*QcEP*BlackHawk

Thanks for the update Suma, keep up the good work.

x2

Actualy this exploit is quite well known, I've tried it myself and its not a hack. I told Jiljoy how to reproduce it as well as another less known exploit which I won't talk about. Got enough BS going on with the first one already . I'm pretty sure kiljoy will come up with something for those in the following versions.

I had issues too, its all about tweaking it right in windows, in setpoint if you use it and in game. And BTW at longer range you should aim for the torso anyway... unless you have a sniper rifle and even then.

Theres a bunch of them that seem to enjoy themselves just ruining games. They affect more than only bots by doing so... but I know that a lot more cheaters do it for competitive PVP purposes.

I guess I will have to but I expect it would be a waste of time that's why I'm asking...

He hasn't said it in the particular post you quoted but he did say that same thing. *Edit buggy quote code

Don't want to hijack your thread but I was wondering if there is something to do with my old rig. It's an Athlon XP2600 OC to +3200 1gb DDR400 (if I'm not mistaken). I know it wouldnt be a big server but just wondering.

Like you said it's not as sophisticated and I would even add that it has little if nothing to do with our problem. From what I can remember AASA regroups a bunch of trusted servers and requires PBSS to add to their banlist. ArmA doesnt have anything like PBSS so what proof is there : none. What's left for us? Trusted server admins. There is no such thing as being banned on massive amounts of servers just because some guy posts your name somewhere. There is no "ArmA SA" so you don't get banned everywhere at the same time. Maybe you should consider trusting the admins a little. You know, not all of them are "ban 'em all brain dead morons". If it's not good enough for you why don't you start an "ArmA SA" yourself and make it the way it should be because this is going nowhere. Wait, I don't think you can... The banlist would have to rely on admin's word because there is no source of reliable evidence for ArmA yet. While I'm at it I think it would be easy to modify a PBSS and add the GUID and name you want. So it all comes down to the word of the admins on AA too.

Correct me if I'm wrong but vista comes with DX10.

OFP looks better than ArmA's lowest settings IMO.

3 words : Bad "admined" server. I wouldn't want to play there anyway. I must say I mostly play Evolution at this time so I'm pretty sure there are more cheating accusations from other players in PVP from frustrated players that simply suck . I know I was getting accused a lot when I was playing Americas Army. I guess I was too good for the amount of "honnor" I had... Never got banned from anywhere even when I got accused by some newer clan members of the servers where I used to play. Just play regularly on a good server you won't have any problems. Aren't most publicly available banlists made out of almost exclusively fake IDs? I admit I am not looking at all those banlists so I'm not well aware of that so I may be wrong. Of course it would be better if they provided some form of proof. What proof do you want? Screenshots? I can photoshop all the proof I want and I'm not even that good at photoshopping stuff. Server logs or something? I guess I could write that up too. You can fake anything making any proof worthless. I am with Tijay on this, I'd rather trust good server admins word. I understand your point but it doesn't seem possible, at this time at least. I'm also wondering... what's next? Trial before judge and jury? Even in real life cases innocents are sometimes convicted and in some countries a lot of them. Just thinking your views of this seem too idealistic. I guess I would agree with you if it was possible to provide bullet proof evidence, that is when not considering the extra work for server admins. Alright I will trust your word and take that back. Will you miss playing on that server? I know I wouldn't.

Chaos no one if forced to add any IDs to their ban list, including those in this thread I don't see what's the big problem. Personaly I dont mind banning fake ID's as they didnt buy the game and many if not the majority are doing BS on the servers. I think you're over reacting. I doubt server admins go to every "this guy hacks" thread and ban everyone just like that without any kind of proof. If some are well that's too bad I guess I won't miss playing on a bad admined server anyway. Last thing... No offense but I can easily imagine, reading your posts, that your attitude might have played in getting you banned once that cheater tried to make it look like you were the guy cheating.

Does similar things to me sometimes though not very often.

