Crazysheep

But why hsould he take photos, when he has a nice pretty report from the UN to bring back to the CIA saying that they have destroyed the weapons..... I am quite amazed that in 2 pages nobody has pointed out to you that the UN destroyed Saddams WMDs way back in 1997..........I thought that was common knowledge.

Does anyone else get annoyed by the lack of respect for the meaning of words nowadays? Damn newspeak.

The middle east peace process is not going to work, I reckon. The objectives of the Iraq war were a disaster, and it doesn't look like Israel is going to remove its settlements.

Actually, its 70 overall. There's been a hell of a lot killed in accidents, as a weapons dump exploded and there was a couple of helicopter crashes.

No! In times of war you have to make clear that you are strict on imposing rules and order. Otherwise there is no way to succeed in the long-term. To a certain extent I believe shooting into the crowd can indeed be the right solution! (sounds barbaric I know, but lets be realistic) I beg to differ. Ruling with an iron fist does not realistically help control order, as you only make the Iraqis more willing to resist.

Interesting. This sort of thing, unruly Iraqis being shot, is exactly the sort of thing the anti-war people warned about. Why has it evolved into sticking up for the Americans actions? It can be justified probably, as the soldiers who fired were most likely scared witless. Do you, Avon Lady, agree the war was a bad idea from the Iraqi peoples perspective as this sort of thing is obviously going to happen?

Sad, but that's the risk any occupying force takes...quite frankly, I'm surprisd there hasn't been more incidents like this... I think as time goes on attacks on US forces are going to increase. Many people in Iraq are already unhappy with the occupation, and the longer coalition forces are there, and as long as long as the country doesn't have free elections, tension and anger in Iraq is going to increase. I would not be surprised if in time we see rebellions and widespread violence on a daily basis. The coalition need to make major moves to make the majority of Iraqis happy or they are going to have a lot of trouble. I heard from a leftist Russian website (irakwar.ru-some of the responses to articles may be found offensive, you have been warned) that the real organised rebellion takes place on the 6th of July......

Woah Dude! thats heavy! Why the funny face? Not really that heavy. It was over a century before I was born, so...... I put a funny face in? It was meant to be I guess my finger slipped.

A lot of my family moved to Canada to live together in a huge mansion, but most of them were brutally slaughtered by their Butler so the survivors moved back to England.

I can't believe there's 5 pages on the meaning of racist....does it really matter whether it's called racism or not, because it's still discrimination against someone for something they cannot change when you don't even know them?

At least America actually had friends under Clinton.

I read somewhere that an organised rebellion is to have its D-Day take place on July 6th. I suspect it isn't true though.

No.....it was a response to your saying that the USA would be fine without helping in WWII.

Russia and Asia. Hitler made no plans secret of his plans to expand eastwards, it was just western europe didn't hold out as long as Russia, and Germany couldn't expand with France, Britain, etc attacking it constantly. The USA would not have been attacked for sometime, I expect.

Heh. Actually, with Germanys stance on the Iraq war the USA threatened to withdraw its troops their for protection. Germany said "Hell yes, get the hell out" and then they quickly withdrew their threat. They are not needed there.....it's only building up Americas image as a militant nation, which it needs to get rid of if it wants to defend itself from terrorism. Isolated, the USA will lose its power. Bull. If the USA didn't join in the second world war, who knows how long it would have been in the great depression? It was the WWII that helped pull it out, remember?

I'm no fan of the popular USA attitude to the constition-it is not a timeless list of rules, it's a list of rules that was made 200 years ago...... But that's irrelevant, so I be quiet now.

Woah, woah, woah. Let's forget the various newspeak we have, and have a look at the dictionary definition of a terrorist; someone who acheives their aims through terror. Now, Israel tries to scare Palestinians into not supporting terrorists, as it kills them if they do; regardless of the fact this has the opposite effect, this is using terror to acheive an aim. Therefore it is terrorism.

How is he paranoid? I could equally say someone else is paranoid if they believed Saddam Hussein had WMDs and connections to Al Queda.

Perhaps, now, it may be time for self reflection on your part?

But American satellites are not the only ones watching Iraq....if Europe catches them smuggling WMDs in, they're in big trouble. It isn't worth the risk for the Bush administration.

It appears to be working though....Israel looks like it may have to move out of the west bank and gaza strip, with the peace talks.

No, WMDs are hard to sneak into a country without foreign satellites or a regular guy at the CIA or NSA seeing them....more likely, they will fake documents to keep happy the people who stubbornly refuse to believe their government would lie.

I'm sorry, but it annoys me when people say that. It's, "I COULDN'T really care less." If you COULD care less, that means you DO care....because it's possible for you to have less caring, because you've just said that you could. Oh, never mind.

They had some non-linear paths on OFP, such as the mission where you attack montignac for the first time. If you fail, you get that mission where you start in the truck and then go to fight in the village, before losing and getting rescued by the Resistance....however, if you took montignac, you could go on and then your team dies and you wake up alone in the woods, deep in enemy territory......more missions like that would be good.

Is that including the conspiracy theorists in 1938 Germany? Or Winston Churchill, who was one of the few who thought that Hitler was planning to take over Europe and Russia? Those were conspiracy theorists, and were proved right.....