weedmasta
Member-
Content Count
24 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Medals
Community Reputation
0 NeutralAbout weedmasta
-
Rank
Private First Class
-
Reverting to Vanilla Arma III (i.e. official full release version 1.00)?
weedmasta replied to weedmasta's topic in ARMA 3 - TROUBLESHOOTING
Thank you sir. That fixed it for me. It appears CBA is not compatible. -
Reverting to Vanilla Arma III (i.e. official full release version 1.00)?
weedmasta replied to weedmasta's topic in ARMA 3 - TROUBLESHOOTING
Hmm, so the only way for me to get back to 1.00 is to reinstall the whole damned thing :( ---------- Post added at 08:25 ---------- Previous post was at 08:17 ---------- Checking the list of servers most servers seem to be running 1.00 and I can't enter any of them. -
Reverting to Vanilla Arma III (i.e. official full release version 1.00)?
weedmasta replied to weedmasta's topic in ARMA 3 - TROUBLESHOOTING
That wasn't my intention, I noticed this >> "This forum is asking questions unrelated to troubleshooting. IN PARTICULAR FOR NEWER MEMBERS." a little too late. Thank you for your helpful reply... ---------- Post added at 20:43 ---------- Previous post was at 20:40 ---------- In the meant time I went back to dev version, downloaded some stuff and again back to opt out and downloaded some stuff once again, still version 1.00.109911 -
Reverting to Vanilla Arma III (i.e. official full release version 1.00)?
weedmasta replied to weedmasta's topic in ARMA 3 - TROUBLESHOOTING
Yes as I said. ---------- Post added at 19:43 ---------- Previous post was at 19:41 ---------- It downloads something, but won't revert to 1.00 -
Reverting to Vanilla Arma III (i.e. official full release version 1.00)?
weedmasta posted a topic in ARMA 3 - TROUBLESHOOTING
I used dev. build through out the alpha and beta and didn't change it to "Opt Out" at release. Now our server runs the vanilla version and even though I chose Opt Out and it updated, I still get a red circle and when I try to join the server I get kicked out because certain pbo's have the wrong keys. So in short, I have version 1.00.109911 and I want to revert back to 1.00. How do I do this? Already tried opt out on the Beta tab in steam and Verify integrity of game cache. Of course asking this because I don't want to download the whole game again. -
Reverting to Vanilla Arma III (i.e. official full release version 1.00)?
weedmasta posted a topic in ARMA 3 - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS
I used dev. build through out the alpha and beta and didn't change it to "Opt Out" at release. Now our server runs the vanilla version and even though I chose Opt Out and it updated, I still get a red circle and when I try to join the server I get kicked out because certain pbo's have the wrong keys. So in short, I have version 1.00.109911 and I want to revert back to 1.00. How do I do this? Already tried opt out on the Beta tab in steam and Verify integrity of game cache. ---------- Post added at 19:09 ---------- Previous post was at 18:40 ---------- Of course asking this because I don't want to download the whole game again. -
I read on a clan page that it is save to install OFP multiple times on your harddisk. Thx for the suggestion anyway avonlady
-
not reinstalling i meant installing a second time in another directory. I realised when i installed Res over Original OFP without any updates, it didnt create an addons folder in the ofp directory. All the files went into Res/Addons and since then i havent had a problem with addons ever since. But i think that is the reason i can't play 1.46 cause all vehicle and weapon files are in the Res/Addons folder. Basically i want to install Original OFP into another directory (so it will be installed twice on my harddisk), will that kick fade in?
-
I have latest version of OFP:Res atm, both CDs original copies but i want to play 1.46 with my m8 who hasnt got Res yet. I tried by putting original OFP CD in and joining a 1.46 server but it didnt work. I am thinking to install original OFP in another folder, my question is will this activate fade if i install the game a second time on my harddisk?
-
</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">I see you edited your post, well you've learned one thing at least in this thread. My post still applies however.<span id='postcolor'> I forgot to add it so what? Please close this thread i have made my point at least in between these useless arguments.
-
I bought the game the first time it came out. Yes i haven't been in your so called forum community all that long no but that doesn't mean i don't have common knowledge. It's still BIS making the game in the end no matter how much control CM has over them. BIS are the coders after all and not CM. And about Red Hammer having nothing to do with BIS, i didn't know about that
-
Dude BIS or CM they are working together in the end.
-
</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">and you are getting way out of point. because BIS took risk with OFP, they need to be rewarded. and they also took chance of implemeting new netcode. so they need to be rewarded. you may think a netcode is an essential, but in reality, it's not.<span id='postcolor'> You still don't get my point dude. Of course you have to be rewarded if you do work and take risks. DOH! And BIS would still need to be rewarded even if OFP wasn't successful cause they took so much risk but they wouldn't cause they wouldn't earn enough money or no money at all. GET IT? Still in the dark? As for multiplayer, you might be one of those people playing SP only and fiddling around mission editor but it doesn't mean everyone else does the same. There are thousands of servers up there and these days one of the main ways to keep an audience focused long on a game is the Multiplayer aspect. There is nothing like playing against real people as i said before. You might be a 56ker who doesn't like MP, that's is not my problem but it's OBVIOUS THAT MP NETCODE IS ESSENTIAL, it's a big important step in a game's life cycle. Pls lets not get into that actor crap again it's getting too off topic and you are starting to contradict yourself and making no sense (going from risk to chance and dragging it on). But i would like to indicate this: </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">MANY of those actors who are earning millions, do not have a proper education and were working in ordinary low paid jobs before they became 'stars'. <span id='postcolor'> I said many actors, not most, not all but M-A-N-Y </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">however, they decided to improve it, and put a price tag, and many ppl consider it adequate. <span id='postcolor'> Many people may consider it adequate, yes but many others do not (one of them obviously being me). </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">About crappy netcode, just tell me how YOU would have done it, keeping in mind every specificity of OFP.<span id='postcolor'> I never said i would have done it better. And i didnt say that it never improved either. Apperantly the new netcode is good. Why not do it in the first place if they can. You know why cause we are the testing area. They sell some crap/unfinished game full of bugs and hope it hits big. When it does they start improving it. That's like (as an example i gave before) your car dealer telling you that your new car has some parts missing but they will send it to you later and charge you extra for it. Or even the manufacturer making a car but not testing it and selling it to you...Sorry if you crash we'll know whats wrong...bullshit...Meaning it's not complete. No not perfect (nothing can be) but not complete either. One way or another m8 there is always someone who takes in the big bucks in this case being CM. And once again: </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Keep the darned graphical enhancement, the new island, the new maps and heck even keep the new weapons for all i care but please give us old OFP players the new netcode. Please do us the favor i think we deserve it after waiting for so long and having to play with that crappy netcode <span id='postcolor'>
-
Norsu, what use does it have in MP if it is messed up? Do you think it's gonna be working properly on MP when it doesn't on the editor or something? lmao
-
</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">I heard somewhere that G4 is just an updated version of the G3 (or atleast the cheaper versions are).<span id='postcolor'> Please stick to the topic