nordin dk

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (placebo @ June 08 2002,00:07)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">LOL biased much? England only played defensively in the last 15-20 minutes, saying that Argentina played liked world champions is sheer nonsense. First half and up until midway through the second half England were constantly on the counter attack and could easily have been 2 or 3 goals in the lead, I guess you missed the 17 pass move leading up to Sheringham's stunning right footed volley? Or the superbly struck Scholes volley from 35 yards which again took a good save from their keeper? Or perhaps the move which ended up with Beckham running the length of the pitch and just dragging his shot wide? Or the Sinclair run and shot? I could go on. As for football not being fair, no it's not, if it were then Argentina would have been down to ten men, Batistuta made at least 4 challenges worthy of a yellow card. If Argentina were so great how come they barely managed a shot on target? Other than the Batistuta header in the first half and the header from a corner in the second half Seaman was barely troubled, while the Argentina keeper had to make at least half a dozen quality saves, not including the superb Owen dribble and shot that came back off the inside of the post, Argentina had a fair few shots but most of them went a long long way over the goal. As for Beckham nearly crying, perhaps if you knew anything about football and the significance of that goal, the events of the last 4 years, the events of the last 8 weeks, then perhaps you'd understand, but clearly all that escaped you <span id='postcolor'> hehe, hit a sore spot? You should just be happy you won. Maybe, if we're really lucky, youll get to meet Denmark in the next round, and you can beat us also. I understand the significance of football, the mythology of England vs. Argentina and all the other crap. Why do you imagine Beckham cried? Because football is no longer a sport but a buisness? nah... He's a great player b.t.w. no doubt about it...

one of them had a huge booger hanging by a small thread in his right nostril. Just as he was about the pick it and roll it into a little ball, a hummingbird flew in front of him, hovered an inch in front of his nose and ate it. Then

Hey FetishFool, what's the plan? Chances are if people are obese, they have issues with it, so they probably wont come out and show their swimsuit pictures on a public forum.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Warin @ June 07 2002,23:31)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Though I am laughing on the outside, on the inside I am screaming in horror. Oh god...someone with photoshop is just beyond sick and twisted. And Nordin...I seem to remember in another thread you ragging me out for like Ritchie and Tarentino.. Those pictures..and the story of how you found them, give me all sorts of reasons to believe your sense of style is a little on the whacked out side <span id='postcolor'> Hey hey, I'm not really raggin you, I just oppose to calling them geniuses. I think that word shouldn't be used to lightly, unless you like to see it being applied in the end to people like Madonna, Geoge Clooney, Jerry Springer or George Bush (to name totally random examples of sucessful people). A friend of mine sent me those bushgirls, and thought they are a testimony to somebody having to much time on their hands, I found them quite amusing.

The more I think of it, the more pissed I get actually. Hypocrites! Go watch some commercials, talkshows, porn and supermodels ...pet your caged animals, worship your pityful idols. Buy more things, spend more money, skate on the surface of things...bleh! Don't talk about what's good for you or not, unless you're prepared to turn the whole fucking society upside down. I'm feeling very advocatexxx-like right now

Damn that was some match. I never saw a team play so defensive. Pathetic, England! I thought you liked the game Argentina looked much more like a World Champion, and England should take the first plane home. Just goes to show, that football is not fair. And poor little Beckham, whose life is so tough, he almost cried when he scored that penalty

Wow double topic! Impressive. Mods' delete one of them please

And this guy is one of the masteminds behind it: Here are his his fields of interest: Going beyond the standard model. Fitting its parameters such as quark and lepton masses, mixing angles and fine-structure constants. Random dynamics. (Could the fundamental physical "laws" be enormously complicated, but our well-known laws come out in a limit?) Lattice quantum gravity. String field theory. Casimir effect. Neutrino oscillations. Baryogenesis. Chaos in Yang-Mills lattice. Why do we have three plus one dimensions? Arrows of time and Hawking's no-boundary proposal.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Tex [uSMC] @ June 07 2002,20:04)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (nordin dk @ June 07 2002,18<!--emo&)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (advocatexxx @ June 07 2002,04:20)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Tex [uSMC] @ June 06 2002,18<!--emo&)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"> You liked The Abyss?? I wouldnt be insulting anyones taste in movies if I were you<span id='postcolor'> Well no offense there "TEX", but most people on this planet would watch The Abyss over Wag The Dog anyday.<span id='postcolor'> Where's the official poll?<span id='postcolor'> LOL, I think I hit a nerve there. Dont know what you have against Wag the Dog, its a good movie. Good actors, a decent plot, not to mention a completely ruthless sense of humor. And The Abyss? Really all I can remember (thank God) is that it had the worst ending of any movie ever (except maybe 2001 a Space Odyssey. I never really "got it", even though I thought the movie was pretty thought provoking).<span id='postcolor'> Just to make sure it's clear, I have nothing against The Abyss. I wouldn't rate it among the top 200 probably, but it was entertaining back then, certainly. I have a beef with advocatexxx's crude generalisation and speaking on the behalf of the rest of the world

