y0ungb0b

RvS demo looks, plays and sounds great. The only thing missing is a half-decent ballistics model. You still cant seem to shoot through any 'soft' materials. That was the great thing about Swat 3 - taking cover behind a corner of a wall only to find a suspects gunfire ripping right through. It made you feel very vunerable unlike many games nowadays that let you hide behind a cardboard box with complete safety. I would rather spend CPU time on those calculations than throwing around more shiny pixels. Anyway, thumbs up to UBI and welcome back for producing a half decent looking close quarters combat game instead of trying to poorly imitate OFP with GR.

Im sure all the weapon inaccuracies will be addressed in future patches. Although I dont see how BIS overlooked the ammo loadouts. Only fight battles you know you will win? Wheres the fun in that? Â

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (quakergamer @ July 15 2002,01:45)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">2--></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (y0ungb0b @ July 14 2002,212)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (quakergamer @ July 14 2002,19:28)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">OMFG!!! The guy is on crack!!!<span id='postcolor'> Thats nothing. Read UK PC Gamer review. Good score, but didnt write anything remotely constructive. Obviously didnt play the game at all (check the box-out describing the boring start to the game - you have to wait for the bus. duh! or OFP that much to begin with to notice the improvements.<span id='postcolor'> lol , you can wait for the bus in 1st mission . i didnt even knew that . I've taken my good old bike and thats it!<span id='postcolor'> Yeah I knew too but you have options. You can crawl to work if you like. Its just the review made a big thing of the sheer boredom of waiting around for the bus. I also hate it when people like the bloke who wrote the review go on about how the 3d engine looks out of date and should be more like Ghost Recon. Ok, so a lot of other engines look better, but not drawing the amount of expansive scenery that the OFP engine does. If I had to be negative, the thing I would say about Resistance would be to do with the large towns and cities. Everything is laid out too 'box-like'. They are also too un-inhabited. But thats only being picky ;-)

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (quakergamer @ July 14 2002,19:28)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">OMFG!!! The guy is on crack!!!<span id='postcolor'> Thats nothing. Read UK PC Gamer review. Good score, but didnt write anything remotely constructive. Obviously didnt play the game at all (check the box-out describing the boring start to the game - you have to wait for the bus. duh! or OFP that much to begin with to notice the improvements.

Its an old trick. Remember 8-bit games? If it was an arcade conversion, the publishers always stuck screenshots from the arcade or 16-bit versions on the back ...

Easy - Photoshop

lol - next it will be an Evel Knievel skin and attempting to clear the river ...

Havent gone that mad on it yet. Too busy with the campaign. I do know you cant pull wheelies on it  The only thing i was annoyed with is that the bike sometimes falls over into scenery. When you get back on youre upside down and cant move. The thing needs a stand!