Jump to content
Bohemia Interactive Forums

acidcrash

Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    729

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Medals

  • Medals

Posts posted by acidcrash

  1. Posted

    yea i like that idea. It seems im the only one who ever guards the towns while everyone is off building tanks and helo's with me stuck still on infantry.

    does the amount of people in the town matter or do you need just the one for the extra cash? Us over at SWAF love it, been playing it constantly (several hour game in some cases biggrin.gif)

    however we've not detirmined what it is yet, but twice atleast while playing we have had nearly everyone (usually just one person and the admin survive) crash to desktop

    other than that, great! think we'll be keeping that map upto date on server wink.gif

  2. Posted

    hmm, gotta be metal (heavy, black, death, doom not nu), some rock and inustrial. some examples would be classics like Metallica and slayer to bands like Morbid angel Cradle of filth, ministry and ramstein. i myself cant stand rap etc, it makes me wanna kill myself its really not my cup of tea

    (i reckon a mods gonna close this pretty soon)

  3. Posted

    well for a start there is also deffinatly a M2 bradly version (or whatever its designation is with the ADATS system), and besides, it wouldnt be a matter of "placing a new chasis under the turret" it would require them to remake it from scratch, i know im more than happy with the adats as it is

  8. Posted

    theres several places for addons of one kind or another to go:

    weapons, units, islands etc go in the addons directory

    singe player missions go in the missions directory and,

    multiplayer missions go in the mpmissions directory.

    i hope this answers your question smile.gif

  9. Posted

    </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Ex-RoNiN @ Oct. 11 2002,11:09)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">wow.gif1--></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Uziyahu @ Oct. 11 2002,03wow.gif1)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Who is the chick in your signature graphic, Placebo?<span id='postcolor'>

    You are seeing ghosts mate, Placebo hasn't posted in this thread confused.gif<span id='postcolor'>

    lol i think he means you tounge.gif

  11. Posted

    yeh, it would ruin it to have the moped sounds, but i think we can all sit back and relax, Selectthis has made quite alot of good quality addons (take the Vietnam addons for example, all class addons)

    besides, if hes taken as long on sounds as it looks like he has on the model, then id say it has

    good job! smile.gif

  15. Posted

    </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (RaptorAce @ Oct. 07 2002,22:11)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">HAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAAHAH....

    Anyways, back to the aircraft... the EFT is a multirole aircraft, whereas the F-22 is made solely for dogfighting (even though it has the ability to carry bombs, as that position will probably be filled by the JSF)

    My thinking is... that the F-22 is stronger, and possibly the strongest air superiority fighter to date, I believe that because it was designed with manueverability in mind, unlike the EFT which is made to be a Jack-of-all-Trades aircraft and I think this gives the F-22 an automatic air to air advantage in it's original design.  

    Then again, I could be wrong since there's very little information about this aircraft.<span id='postcolor'>

    you obviously didnt read the announcement i posted, its been redesignated F/A-22 meaning its equal at attack not just figher

  19. Posted

    I think Falcon 4.0 can appear complicated: all those switches and buttons, especially in SuperPak3. but it just takes time to get used it and it becomes second nature almost.  

    i have no problem picking up flight sims though, but ive been playing them since the early days on amigas biggrin.gif

  20. Posted

    i agree, Falcon 4 with SP3 is very good, its just a shame that it has bugs (and very annoying bugs) such as CTD every time you "crash" or get shot down, then theres the sound bug, the sound is all stuttery from inside the cockpit and the other aircraft having the flight profile of the F16 too...take a B52 for example, flying around pulling Split-S's just shouldnt be possible...ahh well.

    but besides little niggly things like that its a vast improvement

  21. Posted

    </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Acidcrash @ Oct. 03 2002,16:53)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">for the record, the F22 has been redesignated F/A-22 since it has A-G capabilities, this from a congress announcement last week<span id='postcolor'>

    going back to what i said here, i dug out the announcement about the F22s redesignation:

    </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">> F-22 redesignation reflects combat role

    >

    > by Staff Sgt. A.J. Bosker

    > Air Force Print News

    >

    > WASHINGTON -- Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. John P. Jumper

    announced a

    > change in the designation of the F-22 Raptor at the 2002 Air Force

    > Association National Convention here Sept. 17. The change is meant

    to more

    > accurately reflect the aircraft's multimission roles and

    capabilities in

    > contemporary strategic environments.