Lol I'm not entitled to an opinion I didn't expect this to become an anti rotten.com thread, but why not... I hope this is not just cases of classical denial. Eveybody has a curiosity towards death, but of course there's a natural reaction when you see it. In nature, if you see your own kind dead, it means there's a pretty good chance you could die as well, so your body is telling you to get the hell out. Modern man, on the other hand, is essentially reliant on it's ability to supress natural urges. That's what makes us different than animals. Don't watch if you don't want to. ...but you know you want to, and that's what pisses you off. My father's a doctor, and when I was a kid we'd look through his medical books to try and find the grossest diseases and pictures. My friend found a dead cat in a local park, and he gathered every kid in the block and we all stood and watched it until somebody's parents came and removed it. I once saw a car accident where a guy walked out in front of a Porsche, and he basically got his head smashed. The image though that stuck with me, was of another guy falling over on his bike because he wasn't watching where he was going, he was watching the dead guy's brains... Rotten.com is excactly that. Morbid fascination. It's human, so please get off your high horses. Anyway, FYI rotten.com is a lot more than death and mutilation. The "daily rotten" is daily selections of newspaper clips and historical facts that all somehow bear evidence to the oddities of life.

I don't know really, just wanted to mark it...

Give them the cucumber:

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Albert Schweizer @ June 07 2002,18:44)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"><span id='postcolor'> <span style='font-size:17pt;line-height:100%'>UGLY MAN CLONES FISH</span>

Damn, I thought this was a spam thread...

@advocatexxx </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">To believe in something, to trust in something, to have faith based on no proof seems illogical, it seems foolish, yet 95% of our species still do so.<span id='postcolor'> Perhaps for a truly contemporary debate on religion, the point of interest should be not the subject of proof but of choice. Proof is a horse that's been ridden to the point of exhaustion, and what it comes down to is that "Proof" is as fleeting a concept as "God", meaning that God cannot be proven or 'un'proven, until an exact science of measuring divinity is perfected. Making that choice, then. What in us decides? Are we naturally predisposed, is that choice an evolutionary benefit? Socially, I'd be inclined to suggest yes. In a relatively small herd (or whatever the correct word is for a congregation of Neanderthals is ), having a focal point might benefit the herd, might make it work better together. So those herds that had a religious inclination would outlive those that did not.

Some of the options are for fun Â

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Espectro @ June 07 2002,14:13)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Smart kids are never bored.<span id='postcolor'> Not always true. The more developed the mind is, the quicker it picks up information and develop abstractions from the current item of interest. From any object or situation you can derive information, and the quicker you exhaust that information (unless you believe that any such object holds infinite amounts of information) the quicker you get bored with it.

Won't somebody make up a topic to discuss in this thread? How about rascist bigotry? Or just a more general hatred and envy... All those so inclined get in here and vent their frustration, and I "promise" you won't hear a word for it

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (advocatexxx @ June 07 2002,04:20)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Tex [uSMC] @ June 06 2002,18<!--emo&)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"> You liked The Abyss?? I wouldnt be insulting anyones taste in movies if I were you<span id='postcolor'> Well no offense there "TEX", but most people on this planet would watch The Abyss over Wag The Dog anyday.<span id='postcolor'> Where's the official poll?

@Hilandor Wicked! Now where can I buy sodium lights @RedStorm Sorry dude, reduced postcounts are a killer

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Scorpio @ June 07 2002,15:45)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Its probably Nordindk who is the fattest. (He posts all those fat women)<span id='postcolor'> Nope I'm 180 cm tall and weigh in at around 80 kg. Pretty average I'd wager. Actually I haven't weighed myself in a very long time, and I think it might be a little less... Edited to include stupid american measurements Weight: 176 pounds Height: 5'9 Metric Calculator

This is a lot more interesting than the negative rants advocatexxx.

Boners.com is a subsite of rotten.com Lots of fun stuff