Airdude2

yep ur right but this is the only forum i got to for ofp, and its a change from bitchin on whether or not there needs to be so many planes

the game is on the UT2 engine and looks nice, but i would prefer they just gave us thier copy of the Vbs1 game minus the top secret weapons or whatever that MIGHT be in it. agree?

ahh i'm so stupid i made a post thats not a question and the statment contradicts itself. i mean if they made a demo how the hell would it work, making a demo would be giving away an update to the engine and the new island, maybe even some weapons. unless they made the demo self contained poeple could use it to update their flashpoint game and not bother buying it. i mean the single player sounds great, but i'd bet just like it is now there are allot of poeple who would only need/want the engine update new guns and new island for short single player missions and multiplayer gamin.

last time a checked (4 or 5 weeks ago) resistance was gonna be released this month (awesome i know where my b'day money is goin). it dosen't seem there will be time for a demo, i guess being an expansion they don't need one, but i was hopin to get some resistance action sooner rather than later

evis remember we had a discussiion about the tornado, Tiger, f-111 and su - 23 well i remember you saying you wouldn't make the tornado to us, and now i my joy cannot be contained that you are making one. can't wait to see this in action someone give this boy O2 and do it fast.

well if a mountan had a slope into the middle of another mountain i think it would be posible that the water could dig out a river with a right angle

i would really love to see a t-90 in the game even though its past the timeline. simply because its fast as and has a number of differences from the t-80. i've seen pics of the t-90 hitting mounts and jumping of them, it looks soo fast from those pics. i'll look for the site agian for screenshots, when you see it you wouldn't know whther to make it an air or ground unit those images and all credits from me go to http://www.army-technology.com

well i always thought laser designators could somehow be changed so they work like spotting targets for artillery or long range missiles

ahh cause you said "just because he's finnish" and it seemed like a good idea at the time sorta thing haha

i know what your saying mate. vepr, i recently had the honor of working with some fine finnish multimedia students. (they seem to like coming here to lean multimedia, something about a holiday + the govt pays em + a uni course ) anyway it was a good experince, one was very serious but enjoyed our social ethics here (he said poeple stick to themselves up there) and the other well, was very relaxed we smaked a llot of pot together too

UMM kegeteys dude, i find it very confusing when you post smileys hehe your pic to the side seems so serious and your smilies are well ......har dto believe hehe.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Sadico @ May 23 2002,14:58)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Yeah, the sukhoi s-37 (not su-37) and the x-29 have forward swept wings.<span id='postcolor'> umm yeah i knew that but how much of a manuver advantage does it give??? does anyone have a video of s-37 or x-29 in action???

umm to the post starter....ARE THOSe OTHER ONES MODELS, i have never seen a model that realistic in my life if so, i mean i thought walking with dino's and final fantasy looked good but thats redicules

i always thought low speed planes had better turning circles, like those stunt planes at airshows. also aren't the new su's and the x-29 supposed to be ultra manuverable because of thier forwards swept wings?

well they aint making no more ofp stuff after restistance from what i gather, so really its in thier best interest to release after resistance. (in case any smart asses make something that makes resistance redundant)