Jump to content

JimLad

Member
  • Content Count

    51
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Medals

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About JimLad

  • Rank
    Lance Corporal
  1. JimLad

    2nd Beta 1.07.5157 feedback thread

    I tried 1.07 and got more graphics corruption than 1.05, and that was with the hotfix
  2. JimLad

    8007000e Error in Vista

    Well I tried Vista and found I got a lot of LOD issues So I'm trying XP x64 now ( so as to address my 4GB ram) and its ok so far. Only thing was I got 8007000e error last night. I am testing running maxmem=1024 and 2048 now to see if that helps.
  3. Great, but as has been said before we need burned out textures too. Is this possible?
  4. I too am using these drivers and they do seem to run Arma quite nicely. However I found 1.07 to have too many texture problems, so I went back to 1.05+.
  5. JimLad

    Forceware 160.02 + 8800 + ARMA nice combo

    I too am using these drivers and they do seem to run Arma quite nicely. However I found 1.07 to have too many texture problems, so I went back to 1.05+.
  6. JimLad

    8007000e Error in Vista

    Sickboy, is Arma playable under Vista now? I had to go back to XP32 before because of LOD issues etc. However I now have 4GB of pc6400, but XP32 only sees 3 gig. I want to go back to Vista 64 to see all of the memory, but will only do so if Arma runs ok
  7. JimLad

    Patch 1.08

    I think they should concentrate only on getting the damn game to run properly, instead of adding new content
  8. JimLad

    Public Beta Patch 1.07.5154

    Yep, it's a lot worse with 1.07 than 1.05+. Did BIS not test this patch with 8800s?
  9. JimLad

    FDF sound pack v1.0

    Has anyone got FDF working with the ArmA beta patch? My shortcut is - "C:\Program Files\Bohemia Interactive\ArmA\startbetapatch.bat" -mod=FDF_Sounds But I don't get the good sounds
  10. JimLad

    The Value of FPS (And a bit of a rant)

    It's all very well saying that ArmA will require future spec machines to run at max settings...but is it justified? I look at the graphics on my setup (3GHz C2Duo, 640MB 8800 gts) and don't see much to warrant the poor performance. Even on medium settings it's not smooth. Whether that is a problem with the game or the drivers I am not sure.
  11. JimLad

    ArmA Photography I - No images over 100kb.

    I took a panoramic shot with 10km view distance  Panorama Oh yeah and it's pretty smooth, definately playable. It stutters a bit when I fly around though, probably need more than 2GB ram
  12. JimLad

    I enjoy ArmA!

    ArmA stealing Crysis' thunder? Please . Not even in the same league, but hardly surprising given Crysis will have a much larger budget.
  13. JimLad

    official complaint to BIS

    Well I just finished the campaign, though I really wasn't expecting it to end.  What a disappointment  It was so short, and lacked any continuity.  There were no characters and story to speak of.  The single player experience absolutely pales in significance compared to OFP.  I really don't understand what BIS have been doing for all these years, aside from tarting up the graphics.  Even then we've got a game riddled with bugs, scripting errors and graphical problems.  I'm really disappointed Â
  14. JimLad

    help! - graphical issues

    Well I even reinstalled XP to try ArmA, and it was exactly the same as under Vista - terrible performance, missing textures
×