Hardliner

I like the iron sight. I seem to hit more with the iron sight. targets at a distance are easy to hit using iron sight. For the first time in the campaigns I can kill alot of enemy troops before my AI buddies do. With the normal sight I could never hit the target right. Iron sight is more accurate. Its good to use with the full automatic weapons too, in the first Red Hammer mission I cut down most of the civilians myself with a few seconds on the triger before they could shoot me or my comrades

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (PitViper @ Mar. 10 2002,19:42)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Hardliner @ Mar. 10 2002,08:48)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Read this. http://www.cnn.com/2002/US/03/09/nuclear.weapons/index.html<span id='postcolor'> do you understand what the English word "contingency" means? Â sheesh...<span id='postcolor'> HAHAHA do you think my second language was English? Â And you go on about "contingency" but USA bombs other countries and condems them for doing EXACTLY what USA does. sheesh... wake up boy. USA just named all potenitial targets for nuking. USA will be the cause of World War 3 and will be the death of everyone.

That is a good mission with good music.

That is a good mission with good music.

There is a limit for each side, about 60 or more groups per side (group also meaning one unit) is allowed I think. I tried putting alot of units in a map and it told me there was a limit, but of course that was in the Mission Editer. With this it would mean that there would probably only be that many units on the map at any given time. Maybe as units are destroyed more a created to fill their place.

Denoir... every point a good point.

Oh and I have seen death so many times in this game that it wouldn't make any difference if there was any death in this mission

Oh and I have seen death so many times in this game that it wouldn't make any difference if there was any death in this mission

The mission is ok for a change from the war that goes on in other missions. Altho I HATE the slow motion part when the guy runs with the US flag. HAHAHA slow mo is so not good. But if you wanted a slow none conflict change from battle just goto the Mission Editer put yourself on an Island in a truck or whatever car you want and go for a drive around the Island. Soon you get to know the Island and it helps for missions (if you ain't finished them already) "Red Hammer" is a dam great addon!

The mission is ok for a change from the war that goes on in other missions. Altho I HATE the slow motion part when the guy runs with the US flag. HAHAHA slow mo is so not good. But if you wanted a slow none conflict change from battle just goto the Mission Editer put yourself on an Island in a truck or whatever car you want and go for a drive around the Island. Soon you get to know the Island and it helps for missions (if you ain't finished them already) "Red Hammer" is a dam great addon!

I'm not sure how much ammo real weapons have but yeah it would be good to have more shots espcially for the AT weapon. Would real troops have only 2 flares? not sure.

The MI-17 is the HIP.

I like the Russian units in general, however I still like being any unit. Just because the Abrams has more armor does not mean its better. My M1 has been knocked out of action by T72s, in fact many times my platoon of M1s has been polverised by T72s . I'v gone head to head with the M1 in my T80 and won many times. I don't use things simply because their "better" or "faster" or more "armored", but I do like being in everything every now and then.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (PitViper @ Mar. 09 2002,19:45)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Nagual @ Mar. 09 2002,12)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (PitViper @ Mar. 07 2002,15:12)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">of course you could. Â you are proudly flying a flag of totalitarian communism. <!--emo&<span id='postcolor'> What about totalitarian capitalisim? How many know about the US intent to invaded afghanistain for months prior to s11. Paskistani intelligence were informed by the US 3 months before s11. Talks between the US gov and the Taliban to build a caspian sea oil pipeline across afghanistan failed, the US was not happy at all (The Bush family, + Cheny, have massive investments in Oil and Weapons production companies). "Domination" is in US foriegn policy, read the fine print, it is an essential working mechanisim within capitalism. Like Hardliner said, there is much more that can be said about global politics, so much its barley worth saying. No government is perfect, nor system of governing. You would probably cry if you knew the truth <span id='postcolor'> Thanks for the conspiracy theory Agent Mulder LOL! Its funny when you kooks come out with this crap. Maybe you can tell me what weapon companies these are? Â How about oil companies? Surely you'd know this info if you knew the above for fact.. Also, Â to my knowledge, the U.S military surely wasn't planning any long term invasion deployment anywhere near that area before Sept 11. Â There is no evidence of any preparation for that. Â Are you suggesting that just one fine day the military command was going to tell the services to get on a boat and head there without preparing and without any cataclysmic event to back it up? Â Even better is the idea that the U.S would "invade" afghanistan without prior consultation with China and Russia! LOL!!! Sorry, your little "theory" doesnt pass the "whiff" test.<span id='postcolor'> Domination is in US foriegn policy... how true... your a blind fool if you can't see that. Read this. http://www.cnn.com/2002/US/03/09/nuclear.weapons/index.html

