Eagle Eyez

Kill 100+ people with 1 or 2 bombs? We arn't talking about putting really big bombs into this game. There are plenty of bombs that do much less area damage then that. We never said bombers with nuclear warheads or the A bomb. Just smaller bombs for air cover for troops. I can think of plenty of new missions I could make if only we had a bomber in the game. I think this game would be even better with bombers, so much more things you could do with them in there. Don't worry RedStorm, we'll get you wanting bombers in the game too, just give us time

Man if it's an infantry simulator take out the jeeps, tanks and heli's! I mean, many people have more fun using those on missions and while playing MP! Wait if they did that OFP wouldn't be that great anymore. Come on and stop being so close minded to the bomber idea, if you don't like it fine. Just don't use them. But don't keep trying discourge people from making an addon bomber so the majority of us can enjoy it. (Edited by Eagle Eyez at 3:50 am on Oct. 27, 2001)

If you have bombers you don't need infantry? Then why have infantry in Afgan and just not keep bombing? Because it's not effective. Plus you could set it up so the bombers arn't over powerful. Now look at helis. You can missle things on the groud just as well if not better then a bomber. I think a bomber is a GREAT idea. But everyone is entitled to their own opinions.

Yeah having soldiers surrender at times would make this a lot more realistic and fun. Would like to see it added built in but we'll probably need to wait for OFP2.

I would love to see a bomber added. To bad I don't have the know how or resources at this time to make my own for everyone to use.