, told reporters he was cautiously optimistic about cooperation on air transport. Williams said governments had to provide hard cash if they want to realize the commitment to defense cooperation made at the NATO-Russia Council`s founding summit outside Rome in May. In a first decision, the two sides agreed in June to create an international sea rescue service, to respond to disasters like the August 2000 loss of the Kursk submarine. Williams said NATO experts talked to Russian officials last year about cooperating on giant military cargo planes like the An-70 being jointly developed by Russia and Ukraine. The aircraft had a troubled birth. A midair collision destroyed the first prototype in 1995 killing its seven-man crew. The second prototype crashed in January last year. The plane was snubbed two years ago by European governments in favor of Airbus Industrie`s A400M military transporter. If NATO is serious about working with Russia on the aircraft, it would represent a reversal of policy, which analysts believe was prompted by European countries. Unlike the United States, the European Union lacks heavy lift capacity as it seeks a more ambitious security role, notably with the creation of a rapid reaction force by 2003. ``I think from the indications we have received it is the air-to-air refueling aspect that may be what the Russian Federation authorities are interested in,`` Williams said. ``These are areas in which both the Russian armed forces and NATO have a lot of experience, although it`s not clear whether they are capable of acting together.`` Independent defense analyst Alexander Golts said that the two sides clearly wanted to put flesh on the bones of the NATO-Russia Council. ``It looks like they prefer to have some small programs in order to prove to everybody that this cooperation can work,`` Golts said. By Jon Boyle /Reuters/