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (PitViper @ Mar. 09 2002,19:45)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Nagual @ Mar. 09 2002,12)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (PitViper @ Mar. 07 2002,15:12)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">of course you could. Â you are proudly flying a flag of totalitarian communism. <!--emo&<span id='postcolor'> What about totalitarian capitalisim? How many know about the US intent to invaded afghanistain for months prior to s11. Paskistani intelligence were informed by the US 3 months before s11. Talks between the US gov and the Taliban to build a caspian sea oil pipeline across afghanistan failed, the US was not happy at all (The Bush family, + Cheny, have massive investments in Oil and Weapons production companies). "Domination" is in US foriegn policy, read the fine print, it is an essential working mechanisim within capitalism. Like Hardliner said, there is much more that can be said about global politics, so much its barley worth saying. No government is perfect, nor system of governing. You would probably cry if you knew the truth <span id='postcolor'> Thanks for the conspiracy theory Agent Mulder LOL! Its funny when you kooks come out with this crap. Maybe you can tell me what weapon companies these are? Â How about oil companies? Surely you'd know this info if you knew the above for fact.. Also, Â to my knowledge, the U.S military surely wasn't planning any long term invasion deployment anywhere near that area before Sept 11. Â There is no evidence of any preparation for that. Â Are you suggesting that just one fine day the military command was going to tell the services to get on a boat and head there without preparing and without any cataclysmic event to back it up? Â Even better is the idea that the U.S would "invade" afghanistan without prior consultation with China and Russia! LOL!!! Sorry, your little "theory" doesnt pass the "whiff" test.<span id='postcolor'> Domination is in US foriegn policy... how true... your a blind fool if you can't see that. Read this. http://www.cnn.com/2002/US/03/09/nuclear.weapons/index.html

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Greadius @ Mar. 07 2002,21:51)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Too bad it wasn't powerful and good enough to give it to those people whose nations is occupied and gave a puppet government. Or is there another reason my East German family didn't recieve any of those 'wonders' of Communism. Especially on the Health care... Yes, wonderful healthcare and social services. Â A country that has to shoot people to stop them from leaving has self evident virtues.<span id='postcolor'> Communism is suppost to work. It does have problems like every other type. It is also corrupted by greed, want for power, and plain ignorance. Maybe it could be refinded a bit just like Democracy should. I'm not trying to instigate conflict (if thats the right word for it) but correct me if I'm wrong but wasn't Russia's economy down the drain? if so how could they vouch for everything? Just a thought, no conflict ment.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Greadius @ Mar. 07 2002,21:51)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Too bad it wasn't powerful and good enough to give it to those people whose nations is occupied and gave a puppet government. Or is there another reason my East German family didn't recieve any of those 'wonders' of Communism. Especially on the Health care... Yes, wonderful healthcare and social services. Â A country that has to shoot people to stop them from leaving has self evident virtues.<span id='postcolor'> Communism is suppost to work. It does have problems like every other type. It is also corrupted by greed, want for power, and plain ignorance. Maybe it could be refinded a bit just like Democracy should. I'm not trying to instigate conflict (if thats the right word for it) but correct me if I'm wrong but wasn't Russia's economy down the drain? if so how could they vouch for everything? Just a thought, no conflict ment.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Wobble @ Mar. 07 2002,22:08)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">so the idea of a T-80 hitting the frotal armor of a M1A1 and completely destroying it with a single shot.. is just not realistic..<span id='postcolor'> This never happens to me. Altho in the Heavy Metal mission sometimes my platoon of M1s gets wiped out by T72s... but NEVER with one shot.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (DodgeME @ Mar. 07 2002,17:05)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">2. Realistic speed. The tanks seem to go slow when climbing a not to steap hill like 10-20 degrees!<span id='postcolor'> I notice when my platoon of tanks goes up a hill that the AI tanks always have no problem, but my tank always struggles to get up hills that they just fly up. Is the key you use to run faster also the key you press to make the tank faster? it does not seem to be the case.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Tovarish @ Mar. 07 2002,15:18)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (PitViper @ Mar. 07 2002,15:12)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">of course you could. Â you are proudly flying a flag of totalitarian communism.<span id='postcolor'> Now you're just egging him on<span id='postcolor'> No I know better than that.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Tovarish @ Mar. 07 2002,15:18)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (PitViper @ Mar. 07 2002,15:12)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">of course you could. Â you are proudly flying a flag of totalitarian communism.<span id='postcolor'> Now you're just egging him on<span id='postcolor'> No I know better than that.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Chan @ Mar. 06 2002,22:30)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">My my my... how fast a Operation Flashpoint forum post can turn into a policital disscussion.. Â <span id='postcolor'> You think THIS is a political disscussion? I could MAKE a political debate but I am going to spare this forum of any hostillity.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Chan @ Mar. 06 2002,22:30)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">My my my... how fast a Operation Flashpoint forum post can turn into a policital disscussion.. Â <span id='postcolor'> You think THIS is a political disscussion? I could MAKE a political debate but I am going to spare this forum of any hostillity.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (IsthatyouJohnWayne @ Mar. 06 2002,19:15)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">HOPEFULLY more lives will be saved in the long run by this current action, but we can only hope....<span id='postcolor'> Sorry but I have to disagree with you on this point.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (IsthatyouJohnWayne @ Mar. 06 2002,19:15)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">HOPEFULLY more lives will be saved in the long run by this current action, but we can only hope....<span id='postcolor'> Sorry but I have to disagree with you on this point.