Haven't had any problems with them, installing or playing anything. ArmA runs a bit smoother (compared to 7.6), not by a lot but noticable and IQ seems to be the same as 7.6 (had lower IQ with 7.7). Using x1950xt 512mb

Accuracy yes, volume I'm not sure. Even though they do shoot massive amount of lead at you when they are fired upon it seems pretty realistic to me. To force the attacker into cover and make him cease fire then maneuver to hit him back it's pretty much the way too do it. Their accuracy and spotting abilities are just exagerated. I wonder if it would be possible for them to fire back in the general direction of the treath until they actualy do spot the attacker instead of instantly shooting back at him with deadly accuracy. As for the rest I fully agree with you.

AI still needs major tweaking but the fact that they fire back is perfectly ok to me. But after returning fire they should take cover and for god sakes they gotta stop the one shot pistol sniping you out of a chopper going 250km/h. <off topic mode on> This game reminds me much of ofp. It came out unplayable and got real good after a bunch of patches. I hope it will turn out that way as well. Maybe it would have been better if they had properly beta tested the game. Sometimes I even wonder if BIS devs even try their games at least few times before they release them. There are just so many evident small but annoying things that just kill the gameplay. </end off topic mode> About suppressing it doesnt work that bad for me as long as I am at least 500m from them, they get down and dont shoot back much. Still hit them pretty good with the m240 but its getting harder at that range.

Get the 8800 and overclock the CPU you can get major overclocks out of these babies . Even with stock cooling as long as you got decent case ventilation your ok to get a nice overlock. I got 1ghz more out of my e6420 with almost no voltage increase and its still running pretty cool.

Maybe a mod should "unsticky" or update that hotfix thread. Anyway, its outdated and its misleading to get a bad set of drivers.

Might be your cpu if you play a mission with lots of AI. It kills my frame rate too but its still playable, sometimes barely playable but still is. I doubt its driver related but who knows ...

As far as I'm concerned IQ has taken a hit with 7.7. Textures at a distance aren't as crisp, I could almost say blurry. In arma performance is the same as 7.6 but I do get a 100pts increase on my 3dmark05 score but on a 13k+ score it is nothing especialy since I lost some IQ. Going back to 7.6 btw I got a x1950xt 512mb

I keep getting disconnected nearly each game I play in resistance, I mean like 80% + games I play I loose connection. I don't have and never had any problems with 1.46 (no problem with any other game either). I tried in 1.90 and 1.91 both do the same thing. I didn't try 1.85 but I'm sure it wont change anything. I just reinstalled windows, ofp, res, etc because I changed mobo so I tought it could help but same thing as it was  . What happens is about 95% of the time if I ever see the yellow square connection indicator it turns red and then no message received for ** seconds. Only exception to that is when it shows up while loading. Sytem specs: - MSI kt3 ultra2 -AMD XP 1800 @ 1700mhz -512mb ddr333 mhz -gf4 ti4200 @ 308/565 -SB audigy (all very well cooled of course...) -Win XP pro -SMC router (with my computer set to DMZ host.) Someone plz help me, I'd just like to be able to finish more than a game out of 20 for once .

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (haunted @ Mar. 28 2003,12:22)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">I know how to do everything a reg would, apart from stripping and cleaning a GPMG <span id='postcolor'> I've seen some smart ass cadets before, doesn't impress me a bit . Of course I don't know wich country you're from but I still doubt that in any country cadets will learn as much stuff as the regs, not even reserves. I don't think you guys would like to learn some military laws, Geneva conventions and some other boring stuff we have to know. I think I could also add many combat drills that you don't get to learn, weapons you don't get to shoot because ammo for some weapons is very expensive, etc. I do see that you're interested in this so when you're old enough you know what to do . Only then you could tell if you knew as much as you think you do... but I'm getting off topic so back to stories.

6 pages down, time to bump again . I see quite a lot of people who didnt post here yet that have connection lost often so I think it's a good idea to bump it again.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (STGN @ Mar. 27 2003,10:42)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">[...] I had just had my night whach and had goan to sleep when a gruppe of sargents came and threw a traning granade about 5 meters from me an started fullauto fire whit theres G3 rifles and I tell you it is not funny to wake up like that. STGN<span id='postcolor'> It's much more fun with an arty simulator , of course from so close it would be dangerous...