twoodster
Member-
Content Count
40 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Medals
Everything posted by twoodster
-
Yeah - I hate all the bunnyhopping in games like BF2, but not being able to get over a fence two foot high is almost as annoying!
-
Peformance on demo compared to full game
twoodster replied to RussianElite's topic in ARMA - GENERAL
Sounds like a plan! I'll buy a 10" monitor.....and a magnifying glass -
Peformance on demo compared to full game
twoodster replied to RussianElite's topic in ARMA - GENERAL
Do you know how terrible a game looks on a 20" WS monitor when run at 1024x768? Trust me - it doesn't look good! I don't think I should have to turn the settings down that much after spending 700quid on upgrading my computer! -
Peformance on demo compared to full game
twoodster replied to RussianElite's topic in ARMA - GENERAL
Not bad??? LOL just look what kind of system he got: 6600 Core 2 Duo, 8800GTS and 2gig DDR ram and only 20-25 fps. Aye, it's more annoying because I bought all that just for the game To be honest my framerate probably isnt as high as 25 in the towns etc - it gets notably choppy at times. -
Peformance on demo compared to full game
twoodster replied to RussianElite's topic in ARMA - GENERAL
Na, framerate is just as bad. Get around 20-25fps on 1680x1050 with a 6600 Core 2 Duo, 8800GTS and 2gig DDR ram -
I think my performance has gone down with the new patch too. Intel Core 2 Duo 6600 2gig DDR 8800GTS 640meg Really not playable at all on 1680x1050
-
Dual Core User try the following
twoodster replied to WhiskeyBullets's topic in ARMA - TROUBLESHOOTING
Nope, made it slower for me Core 2 Duo 6600 -
Well I'm using an 8800GTS and still getting shitty performance
-
I bought a Geforce 8800GTS and it still runs like cack Probably because I've only got a Athlon 64 3500+ though - looks like I'll be updating that next!
-
On 1280x1024 - Very High...........I get..............1992! Impressive stuff! Interesting that you have the same problem Herbert. Perhaps we've chosen the one stupidly expensive graphics card that doesn't actually work with the game Although saying that, someone else said they had a GTX and were getting 8000 odd.
-
I managed to get it up to 3100ish by adding the memory line to the startup command. Still seems very low in comparison to similar systems though. The problem definately seems to be with the textures not loading quick enough or something - the hard disc clunks like hell on the runway sequence and the spinning camera tests. I've got the downloaded version - is there a problem with that at all?
-
Yup, the second pass runs just as badly as the first
-
I know - it's a little worrying! But yeah, I definately set it to Normal which automatically reset the resolution to 1024x768 etc The textures seemed very slow loading up in that test though. For example that sweep across the runway - the textures hadn't fully loaded until the camera stopped moving.
-
2272 - and that's after I spent 330quid on an 8800GTS!! Athlon 64 3500 2gig Crucial DDR400 ram
-
To the people who are playing ArmA, how is it?
twoodster replied to evilnate's topic in ARMA - GENERAL
You shouldn't have to play on 1024x768 with the systems some of you have! It's clearly been poorly optimised - as they aren't cutting edge graphics wise by any stretch of the imagination. We can only hope they'll sort out the performance with the coming patches!