    >

    > "Secretary (of the Air Force Dr. James G.) Roche and I have decided

    to adopt

    > the name F/A-22, using the A (or attack) prefix to emphasize the

    multiple

    > roles and many dimensions of the Raptor," Jumper explained. "The

    Raptor

    > will feed on prey both from the sky and from the (ground)."

    >

    > Advances in technology and emerging Air Force doctrine make today's

    Raptor

    > very different from the fighter envisioned when the program was

    first

    > planned. Technological advancements in the fire control radar and

    > integrated avionics, combined with the advent of smaller, very

    precise

    > munitions, create a far more powerful air-to-ground strike system,

    Jumper

    > said in a written statement.

    >

    > "Indeed, the Raptor's most significant contributions over the next

    30 years

    > will be (in) its attack role, particularly against the most lethal

    next two

    > generations of (enemy) surface-to-air missiles," Jumper said.

    >

    > The F/A-22 will enable the Air Force's other stealth assets to

    operate 24

    > hours a day and will "sanitize the fly corridors" for airlift

    aircraft to

    > resupply ground forces deployed in enemy territory, the general

    said.

    >

    > Roche said in a written statement that the Raptor has been

    transformed, in

    > line with Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld's priorities, to a

    > multimission, joint system that will change the way the United

    States and

    > its allies conduct war.

    >

    > "Therefore, a redesignation will increase the focus on this

    transformation

    > and allow people to better grasp this overall evolution," Roche

    said.

    >

    > The F/A-22 has evolved into an air dominance aircraft capable

    of "kicking

    > down the door" in anti-access situations, and the redesignation

    simply

    > better reflects the inherent air-to-ground and air-to-air

    capabilities of

    > the Raptor, Roche said.

    >

    > "Transformation is changing our thinking, but not necessarily

    throwing

    > everything old away," Jumper said. "It's building on what we have

    but using

    > it in very new ways."

    >

    > The F/A-22 is a prime example of the Air Force's approach to

    transforming by

    > combining air dominance, precision attack, networked intelligence,

    > surveillance and reconnaissance, and joint close air support into an

    > unprecedented single platform, he said.

    >

    > "Its sensors will provide valuable information regarding precise

    target

    > location and characteristics into a common network for all to use --

    both

    > air, land and sea," Jumper said. "In short, it will be its own

    > intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance platform."

    >

    > The F/A-22 will be the only system able to reliably engage cruise

    missiles

    > and will be delivered to replace fighters that have been in active

    service

    > longer than any fighter the Air Force has ever had in its

    inventory, Jumper

    > said. He added that the F/A-22 will be able to deploy with a

    fraction of

    > the logistics footprint and manpower required to sustain the

    service's

    > current 25-year old platforms.

    >

    > "(Secretary Roche and I) believe that the combination of these

    capabilities

    > is transformational and that this transformational weapon should be

    called

    > the F/A-22," Jumper said.

    <span id='postcolor'>

    might be veerring a little off the topic, but its related smile.gif

  24. Posted

    </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (denoir @ Oct. 03 2002,17:12)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Bah, the EF is shite anyway. JAS 39 Gripen all the way wink.gif<span id='postcolor'>

    pfft even the rafeale is better than the Gripen wink.gif

    *waits for Ran to appear*

  25. Posted

    </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Badgerboy @ Oct. 03 2002,01:46)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">1 on 1, with EQUALLY skilled pilots, a F22 would have no problem taking down a Typhoon BVR, or close up. Its sad to say, but it can outmaneouver a Typhoon from the data I've seen, and get into the furball with ease.

    However......!

    Thats what it is... a dedicated A-A aircraft. Oh ok, future models with be able to drop JDAMS, but thats a tacked on, half hearted capability. The Typhoon, can haul a massive amount of fire power to the target and nail it, and it that regard its more of a jack of all trades. Which makes sense when you realise how much the F-22 costs. The RAF couldn't possibly afford the F-22 (Although it was considered as a FOAS option), but we got a multirole A/C, unlike the F-22, which can do one role brilliantly, but is limited to that.

    1 F-22 = 3 1/2 Typhoons.

    A-A, I would like a F-22

    For multirole missions (Which the RAF specialises in), I would prefer a Typhoon.<span id='postcolor'>

    for the record, the F22 has been redesignated F/A-22 since it has A-G capabilities, this from a congress announcement last week

    and to end this, shall we just say each aircraft has its weakness's and strengths?  wink.gif

×